10 California opinions name it 3 courts 1968–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Griffin v. Illinoisgreen2 sentences2020Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system—all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, ‘stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.’” (Griffin, supra, 351 U.S. at p. 17 , italics added.) Subsequent cases applied Griffin to other fees and costs of using the criminal courts. 2020They are not supposed to be retributive (to punish the family), rehabilitative (to help the youth) or restorative (to repay victims).’ [Citation.] [This study] also points out that ‘[b]ecause Black and Latino youth are overrepresented and overpunished ... in the juvenile system, families of color bear a disproportionate burden of the fees’ and the inordinate debt these families incur ‘correlates with a greater likelihood of recidivism, even after controlling for case characteristics and youth demographics.’” ( Neal, supra, 29 Cal.App.5th at pp. 827-828, fn. omitted, italics added.) To bear the | 4 | 10 |
Douglas v. Californiagreen2 sentences1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, `stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.' Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ]." ( Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898]; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ]; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ]; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (188 1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, `stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.' Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ]." ( Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898]; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ]; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ]; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (188 | 1 | 3 |
Chambers v. Floridagreen2 sentences2017(See Griffin , 351 U.S. at p. 17 , 76 S.Ct. 585 [Equal protection safeguards "the central aim of our entire judicial system-all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, 'stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court,' " quoting Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227 , 241, 60 S.Ct. 472 , 84 L.Ed. 716 ].) As noted above, Hosner 's holding is grounded in this important equal protection principle. 2017(See Griffin , 351 U.S. at p. 17 , 76 S.Ct. 585 [Equal protection safeguards "the central aim of our entire judicial system-all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, 'stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court,' " quoting Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227 , 241, 60 S.Ct. 472 , 84 L.Ed. 716 ].) As noted above, Hosner 's holding is grounded in this important equal protection principle. | 1 | 2 |
Britt v. North Carolinagreen1 sentence2015(Britt v. North Carolina (1971) 404 U.S. 226, 227 (Britt).) It is this bedrock right to equal protection of the law that underlies our Supreme Court’s decision in Hosner. | 1 | 1 |
Draper v. Washingtongreen2 sentences1981(March v. Municipal Court, supra, 7 Cal.3d 422, 428 ; and see Draper v. Washington (1963) 372 U.S. 487, 499 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 899, 907 , 83 S.Ct. 774 ].) Although there was some earlier authority to the contrary, it became settled that no distinction will be drawn between the rights of indigent, and nonindigent, persons convicted of felonies who have appealed their convictions, to have an appropriate record on appeal furnished at the expense of the state. 1981(March v. Municipal Court, supra, 7 Cal.3d 422, 428 ; and see Draper v. Washington (1963) 372 U.S. 487, 499 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 899, 907 , 83 S.Ct. 774 ].) Although there was some earlier authority to the contrary, it became settled that no distinction will be drawn between the rights of indigent, and nonindigent, persons convicted of felonies who have appealed their convictions, to have an appropriate record on appeal furnished at the expense of the state. | 1 | 1 |
Barbier v. Connollygreen2 sentences1968It requires as a minimum that legislative classifications be rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, 8-9 [18 *653 L.Ed.2d 1010, 1015-1016, 87 S.Ct. 1817 ]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 579-580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ]; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; Perez v. Sharp, supra, 32 Cal.2d 711, 714 .) "The Constitution does not require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as though they were the same" ( Tigner v. Texas (1 1968It requires as a minimum that legislative classifications be rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, 8-9 [18 *653 L.Ed.2d 1010, 1015-1016, 87 S.Ct. 1817 ]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 579-580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ]; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; Perez v. Sharp, supra, 32 Cal.2d 711, 714 .) "The Constitution does not require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as though they were the same" ( Tigner v. Texas (1 | 1 | 1 |
Yick Wo v. Hopkinsgreen2 sentences1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, `stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.' Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ]." ( Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898]; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ]; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ]; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (188 1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, `stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.' Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ]." ( Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898]; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ]; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ]; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (188 | 1 | 1 |
