Parrish v. State, 760 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Parrish v. State, 760 So. 2d 160 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vincent PARRISH
v.
STATE of Florida
No. 4D97-4409.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Feb 16, 2000.
760 So. 2d 160
2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1355
2000 WL 172567
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Joseph R. Chloupek, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant., Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Gentry Denise Benjamin, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Gunther, Shahood, Taylor.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

TAYLOR, J.

AFFIRMED. See Watson v. State, No. 97-2868, - So.2d -, 2000 WL 86237 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan.19, 2000); Salters v. State, 731 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), rev. granted, 749 So.2d 503 (Fla.1999).

GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Rehearing

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing. However, we certify to the supreme court that our holding as to the window of opportunity to challenge Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida on single subject grounds, as announced in Salters v. State, 731 So.2d 826 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), rev. granted, 749 So.2d 503 (Fla. 1999), conflicts with Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), rev. granted, 111 So.2d 538 (Fla.1998). See State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999)(declining to rule on the applicable window period for challenging Chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida on single subject rule grounds).

GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.