10 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1975–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ivory v. Stategreen2 sentences1998The Williams court considered two certified questions: (1) -whether a trial judge’s denial of a jury request for a copy of instructions is within the notice requirements of rule 3.410; and (2) whether Ivory v. State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla.1977), precludes a harmless error application to a trial court’s denial of a jury request for a copy of instructions during deliberations, without notice to counsel. 1998See id. at 63 . | 1 | 2 |
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahasseegreen1 sentence2025However, Correa waived the notice requirements of rule 1.440(c) by agreeing to the rescheduled trial date and proceeding at trial without objection.”); Brown v. Miami-Dade County, 319 2 So. 3d 81 , 83 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (“Without a transcript, this court cannot provide meaningful appellate review of [the appellant]’s claims alleging error in the trial court’s factual determinations or in the trial court’s exercise of its discretion.”) (citing Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979)). 3 | 1 | 1 |
Aery v. Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, LLCgreen1 sentence2016We agree with the dissent that the problem of game-playing is not resolved by using “magic words.” Even if State Farm had stated in its notice, when it filed the subject affidavit, that the affidavit will be used “for any purpose permitted pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and Florida Evidence Code, including to oppose any motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff,” the notice requirements of rule 1.510(c) would not have been met.2 1 The decisions State Farm relies upon are Aery v. Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, LLC, 118 So. 3d 904, 910 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (quoting Mills v. S | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Reynoldsgreen1 sentence2015See Brown v. Reynolds, 872 So.2d 290, 297 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) (holding that the failure to comply with the notice requirements of rule 1.440 denied the party procedural due process). | 1 | 1 |
Zumpf v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.green1 sentence2013See Zumpf v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 43 So.3d 764, 766-67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (holding that appellant waived any objection under rule 1.440(c) by fully participating in the hearing without objection). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lazar v. Allen
green
2 sentences1997Lazar v. Allen, 347 So.2d 457 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). 1986Lazar v. Allen, 347 So.2d 457 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). | 2 | 1986–1997 |
Meli v. Dade County School Bd.
green
1 sentence1989Bryant v. Duval County Hospital Authority, 502 So.2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Meli v. Dade County School Board, 490 So.2d 120 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986), rev. denied, 500 So.2d 543 (Fla. 1986); State ex rel. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Bryant v. Duval County Hosp. Authority
green
1 sentence1989Bryant v. Duval County Hospital Authority, 502 So.2d 459 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Meli v. Dade County School Board, 490 So.2d 120 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986), rev. denied, 500 So.2d 543 (Fla. 1986); State ex rel. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Williams v. State
green
1 sentence1987E.g., Williams v. State, 488 So.2d 62 (Fla.1986); Ivory v. State, 351 So.2d 26 (Fla.1977). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Williams v. Cochran
green
1 sentence1975In Williams v. Cochran, Fla.1961, 126 So.2d 887 , the Supreme Court held that non-compliance with Fla.Stat. § 932.38 (now Fla.Stat. § 92S.07), which requires that notice be given to the parent of an unmarried minor, invalidated a conviction for the crime of escape. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.