Truax v. Corrigangreen2 sentences1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, `stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.' Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ]." ( Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898]; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ]; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ]; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (188 1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, `stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.' Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ]." ( Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898]; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ]; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ]; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (188 | 1 | 1 |
Tigner v. Texasgreen2 sentences1968It requires as a minimum that legislative classifications be rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, 8-9 [18 *653 L.Ed.2d 1010, 1015-1016, 87 S.Ct. 1817 ]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 579-580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ]; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; Perez v. Sharp, supra, 32 Cal.2d 711, 714 .) "The Constitution does not require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as though they were the same" ( Tigner v. Texas (1 1968It requires as a minimum that legislative classifications be rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, 8-9 [18 *653 L.Ed.2d 1010, 1015-1016, 87 S.Ct. 1817 ]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 579-580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ]; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; Perez v. Sharp, supra, 32 Cal.2d 711, 714 .) "The Constitution does not require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as though they were the same" ( Tigner v. Texas (1 | 1 | 1 |
Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Williamsongreen2 sentences1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, `stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.' Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ]." ( Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898]; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ]; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ]; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (188 1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, `stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.' Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ]." ( Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898]; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ]; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ]; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (188 | 1 | 1 |
Rinaldi v. Yeagergreen2 sentences1968It requires as a minimum that legislative classifications be rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, 8-9 [18 *653 L.Ed.2d 1010, 1015-1016, 87 S.Ct. 1817 ]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 579-580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ]; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; Perez v. Sharp, supra, 32 Cal.2d 711, 714 .) "The Constitution does not require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as though they were the same" ( Tigner v. Texas (1 1968It requires as a minimum that legislative classifications be rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, 8-9 [18 *653 L.Ed.2d 1010, 1015-1016, 87 S.Ct. 1817 ]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 579-580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ]; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; Perez v. Sharp, supra, 32 Cal.2d 711, 714 .) "The Constitution does not require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as though they were the same" ( Tigner v. Texas (1 | 1 | 1 |
McLaughlin v. Floridagreen2 sentences1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, `stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.' Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ]." ( Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898]; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ]; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ]; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (188 1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, `stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.' Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ]." ( Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898]; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ]; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ]; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (188 | 1 | 1 |
Loving v. Virginiagreen2 sentences1968It requires as a minimum that legislative classifications be rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, 8-9 [18 *653 L.Ed.2d 1010, 1015-1016, 87 S.Ct. 1817 ]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 579-580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ]; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; Perez v. Sharp, supra, 32 Cal.2d 711, 714 .) "The Constitution does not require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as though they were the same" ( Tigner v. Texas (1 1968It requires as a minimum that legislative classifications be rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, 8-9 [18 *653 L.Ed.2d 1010, 1015-1016, 87 S.Ct. 1817 ]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 579-580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ]; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; Perez v. Sharp, supra, 32 Cal.2d 711, 714 .) "The Constitution does not require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as though they were the same" ( Tigner v. Texas (1 | 1 | 1 |
Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examinersgreen2 sentences1968It requires as a minimum that legislative classifications be rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, 8-9 [18 *653 L.Ed.2d 1010, 1015-1016, 87 S.Ct. 1817 ]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 579-580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ]; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; Perez v. Sharp, supra, 32 Cal.2d 711, 714 .) "The Constitution does not require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as though they were the same" ( Tigner v. Texas (1 1968It requires as a minimum that legislative classifications be rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, 8-9 [18 *653 L.Ed.2d 1010, 1015-1016, 87 S.Ct. 1817 ]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 579-580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ]; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; Perez v. Sharp, supra, 32 Cal.2d 711, 714 .) "The Constitution does not require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as though they were the same" ( Tigner v. Texas (1 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mayer v. City of Chicago
green
2 sentences2020(E.g., Burns v. Ohio (1959) 360 U.S. 252 [indigent defendant could not be charged filing fee for motion for leave to appeal to state supreme court from judgment of intermediate appellate court]; Douglas v. California (1963) 372 U.S. 353 (Douglas) [indigent defendants entitled to appointed appellate counsel]; Lane v. Brown (1963) 372 U.S. 477 [unconstitutional to condition free transcript for indigent defendant seeking to appeal from denial of postconviction relief, on consent of public defender]; Roberts v. LaVallee (1967) 389 U.S. 40 [indigent defendant entitled to free transcript of prelimin 2019This court in Dueñas recognized as a basic principle of fairness that the rich and poor should have equal access to the justice system, consistent with the principle underlying the holding in Griffin, supra, 351 U.S. at page 17 , that “all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, ‘stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.’” The United States Supreme Court affirmed this principle in Mayer v. City of Chicago, supra, 404 U.S. at pages 196-198, which held a defendant’s inability to pay for a transcript to appeal a conviction that resulted in imp | 3 | 2019–2020 |
Burns v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2020(E.g., Burns v. Ohio (1959) 360 U.S. 252 [indigent defendant could not be charged filing fee for motion for leave to appeal to state supreme court from judgment of intermediate appellate court]; Douglas v. California (1963) 372 U.S. 353 (Douglas) [indigent defendants entitled to appointed appellate counsel]; Lane v. Brown (1963) 372 U.S. 477 [unconstitutional to condition free transcript for indigent defendant seeking to appeal from denial of postconviction relief, on consent of public defender]; Roberts v. LaVallee (1967) 389 U.S. 40 [indigent defendant entitled to free transcript of prelimin 2020(E.g., Burns v. Ohio (1959) 360 U.S. 252 [indigent defendant could not be charged filing fee for motion for leave to appeal to state supreme court from judgment of intermediate appellate court]; Douglas v. California (1963) 372 U.S. 353 (Douglas) [indigent defendants entitled to appointed appellate counsel]; Lane v. Brown (1963) 372 U.S. 477 [unconstitutional to condition free transcript for indigent defendant seeking to appeal from denial of postconviction relief, on consent of public defender]; Roberts v. LaVallee (1967) 389 U.S. 40 [indigent defendant entitled to free transcript of prelimin | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Roberts v. LaVallee
green
2 sentences2020(E.g., Burns v. Ohio (1959) 360 U.S. 252 [indigent defendant could not be charged filing fee for motion for leave to appeal to state supreme court from judgment of intermediate appellate court]; Douglas v. California (1963) 372 U.S. 353 (Douglas) [indigent defendants entitled to appointed appellate counsel]; Lane v. Brown (1963) 372 U.S. 477 [unconstitutional to condition free transcript for indigent defendant seeking to appeal from denial of postconviction relief, on consent of public defender]; Roberts v. LaVallee (1967) 389 U.S. 40 [indigent defendant entitled to free transcript of prelimin 2020(E.g., Burns v. Ohio (1959) 360 U.S. 252 [indigent defendant could not be charged filing fee for motion for leave to appeal to state supreme court from judgment of intermediate appellate court]; Douglas v. California (1963) 372 U.S. 353 (Douglas) [indigent defendants entitled to appointed appellate counsel]; Lane v. Brown (1963) 372 U.S. 477 [unconstitutional to condition free transcript for indigent defendant seeking to appeal from denial of postconviction relief, on consent of public defender]; Roberts v. LaVallee (1967) 389 U.S. 40 [indigent defendant entitled to free transcript of prelimin | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Lane v. Brown
green
2 sentences2020(E.g., Burns v. Ohio (1959) 360 U.S. 252 [indigent defendant could not be charged filing fee for motion for leave to appeal to state supreme court from judgment of intermediate appellate court]; Douglas v. California (1963) 372 U.S. 353 (Douglas) [indigent defendants entitled to appointed appellate counsel]; Lane v. Brown (1963) 372 U.S. 477 [unconstitutional to condition free transcript for indigent defendant seeking to appeal from denial of postconviction relief, on consent of public defender]; Roberts v. LaVallee (1967) 389 U.S. 40 [indigent defendant entitled to free transcript of prelimin 2020(E.g., Burns v. Ohio (1959) 360 U.S. 252 [indigent defendant could not be charged filing fee for motion for leave to appeal to state supreme court from judgment of intermediate appellate court]; Douglas v. California (1963) 372 U.S. 353 (Douglas) [indigent defendants entitled to appointed appellate counsel]; Lane v. Brown (1963) 372 U.S. 477 [unconstitutional to condition free transcript for indigent defendant seeking to appeal from denial of postconviction relief, on consent of public defender]; Roberts v. LaVallee (1967) 389 U.S. 40 [indigent defendant entitled to free transcript of prelimin | 2 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Neal
