charges bar (Nebraska) · Go Syfert
← Nebraska issues

charges bar in Nebraska

76 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1950–2025 20 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (11)

CaseFollowedCited
Weber v. Webergreen
neb · 1978 · cited in 5 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 1978–1993
2 sentences

1993The factors to consider in determining the value of legal services rendered by an attorney are set forth in Weber v. Weber, 200 Neb. 659, 671 , 265 N.W.2d 436, 443 (1978): The award of attorney’s fees involves consideration of such factors as the nature of the case, the amount involved in the controversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation of the case, the skill devoted to preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services.

1993The factors to consider in determining the value of legal services rendered by an attorney are set forth in Weber v. Weber, 200 Neb. 659, 671 , 265 N.W.2d 436, 443 (1978): The award of attorney’s fees involves consideration of such factors as the nature of the case, the amount involved in the controversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation of the case, the skill devoted to preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services.

25
In Re Guardianship of Donleygreen
neb · 2001 · cited in 3 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2005–2018
2 sentences

2018See In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Donley, 262 Neb. 282 , 631 N.W.2d 839 (2001).

2018See In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Donley, 262 Neb. 282 , 631 N.W.2d 839 (2001).

23
Garza v. Garzagreen
neb · 2014 · cited in 11 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2014–2025
2 sentences

2025See Garza v. Garza, 288 Neb. 213 , 846 N.W.2d 626 (2014). [26] It has been held that in awarding attorney fees in a dis- solution action, a court shall consider the nature of the case, the amount involved in the controversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and diffi- culty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services.

2024Garza v. Garza, 288 Neb. 213 , 846 N.W.2d 626 (2014).

111
Schirber v. State Ex Rel. Thomasgreen
neb · 1998 · cited in 5 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 1999–2015
2 sentences

2015Id. (citing Koehler v. Farmers Alliance Mut.

2005See, In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of Donley, 262 Neb. 282 , 631 N.W.2d 839 (2001); Schirber v. State, 254 Neb. 1002 , 581 N.W.2d 873 (1998). *383 It is true that this court has never specifically approved the “lodestar multiplier” approach to calculating court-ordered attorney fees.

15
Hauptman, O'Brien, Wolf & Lathrop, P.C. v. Milwaukee Guardiangreen
nebctapp · 1998 · cited in 3 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 1999–2006
2 sentences

2006Id.

2001App. 60 , 578 N.W.2d 83 (1998), is the customary charges of the bar for similar work.

13
Pfeiffer v. Pfeiffergreen
neb · 1979 · cited in 3 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 1979–1988
2 sentences

1988In Pfeiffer v. Pfeiffer, 203 Neb. 137, 142-43 , 277 N.W.2d 575, 578 (1979), the court stated: *301 An award of attorney’s fees in an action for dissolution of marriage involves consideration of such factors as the nature of the case, the amount involved in the controversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services.

1988In Pfeiffer v. Pfeiffer, 203 Neb. 137, 142-43 , 277 N.W.2d 575, 578 (1979), the court stated: *301 An award of attorney’s fees in an action for dissolution of marriage involves consideration of such factors as the nature of the case, the amount involved in the controversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services.

13
In re Claim of Roberts for Attorney Feesgreen
neb · 2020 · cited in 2 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2020–2021
2 sentences

2021In re Claim of Roberts for Attorney Fees, 307 Neb. 346 , 949 N.W.2d 299 (2020).

2020When fixing reasonable fees, a court considers several factors: the nature of the litigation, the time and labor required, the nov- elty and difficulty of the questions raised, the skill required to properly conduct the case, the responsibility assumed, the care and diligence exhibited, the result of the suit, the character and standing of the attor- ney, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. - 348 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 307 Nebraska Reports IN RE CLAIM OF ROBERTS FOR ATTORNEY FEES Cite as 307 Neb. 346 15.

12
Brumbaugh v. Bendorfgreen
neb · 2020 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020An award of attorney fees involves consideration of such factors as the nature of the case, the services performed and results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the customary charges of the bar, and general equities of the case. - 251 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports BRUMBAUGH v. BENDORF Cite as 306 Neb. 250 10.

11
Neeman v. Otoe Countygreen
neb · 1971 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
2 sentences

2020The affidavit by Sellers’ attorney stated 22 See Black, supra note 7. 23 Neeman v. Otoe County, 186 Neb. 370, 376 , 183 N.W.2d 269, 273 (1971). 24 See, Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist, 301 Neb. 256 , 918 N.W.2d 273 (2018); Kercher v. Board of Regents, 290 Neb. 428 , 860 N.W.2d 398 (2015). - 878 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports SELLERS v. REEFER SYSTEMS Cite as 305 Neb. 868 the total number of hours and the applicable rate, and it presented an expert opinion that both were reasonable.

