issue of standing challenge in Florida

10 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2001 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

Case	Followed	Cited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

Case	Cited	Years
Thompson v. State green fladistctapp · 1998 2 sentences 2001We have for review Parrish v. State, 760 So.2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), approved, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. 2000We have for review Watson v. State, 763 So.2d 1143 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	8	2000–2001
State v. Thompson green fla · 1999 2 sentences 2001We have for review Parrish v. State, 760 So.2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), approved, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. 2000We have for review Bronson v. State, 751 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), and Bronson v. State, 751 So.2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), 1 wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), approved, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	5	2000–2001
Heggs v. State green fladistctapp · 1998 2 sentences 2000We have for review Schumaker v. State, 758 So.2d 1200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. 2000We have for review Ferrell v. State, 753 So.2d 694 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), which is in express and direct conflict with the Second District's decision in Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), certified appeal decided, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), on the issue of standing to challenge 95-184, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	2	2000–2000
Parrish v. State neutral fladistctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2001We have for review Parrish v. State, 760 So.2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), approved, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	1	2001–2001
Busby v. State green fladistctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2000The Court has for review Busby v. State, 766 So.2d 259 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	1	2000–2000
Heggs v. State green fla · 2000 1 sentence 2000We have for review Ferrell v. State, 753 So.2d 694 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), which is in express and direct conflict with the Second District's decision in Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), certified appeal decided, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), on the issue of standing to challenge 95-184, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	1	2000–2000
Venero v. State green fladistctapp · 1999 1 sentence 2000We have for review Venero v. State, 741 So.2d 1189 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), wherein the district court certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), approved, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, on single subject rule grounds.	1	2000–2000
Ferrell v. State neutral fladistctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2000We have for review Ferrell v. State, 753 So.2d 694 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), which is in express and direct conflict with the Second District's decision in Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), certified appeal decided, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), on the issue of standing to challenge 95-184, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	1	2000–2000
Brown v. State green fladistctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2000We have for review Brown v. State, 753 So.2d 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), approved, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule eon- tained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	1	2000–2000
Schumaker v. State neutral fladistctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2000We have for review Schumaker v. State, 758 So.2d 1200 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with Heggs v. State, 718 So.2d 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	1	2000–2000
Dixon v. State green fladistctapp · 1999 1 sentence 2000We have for review Dixon v. State, 745 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District's decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	1	2000–2000
Bronson v. State neutral fladistctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2000We have for review Bronson v. State, 751 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), and Bronson v. State, 751 So.2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), 1 wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), approved, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	1	2000–2000
Bronson v. State green fladistctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2000We have for review Bronson v. State, 751 So.2d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), and Bronson v. State, 751 So.2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), 1 wherein the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), approved, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	1	2000–2000
Osborne v. State neutral fladistctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2000We have for review Osborne v. State, 766 So.2d 286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), approved, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	1	2000–2000
Watson v. State green fladistctapp · 2000 1 sentence 2000We have for review Watson v. State, 763 So.2d 1143 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), in which the Fourth District Court of Appeal certified conflict with the Second District’s decision in Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998), on the issue of standing to challenge chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida, as violative of the single subject rule contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.	1	2000–2000

Statutes the citing opinions construe

FL § 775.084 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

FL 10 (2000–2001) PA 7 (1987–2019) IL 3 (2014–2014) OH 2 (1998–2007) TX 2 (1998–2009) CO 2 (1982–1984)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check