Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
24 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1982–2026 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Diament v. Diamentgreen2 sentences2025We apply the following principles in assessing such claims. - 10 - J-S15003-25 “Our ability to review the grant of attorney[s'] fees is limited, and we will reverse only upon a showing of plain error.” Diament v. Diament, 816 A.2d 256, 270 (Pa. Super. 2003) (citation omitted). 2021Our ability to review the grant of attorney[s'] fees is limited, and we will reverse only upon a showing of plain error.” Diament v. Diament, 816 A.2d 256, 270 (Pa. Super. 2003) (citation omitted). | 8 | 10 |
Habjan v. Habjangreen2 sentences2026Habjan v. Habjan, 73 A.3d 630, 642 (Pa.Super. 2013) (internal quotation marks, citations, and brackets omitted). 2025Habjan v. Habjan, 73 A.3d 630, 642 (Pa.Super. 2013) (internal quotation marks, citations, and brackets omitted). | 5 | 5 |
Isralsky v. Isralskygreen2 sentences2023An abuse of discretion is “[n]ot merely an error of judgment, but if in reaching a conclusion[,] the law is overridden or misapplied, or the judgment exercised is manifestly unreasonable, or the result of partiality, prejudice, bias or ill-will, as shown by the evidence of record.” Id. (citations omitted). “[R]eview of the grant of counsel fees is limited...and we will reverse only upon a showing of plain error.” Isralsky v. Isralsky, 824 A.2d 1178, 1192 (Pa.Super. 2003) (citation omitted). 2018An abuse of discretion is “[n]ot merely an error of judgment, but if in reaching a conclusion[,] the law is overridden or misapplied, or the judgment exercised is manifestly unreasonable, or the result of partiality, prejudice, bias or ill-will, as shown by the evidence of record.” Id. (citations omitted). “[R]eview of the grant of counsel fees is limited . . . and we will reverse only upon a showing of plain error.” Isralsky v. Isralsky, 824 A.2d 1178, 1192 (Pa.Super. 2003) (citation omitted). | 5 | 5 |
Kraisinger v. Kraisingergreen2 sentences2023Habjan v. Habjan, 73 A.3d 630, 642 (Pa.Super. 2013) (quoting Kraisinger v. Kraisinger, 34 A.3d 168, 175 (Pa.Super. 2011)). 2018Kraisinger v. Kraisinger, 34 A.3d 168, 175 (Pa.Super. 2011). | 5 | 5 |
GILMORE BY GILMORE v. Donderogreen2 sentences2009Gilmore v. Dondero, 399 Pa. Super. 599 , [606,] 582 A.2d 1106, 1109 (1990). 2009Gilmore v. Dondero, 399 Pa. Super. 599 , [606,] 582 A.2d 1106, 1109 (1990). | 4 | 4 |
Holz v. Holzgreen1 sentence2022Plain error is found where the decision is based on factual findings with no support in the evidentiary [record] or legal factors other than those that are relevant to such an award. ____________________________________________ 12We offer no opinion as to whether Appellant should be granted the additional requested commission. - 29 - J-A26038-21 Holz v. Holz, 850 A.2d 751, 760 (Pa. Super. 2004) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Sirio v. Siriogreen2 sentences2022“Our ability to review the grant of attorney’s fees is limited, and we will reverse only upon a showing of plain error.” Sirio v. Sirio, 951 A.2d 1188, 1198 (Pa. Super. 2008) (citations omitted). 2022“Plain error is found where the decision is based on factual findings with no support in the [evidence] or legal factors other than those that are relevant to such an award.” Id. at 1198-99 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bowser v. Blom
green
2 sentences2023An abuse of discretion is “[n]ot merely an error of judgment, but if in reaching a conclusion[,] the law is overridden or misapplied, or the judgment exercised is manifestly unreasonable, or the result of partiality, prejudice, bias or ill-will, as shown by the evidence of record.” Id. (citations omitted). “[R]eview of the grant of counsel fees is limited...and we will reverse only upon a showing of plain error.” Isralsky v. Isralsky, 824 A.2d 1178, 1192 (Pa.Super. 2003) (citation omitted). 2018An abuse of discretion is “[n]ot merely an error of judgment, but if in reaching a conclusion[,] the law is overridden or misapplied, or the judgment exercised is manifestly unreasonable, or the result of partiality, prejudice, bias or ill-will, as shown by the evidence of record.” Id. (citations omitted). “[R]eview of the grant of counsel fees is limited . . . and we will reverse only upon a showing of plain error.” Isralsky v. Isralsky, 824 A.2d 1178, 1192 (Pa.Super. 2003) (citation omitted). | 5 | 2011–2023 |
Teodorski v. Teodorski
green
1 sentence2009“Further, in determining whether the court has abused its discre *900 tion, we do not usurp the court’s duty as fact finder.” Id. ¶ 19 Stated differently, “[o]ur ability to review the grant of attorney’s fees is limited, and we will reverse only upon a showing of plain error.” Diament v. Diament, 816 A.2d 256, 270 (Pa.Super.2003) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Palladino v. Palladino
green
1 sentence2004Lastly, Husband contends that the court should have offset the amount Wife received for the $24,826 sur-vivorship benefit with an amount for attorney fees pursuant to Palladino, supra. Our ability to review the grant of attorney’s fees is limited, and we will reverse only upon a showing of plain error. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Martinique Shoes, Inc. v. New York Progressive Wood Heel Co.
green
2 sentences2003Martinique Shoes, Inc. v. New York Progressive Wood Heel Co., 207 Pa.Super. 404 , 217 A.2d 781 (1966). ¶ 17 Additionally, our ability to review the grant of attorney’s fees is limited, and we will reverse only upon a showing of plain error. 2003Martinique Shoes, Inc. v. New York Progressive Wood Heel Co., 207 Pa.Super. 404 , 217 A.2d 781 (1966). ¶ 17 Additionally, our ability to review the grant of attorney’s fees is limited, and we will reverse only upon a showing of plain error. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Yentzer v. Taylor Wine Co.
green
2 sentences1982Amendments to pleadings lie within the sound discretion of the court, Yentzer v. Taylor Wine Co., 409 Pa. 338 , 186 A.2d 396 (1962), and will not be .overtqrned on appeal absent a showing of plain error. 1982Amendments to pleadings lie within the sound discretion of the court, Yentzer v. Taylor Wine Co., 409 Pa. 338 , 186 A.2d 396 (1962), and will not be .overtqrned on appeal absent a showing of plain error. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
BELL v. Shetrom
green
2 sentences1982Bell v. Shetrom, 214 Pa. Superior Ct. 309 , 257 A.2d 323 (1969). 1982Bell v. Shetrom, 214 Pa. Superior Ct. 309 , 257 A.2d 323 (1969). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.