2020The affidavit by Sellers’ attorney stated 22 See Black, supra note 7. 23 Neeman v. Otoe County, 186 Neb. 370, 376 , 183 N.W.2d 269, 273 (1971). 24 See, Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist, 301 Neb. 256 , 918 N.W.2d 273 (2018); Kercher v. Board of Regents, 290 Neb. 428 , 860 N.W.2d 398 (2015). - 878 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports SELLERS v. REEFER SYSTEMS Cite as 305 Neb. 868 the total number of hours and the applicable rate, and it presented an expert opinion that both were reasonable.

11
State v. Ricegreen
neb · 2016 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
11
Barnes v. Barnesgreen
neb · 1974 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 1978–1978
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (38)

CaseCitedYears
Moore v. Moore green
neb · 2019
2 sentences

2024Id.

2021Id.

52020–2024
Dycus v. Dycus green
neb · 2020
2 sentences

2021In awarding attorney fees in a dissolution action, a court shall consider the nature of the case, the amount involved in the con- troversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 21 In addi- tion, courts have the inherent power to award attorney fees in certain unusual circumstances amounting to conduct during the course of litigation which is vexatious, unfounded, and dila- tory, such that it am

2021In awarding attorney fees in a dissolution action, a court shall consider the nature of the case, the amount involved in the con- troversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 21 In addi- tion, courts have the inherent power to award attorney fees in certain unusual circumstances amounting to conduct during the course of litigation which is vexatious, unfounded, and dila- tory, such that it am

42020–2023
Fetherkile v. Fetherkile green
neb · 2018
2 sentences

2021In awarding attorney fees in a dissolution action, a court shall consider the nature of the case, the amount involved in the con- troversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 21 In addi- tion, courts have the inherent power to award attorney fees in certain unusual circumstances amounting to conduct during the course of litigation which is vexatious, unfounded, and dila- tory, such that it am

2018He argues that under the relevant considerations for granting attorney fees, the circumstances of this case did not warrant making an award—in light of the short duration of the parties’ marriage, the simplicity of issues in the dissolution, and both parties’ lack of financial resources. [34,35] In awarding attorney fees in a dissolution action, a court should consider the nature of the case, the amount involved in the controversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for prepara- tion and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the

32018–2021
Brozek v. Brozek green
neb · 2016
2 sentences

2017Brozek v. Brozek, 292 Neb. 681 , 874 N.W.2d 17 (2016).

2017Brozek v. Brozek, 292 Neb. 681 , 874 N.W.2d 17 (2016).

32016–2017
Vlach v. Vlach green
neb · 2013
2 sentences

2016Vlach v. Vlach, 286 Neb. 141 , 835 N.W.2d 72 (2013).

2016Vlach v. Vlach, 286 Neb. 141 , 835 N.W.2d 72 (2013).

32013–2016
Allen v. City of Omaha green
neb · 1939
2 sentences

1950In Allen v. City of Omaha, 136 Neb. 620 , 286 N. W. 916 , it was held: “In determining the value of legal services rendered by an attorney, it is proper to consider the amount involved, the nature of the litigation, the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised and the skill required to properly conduct the case, the responsibility assumed, the care and diligence exhibited, the result of the suit, the character and standing of the attorney, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services.” See, also, Darnell v. City of Broken Bow, 139 Neb. 844 , 299

1950In Allen v. City of Omaha, 136 Neb. 620 , 286 N. W. 916 , it was held: “In determining the value of legal services rendered by an attorney, it is proper to consider the amount involved, the nature of the litigation, the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised and the skill required to properly conduct the case, the responsibility assumed, the care and diligence exhibited, the result of the suit, the character and standing of the attorney, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services.” See, also, Darnell v. City of Broken Bow, 139 Neb. 844 , 299

31950–1977
Cornwell v. Cornwell green
neb · 2021
2 sentences

2021In awarding attorney fees in a dissolution action, a court shall consider the nature of the case, the amount involved - 157 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports CORNWELL v. CORNWELL Cite as 309 Neb. 156 in the controversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 7.

2021In awarding attorney fees in a dissolution action, a court shall consider the nature of the case, the amount involved in the con- troversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 21 In addi- tion, courts have the inherent power to award attorney fees in certain unusual circumstances amounting to conduct during the course of litigation which is vexatious, unfounded, and dila- tory, such that it am

22021–2024
State v. Blake green
neb · 2022
2 sentences

2022Blake affirmed that he understood the charges and that defense - 777 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports STATE v. BLAKE Cite as 310 Neb. 769 counsel had discussed with him all the possible defenses he might have if he were to instead go to trial.