green
2 sentences2020They are not supposed to be retributive (to punish the family), rehabilitative (to help the youth) or restorative (to repay victims).’ [Citation.] [This study] also points out that ‘[b]ecause Black and Latino youth are overrepresented and overpunished ... in the juvenile system, families of color bear a disproportionate burden of the fees’ and the inordinate debt these families incur ‘correlates with a greater likelihood of recidivism, even after controlling for case characteristics and youth demographics.’” ( Neal, supra, 29 Cal.App.5th at pp. 827-828, fn. omitted, italics added.) To bear the 2020They are not supposed to be retributive (to punish the family), rehabilitative (to help the youth) or restorative (to repay victims).’ [Citation.] [This study] also points out that ‘[b]ecause Black and Latino youth are overrepresented and overpunished ... in the juvenile system, families of color bear a disproportionate burden of the fees’ and the inordinate debt these families incur ‘correlates with a greater likelihood of recidivism, even after controlling for case characteristics and youth demographics.’” ( Neal, supra, 29 Cal.App.5th at pp. 827-828, fn. omitted, italics added.) To bear the | 2 | 2020–2020 |
In Re Antazo
green
2 sentences2019In In re Antazo (1970) 3 Cal.3d 100 , 89 Cal.Rptr. 255 , 473 P.2d 999 ( Antazo ), the California Supreme Court invalidated the practice of requiring convicted defendants to serve jail time if they were unable to pay a fine and a penalty assessment. ( Id . at p. 103, 89 Cal.Rptr. 255 , 473 P.2d 999 .) "Although a direction for confinement for default in payment of a fine may appear to apply equally to both the rich offender and the poor one, actually the former has the opportunity to escape his confinement while the right of the latter to pay what he cannot, is a hollow one." ( Id . at pp. 103- 2019In In re Antazo (1970) 3 Cal.3d 100 , 89 Cal.Rptr. 255 , 473 P.2d 999 ( Antazo ), the California Supreme Court invalidated the practice of requiring convicted defendants to serve jail time if they were unable to pay a fine and a penalty assessment. ( Id . at p. 103, 89 Cal.Rptr. 255 , 473 P.2d 999 .) "Although a direction for confinement for default in payment of a fine may appear to apply equally to both the rich offender and the poor one, actually the former has the opportunity to escape his confinement while the right of the latter to pay what he cannot, is a hollow one." ( Id . at pp. 103- | 2 | 2019–2019 |
People v. Hosner
green
2 sentences2017(See Hosner , supra , 15 Cal.3d at p. 62 , 123 Cal.Rptr. 381 , 538 P.2d 1141 .) It is simply inconsistent with the purpose of this guarantee to distinguish between transcripts of witness testimony and transcripts of counsel's statements-both of which a wealthy defendant is certain to purchase-when determining whether Hosner 's presumption applies. 2017(See Hosner , supra , 15 Cal.3d at p. 62 , 123 Cal.Rptr. 381 , 538 P.2d 1141 .) It is simply inconsistent with the purpose of this guarantee to distinguish between transcripts of witness testimony and transcripts of counsel's statements-both of which a wealthy defendant is certain to purchase-when determining whether Hosner 's presumption applies. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
March v. Municipal Court
green
1 sentence1981(March v. Municipal Court, supra, 7 Cal.3d 422, 428 ; and see Draper v. Washington (1963) 372 U.S. 487, 499 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 899, 907 , 83 S.Ct. 774 ].) Although there was some earlier authority to the contrary, it became settled that no distinction will be drawn between the rights of indigent, and nonindigent, persons convicted of felonies who have appealed their convictions, to have an appropriate record on appeal furnished at the expense of the state. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Cannon v. United States
green
2 sentences1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system—all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, ' stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court. ’ Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ].” (Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898] ; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ] ; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ] ; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1 1968Both equal protection and due process emphasize the central aim of our entire judicial system all people charged with crime must, so far as the law is concerned, `stand on an equality before the bar of justice in every American court.' Chambers v. Florida (1940) 309 U.S. 227, 241 [ 84 L.Ed. 716, 724 , 60 S.Ct. 472 ]." ( Griffin v. Illinois, supra, 351 U.S. 12, 17 [ 100 L.Ed. 891 , 898]; Douglas v. California, supra, 372 U.S. 353, 356-358 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 811, 814-815 ]; Truax v. Corrigan (1921) 257 U.S. 312, 331-333 [ 66 L.Ed. 254, 262-263 , 42 S.Ct. 124 , 27 A.L.R. 375 ]; Yick Wo v. Hopkins (188 | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Perez v. Sharp
green
1 sentence1968It requires as a minimum that legislative classifications be rationally related to a legitimate governmental purpose. ( Loving v. Virginia (1967) 388 U.S. 1, 8-9 [18 *653 L.Ed.2d 1010, 1015-1016, 87 S.Ct. 1817 ]; Rinaldi v. Yeager (1966) 384 U.S. 305, 308-309 [ 16 L.Ed.2d 577, 579-580 , 86 S.Ct. 1497 ]; Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 233 [ 18 Cal. Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ]; Perez v. Sharp, supra, 32 Cal.2d 711, 714 .) "The Constitution does not require things which are different in fact ... to be treated in law as though they were the same" ( Tigner v. Texas (1 | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.