preferable rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

preferable rule in Washington

11 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Ghanam v. Doesgreen
michctapp · 2014 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015Cooley Law Sch. v. John Doe 1, 300 Mich. App. 245, 266 , 833 N.W.2d 331 (2013) (court rules require plaintiff to survive motion for summary disposition and allow Doe to obtain protective order); see also Ghanam v. John Does, 300 Mich. App. 522, 539-40 , 845 N.W.2d 128 (2014) (endorsing Dendrite/Cahill as a preferable standard but following Cooley as precedent). 9 In Washington, the two standards are not identical.

11
Kist v. Buttsgreen
nd · 1942 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1960–1960
2 sentences

1960See Kist v. Butts (1942), 71 N.D. 436 , 1 N.W. (2d) 612 , 138 A.L.R. 1206 . [7] We entertain no doubt as to Bellingham's desire and intent to legislate in this field.

1960See Kist v. Butts (1942), 71 N.D. 436 , 1 N.W. (2d) 612 , 138 A.L.R. 1206 . [7] We entertain no doubt as to Bellingham's desire and intent to legislate in this field.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (1)

CaseNegativeCited
State v. Furthred
wash · 1914 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011State v. Furth, 82 Wash. 665 , 144 P. 907 (1914), overruled by State v. Devin, 158 Wn.2d 157 , 142 P.3d 599 (2006).

2011State v. Furth, 82 Wash. 665 , 144 P. 907 (1914), overruled by State v. Devin, 158 Wn.2d 157 , 142 P.3d 599 (2006).

11

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
People v. City of Centralia green
illappct · 1954
2 sentences

1983People v. Centralia, 1 Ill.

1983People v. Centralia, 1 Ill.

31973–1983
Harris v. Burnett green
washctapp · 1975
2 sentences

2018Reversible error is not present unless the preferable instruction has been submitted and has been refused." Harris, 12 Wn.

1977Harris v. Burnett, 12 Wn.

21977–2018
State v. Aten green
wash · 1996
2 sentences

2001In Aten the Supreme Court stated that "the preferable rule under the facts of this case" was that "corpus delicti is not established when independent evidence supports reasonable and logical inferences of both criminal agency and noncriminal cause." Aten, 130 Wash.2d at 660 , 927 P.2d 210 .

2001In Aten the Supreme Court stated that “the preferable rule under the facts of this case” was that “corpus delicti is not established when independent evidence supports reasonable and logical inferences of both criminal agency and noncriminal cause.” Aten, 130 Wn.2d at 660 .

22001–2001
Thomas M Cooley Law School v. Doe 1 green
michctapp · 2013
2 sentences

2015Cooley Law Sch. v. John Doe 1, 300 Mich. App. 245, 266 , 833 N.W.2d 331 (2013) (court rules require plaintiff to survive motion for summary disposition and allow Doe to obtain protective order); see also Ghanam v. John Does, 300 Mich. App. 522, 539-40 , 845 N.W.2d 128 (2014) (endorsing Dendrite/Cahill as a preferable standard but following Cooley as precedent). 9 In Washington, the two standards are not identical.

2015Cooley Law Sch. v. John Doe 1, 300 Mich. App. 245, 266 , 833 N.W.2d 331 (2013) (court rules require plaintiff to survive motion for summary disposition and allow Doe to obtain protective order); see also Ghanam v. John Does, 300 Mich. App. 522, 539-40 , 845 N.W.2d 128 (2014) (endorsing Dendrite/Cahill as a preferable standard but following Cooley as precedent). 9 In Washington, the two standards are not identical.

12015–2015
State v. Baxter green
washctapp · 2006
1 sentence

2015A prima facie showing means “ ‘evidence of sufficient circumstances which would support a logical and reasonable inference of the facts sought to be proved.’ ” State v. Baxter, 134 Wn.

12015–2015
State v. Devin green
wash · 2006
1 sentence

2011State v. Furth, 82 Wash. 665 , 144 P. 907 (1914), overruled by State v. Devin, 158 Wn.2d 157 , 142 P.3d 599 (2006).

12011–2011
State v. Devin green
wash · 2006
1 sentence

2011State v. Furth, 82 Wash. 665 , 144 P. 907 (1914), overruled by State v. Devin, 158 Wn.2d 157 , 142 P.3d 599 (2006).

12011–2011
State v. Aten green
wash · 1996
1 sentence

2001In Aten the Supreme Court stated that "the preferable rule under the facts of this case" was that "corpus delicti is not established when independent evidence supports reasonable and logical inferences of both criminal agency and noncriminal cause." Aten, 130 Wash.2d at 660 , 927 P.2d 210 .

12001–2001
Heitfeld v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Keglers green
wash · 1950
2 sentences

1975Heitfeld v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Keglers, 36 Wn.2d 685 , 220 P.2d 655 , 18 A.L.R.2d 983 (1950); White v. Burke, 31 Wn.2d 573 , 197 P.2d 1008 (1948).

1975Heitfeld v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Keglers, 36 Wn.2d 685 , 220 P.2d 655 , 18 A.L.R.2d 983 (1950); White v. Burke, 31 Wn.2d 573 , 197 P.2d 1008 (1948).

11975–1975
White v. Burke green
wash · 1948
2 sentences

1975Heitfeld v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Keglers, 36 Wn.2d 685 , 220 P.2d 655 , 18 A.L.R.2d 983 (1950); White v. Burke, 31 Wn.2d 573 , 197 P.2d 1008 (1948).

1975Heitfeld v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Keglers, 36 Wn.2d 685 , 220 P.2d 655 , 18 A.L.R.2d 983 (1950); White v. Burke, 31 Wn.2d 573 , 197 P.2d 1008 (1948).

11975–1975

Where else courts name it

WA 11 (1960–2018) PA 6 (1966–1987) NJ 6 (1952–2002) CA 6 (1968–2014) MD 6 (1963–1997) IL 4 (1920–1990) CT 4 (2008–2017) FL 4 (1967–1988) NY 4 (1862–1999) LA 3 (1961–1998) OK 3 (1955–1985) ID 3 (1962–1999) KY 2 (1914–1971) NM 2 (1985–2003) IA 2 (1910–1995) WV 2 (1961–1961)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check