2022Blake affirmed that he understood the charges and that defense - 777 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports STATE v. BLAKE Cite as 310 Neb. 769 counsel had discussed with him all the possible defenses he might have if he were to instead go to trial.

22022–2022
ACI Worldwide Corp. v. Baldwin Hackett & Meeks green
neb · 2017
2 sentences

2020Id.

2017When an attorney fee is authorized, the amount of the fee is addressed to the trial court’s discretion, and its ruling will not be dis- turbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion.91 An award of attorney fees involves consideration of such factors as the nature of the case, the services performed and results obtained, 90 Black v. Brooks, 285 Neb. 440 , 827 N.W.2d 256 (2013). 91 See cases cited supra note 13. - 882 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 296 Nebraska R eports ACI WORLDWIDE CORP. v. BALDWIN HACKETT & MEEKS Cite as 296 Neb. 818 the length of time required for preparation and

22017–2020
In re Estate of Forgey green
neb · 2018
2 sentences

2018To determine the value of legal services rendered by an attorney, it is proper to consider the amount involved, the nature of the litigation, the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, the skill required to properly conduct the case, the - 867 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 298 Nebraska R eports IN RE ESTATE OF FORGEY Cite as 298 Neb. 865 responsibility assumed, the care and diligence exhibited, the result of the suit, the character and standing of the attorney, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 22.

2018As a result, we find that the county court abused its discretion by not awarding attorney fees to Marvel and Bessie. [21] We have previously found that to determine the value of legal services rendered by an attorney, it is proper to - 894 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 298 Nebraska R eports IN RE ESTATE OF FORGEY Cite as 298 Neb. 865 consider the amount involved, the nature of the litigation, the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the ques- tions raised, the skill required to properly conduct the case, the responsibility assumed, the care and diligence exhibited,

22018–2018
Priest v. Priest green
neb · 1996
2 sentences

1998Priest v. Priest, 251 Neb. 76 , 554 N.W.2d 792 (1996).

1998Priest v. Priest, 251 Neb. 76 , 554 N.W.2d 792 (1996).

21997–1998
Seemann v. Seemann green
neb · 2024
1 sentence

2025Seemann v Seemann, 316 Neb. 671 , 6 N.W.3d 502 (2024).

12025–2025
McReynolds v. McReynolds green
nebctapp · 2025
1 sentence

2025Id.

12025–2025
Scott v. Scott green
neb · 2025
2 sentences

2025SCOTT Cite as 319 Neb. 877 Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: Susan I.

2025SCOTT Cite as 319 Neb. 877 for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 70 Here, because both parties assert the case was compli- cated, we presume that it was such.

12025–2025
Mosher v. Whole Foods Market green
neb · 2024
1 sentence

2024WHOLE FOODS MARKET Cite as 317 Neb. 26 standing of the attorney, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 41 According to Whole Foods, the amount of the attorney fees is unreasonable because it is approximately 60 percent of Mosher’s present recovery under the award.

12024–2024
Parde v. Parde green
nebctapp · 2022
1 sentence

2023Id.

12023–2023
In re Henry B. Wilson, Jr., Revocable Trust neutral
nebctapp · 2021
1 sentence

2021Id.

12021–2021
Leners v. Leners green
neb · 2019
2 sentences

2021In awarding attorney fees in a dissolution action, a court shall consider the nature of the case, the amount involved in the con- troversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 21 In addi- tion, courts have the inherent power to award attorney fees in certain unusual circumstances amounting to conduct during the course of litigation which is vexatious, unfounded, and dila- tory, such that it am

2021In awarding attorney fees in a dissolution action, a court shall consider the nature of the case, the amount involved in the con- troversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 21 In addi- tion, courts have the inherent power to award attorney fees in certain unusual circumstances amounting to conduct during the course of litigation which is vexatious, unfounded, and dila- tory, such that it am

12021–2021
State on behalf of Kaaden S. v. Jeffery T. green
neb · 2019
2 sentences

2021In awarding attorney fees in a dissolution action, a court shall consider the nature of the case, the amount involved in the con- troversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 21 In addi- tion, courts have the inherent power to award attorney fees in certain unusual circumstances amounting to conduct during the course of litigation which is vexatious, unfounded, and dila- tory, such that it am

