10 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Christopher Simmondsgreen1 sentence2018People v. Ujaama, 2012 COA 36, ¶ 38 . ¶ 41 Plain error “provide[s] a basis for relief only on rare occasions,” in part because “it is difficult to ‘fault a trial court for failing to rule on an issue that had not been presented to it.’” Id. at ¶ 40 (quoting United States v. Simmonds, 931 F.2d 685, 688 (10th Cir. 1991)). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Gordongreen1 sentence2017See People v. Gordon , 32 P.3d 575 , 581 (Colo. App. 2001). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Brittgreen1 sentence2010People v. O'Connell, 134 P.3d 460, 464 (Colo.App.2005); cf. United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 59 , 122 S.Ct. 1043 , 152 L.Ed.2d 90 (2002) (concluding that unobject-ed-to error in trial court's guilty plea colloquy was reversible only upon a showing of plain error that affected the defendant's substantial rights, and that a reviewing court may consult the whole record when considering the effect of any error on substantial rights); see Mosly, 672 N.W.2d at 901 (reversal is "not warranted on the basis of an unpreserved constitutional error unless the error was plain on the record and affected | 1 | 1 |
People v. O'CONNELLgreen1 sentence2010People v. O'Connell, 134 P.3d 460, 464 (Colo.App.2005); cf. United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 59 , 122 S.Ct. 1043 , 152 L.Ed.2d 90 (2002) (concluding that unobject-ed-to error in trial court's guilty plea colloquy was reversible only upon a showing of plain error that affected the defendant's substantial rights, and that a reviewing court may consult the whole record when considering the effect of any error on substantial rights); see Mosly, 672 N.W.2d at 901 (reversal is "not warranted on the basis of an unpreserved constitutional error unless the error was plain on the record and affected | 1 | 1 |
People v. Carinesgreen2 sentences2010People v. O'Connell, 134 P.3d 460, 464 (Colo.App.2005); cf. United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 59 , 122 S.Ct. 1043 , 152 L.Ed.2d 90 (2002) (concluding that unobject-ed-to error in trial court's guilty plea colloquy was reversible only upon a showing of plain error that affected the defendant's substantial rights, and that a reviewing court may consult the whole record when considering the effect of any error on substantial rights); see Mosly, 672 N.W.2d at 901 (reversal is "not warranted on the basis of an unpreserved constitutional error unless the error was plain on the record and affected 2010People v. O'Connell, 134 P.3d 460, 464 (Colo.App.2005); cf. United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 59 , 122 S.Ct. 1043 , 152 L.Ed.2d 90 (2002) (concluding that unobject-ed-to error in trial court's guilty plea colloquy was reversible only upon a showing of plain error that affected the defendant's substantial rights, and that a reviewing court may consult the whole record when considering the effect of any error on substantial rights); see Mosly, 672 N.W.2d at 901 (reversal is "not warranted on the basis of an unpreserved constitutional error unless the error was plain on the record and affected | 1 | 1 |
People v. Kennygreen1 sentence2003See People v. Kenny, 30 P.3d 734, 741-42 (Colo.App.2000). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Quintanagreen1 sentence1992See People v. Quintana, 701 P.2d 1264 (Colo.App.1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Constant
green
2 sentences1985People v. Constant, 645 P.2d 843 (Colo.1982); People v. Trujillo, 682 P.2d 499 (Colo.App.1984). 1984People v. Constant, 645 P.2d 843 (Colo.1982). | 2 | 1984–1985 |
People v. Ujaama
green
2 sentences2018People v. Ujaama, 2012 COA 36, ¶ 38 . ¶ 41 Plain error “provide[s] a basis for relief only on rare occasions,” in part because “it is difficult to ‘fault a trial court for failing to rule on an issue that had not been presented to it.’” Id. at ¶ 40 (quoting United States v. Simmonds, 931 F.2d 685, 688 (10th Cir. 1991)). 2018People v. Ujaama, 2012 COA 36, ¶ 38 . ¶ 41 Plain error “provide[s] a basis for relief only on rare occasions,” in part because “it is difficult to ‘fault a trial court for failing to rule on an issue that had not been presented to it.’” Id. at ¶ 40 (quoting United States v. Simmonds, 931 F.2d 685, 688 (10th Cir. 1991)). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
United States v. Vonn
green
2 sentences2010People v. O'Connell, 134 P.3d 460, 464 (Colo.App.2005); cf. United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 59 , 122 S.Ct. 1043 , 152 L.Ed.2d 90 (2002) (concluding that unobject-ed-to error in trial court's guilty plea colloquy was reversible only upon a showing of plain error that affected the defendant's substantial rights, and that a reviewing court may consult the whole record when considering the effect of any error on substantial rights); see Mosly, 672 N.W.2d at 901 (reversal is "not warranted on the basis of an unpreserved constitutional error unless the error was plain on the record and affected 2010People v. O'Connell, 134 P.3d 460, 464 (Colo.App.2005); cf. United States v. Vonn, 535 U.S. 55, 59 , 122 S.Ct. 1043 , 152 L.Ed.2d 90 (2002) (concluding that unobject-ed-to error in trial court's guilty plea colloquy was reversible only upon a showing of plain error that affected the defendant's substantial rights, and that a reviewing court may consult the whole record when considering the effect of any error on substantial rights); see Mosly, 672 N.W.2d at 901 (reversal is "not warranted on the basis of an unpreserved constitutional error unless the error was plain on the record and affected | 1 | 2010–2010 |
People v. Rubanowitz
green
1 sentence1986People v. Barker, supra. A showing of plain error requires that defendant “demonstrate not only that the record reveals that [the error] affected a substantial right but that also the record reveals a reasonable possibility that the error contributed to his conviction.” People v. Rubanowitz, 688 P.2d 231 (1984). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
People v. Trujillo
green
1 sentence1985People v. Constant, 645 P.2d 843 (Colo.1982); People v. Trujillo, 682 P.2d 499 (Colo.App.1984). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Lucero v. People
neutral
2 sentences1981E.g., People v. Taggart, Colo., 621 P.2d 1375 (1981); People v. Quintana, 189 Colo. 330 , 540 P.2d 1097 (1975); Lucero v. People, 158 Colo. 568 , 409 P.2d 278 (1965). 1981E.g., People v. Taggart, Colo., 621 P.2d 1375 (1981); People v. Quintana, 189 Colo. 330 , 540 P.2d 1097 (1975); Lucero v. People, 158 Colo. 568 , 409 P.2d 278 (1965). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
People v. Taggart
green
1 sentence1981E.g., People v. Taggart, Colo., 621 P.2d 1375 (1981); People v. Quintana, 189 Colo. 330 , 540 P.2d 1097 (1975); Lucero v. People, 158 Colo. 568 , 409 P.2d 278 (1965). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
People v. Quintana
green
2 sentences1981E.g., People v. Taggart, Colo., 621 P.2d 1375 (1981); People v. Quintana, 189 Colo. 330 , 540 P.2d 1097 (1975); Lucero v. People, 158 Colo. 568 , 409 P.2d 278 (1965). 1981E.g., People v. Taggart, Colo., 621 P.2d 1375 (1981); People v. Quintana, 189 Colo. 330 , 540 P.2d 1097 (1975); Lucero v. People, 158 Colo. 568 , 409 P.2d 278 (1965). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Messer v. People
neutral
1 sentence1975Messer v. People, 65 Colo. 435 , 176 P. 828 (1918). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.