2021In awarding attorney fees in a dissolution action, a court shall consider the nature of the case, the amount involved in the con- troversy, the services actually performed, the results obtained, the length of time required for preparation and presentation of the case, the novelty and difficulty of the questions raised, and the customary charges of the bar for similar services. 21 In addi- tion, courts have the inherent power to award attorney fees in certain unusual circumstances amounting to conduct during the course of litigation which is vexatious, unfounded, and dila- tory, such that it am

12021–2021
Sellers v. Reefer Systems green
neb · 2020
1 sentence

2020The affidavit by Sellers’ attorney stated 22 See Black, supra note 7. 23 Neeman v. Otoe County, 186 Neb. 370, 376 , 183 N.W.2d 269, 273 (1971). 24 See, Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist, 301 Neb. 256 , 918 N.W.2d 273 (2018); Kercher v. Board of Regents, 290 Neb. 428 , 860 N.W.2d 398 (2015). - 878 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports SELLERS v. REEFER SYSTEMS Cite as 305 Neb. 868 the total number of hours and the applicable rate, and it presented an expert opinion that both were reasonable.

12020–2020
Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist Inc. green
neb · 2018
2 sentences

2020The affidavit by Sellers’ attorney stated 22 See Black, supra note 7. 23 Neeman v. Otoe County, 186 Neb. 370, 376 , 183 N.W.2d 269, 273 (1971). 24 See, Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist, 301 Neb. 256 , 918 N.W.2d 273 (2018); Kercher v. Board of Regents, 290 Neb. 428 , 860 N.W.2d 398 (2015). - 878 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports SELLERS v. REEFER SYSTEMS Cite as 305 Neb. 868 the total number of hours and the applicable rate, and it presented an expert opinion that both were reasonable.

2020The affidavit by Sellers’ attorney stated 22 See Black, supra note 7. 23 Neeman v. Otoe County, 186 Neb. 370, 376 , 183 N.W.2d 269, 273 (1971). 24 See, Pan v. IOC Realty Specialist, 301 Neb. 256 , 918 N.W.2d 273 (2018); Kercher v. Board of Regents, 290 Neb. 428 , 860 N.W.2d 398 (2015). - 878 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports SELLERS v. REEFER SYSTEMS Cite as 305 Neb. 868 the total number of hours and the applicable rate, and it presented an expert opinion that both were reasonable.

12020–2020
Anderson v. Anderson green
nebctapp · 2019
12019–2019
Bower v. Eaton Corp. green
neb · 2018
12018–2018
In Re Estate of Stull green
neb · 2001
12015–2015
State Ex Rel. Mooney v. Duer green
nebctapp · 1992
12000–2000
Davidson v. Davidson green
neb · 1998
12000–2000
Zimmerman v. FirsTier Bank, N.A. green
neb · 1998
11999–1999
Venter v. Venter green
neb · 1996
11997–1997
Murrell v. Murrell green
neb · 1989
11996–1996
Ruby Cooperative Co. v. Farmers Elevator Mutual Insurance green
neb · 1977
11991–1991
Smith v. Union Insurance neutral
neb · 1984
11987–1987
Pittman v. Pittman green
neb · 1984
11984–1984
Campbell v. Campbell green
neb · 1979
11980–1980
Morris v. Morris neutral
neb · 1978
11979–1979
Junker v. Junker green
neb · 1972
11978–1978
Fotinos v. Fotinos neutral
neb · 1969
11978–1978
Holmes v. Holmes green
neb · 1950
11978–1978
Darnell v. City of Broken Bow green
neb · 1941
11950–1950

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-365 (26) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-2923 (11) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-364 (9) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 24-1106 (6) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-2922 (5) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 44-359 (5) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 2-109 (4) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 4-204 (4) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-351 (4) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 42-366 (4) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-125 (4) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-3893 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NE 76 (1950–2025) NY 46 (1916–2019) CA 27 (1932–2026) TX 22 (1925–2025) TN 20 (1978–2024) OH 15 (1944–2025) MI 12 (1936–2022) PA 12 (1969–2026) GA 10 (1902–2025) IL 8 (1967–2025) FL 7 (1949–2020) CO 7 (1984–2015) NJ 6 (1980–2021) AL 6 (1954–1981) DE 6 (1997–2026) KY 6 (2013–2016) LA 5 (1983–2002) MD 5 (1984–2021) MA 5 (1981–2015) MO 4 (1971–1999) AR 3 (2010–2020) AZ 3 (1972–1994) VI 3 (1983–1985) NM 3 (2010–2022) MS 3 (1953–2019) IN 3 (1963–2020) WA 3 (1920–2025) CT 3 (1993–2002) MT 2 (2012–2025) OK 2 (2016–2016) RI 2 (1989–2015) NC 2 (2007–2012) ME 2 (2018–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check