valid legal defense in Florida

2025Lucie Cnty., 557 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 1989). 5 definable class of individuals—and not just the general public—"[u]nder Florida's marketable record title law, the proper recording and indexing of claims involving property is a critical and essential component of a valid legal claim to property." Dixon, 603 So. 2d at 565 .

2025Lucie Cnty., 557 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 1989). 5 definable class of individuals—and not just the general public—"[u]nder Florida's marketable record title law, the proper recording and indexing of claims involving property is a critical and essential component of a valid legal claim to property." Dixon, 603 So. 2d at 565 .

2025The court found that it is the clerk's proper handling of each document that makes the marketable record title law work and acknowledged that "the clerk has candidly conceded that the function is operational and ministerial."2 Id.

2008In sum, our case law provides "if a movant ... alleges a valid legal claim with sufficient factual support, and complies with the oath and contents requirement, then he will ordinarily have stated a facially sufficient postconviction motion." Id. at 550 .

2008In Jacobs , we reiterated that "[t]he rule does not require more." Id. at 553 .

2001See Jackson v. Florida Dep't of Corrections, 790 So.2d 398 (Fla.2001) (court sanctioned defendant by instructing him that it will no longer accept for filing any actions he submits without representation by counsel); Vickson v. Singletary, 734 So.2d 376 (Fla.1999) ("Considering Petitioner Vickson's extremely litigious history, this Court now finds that it must prevent Petitioner from continuing to monopolize this Court's time and energy."); Carnes v. State, 781 So.2d 489 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (after issuing Spencer show-cause order, affirming trial court's order precluding Carnes from filing any

2001See Jackson v. Florida Dep't of Corrections, 790 So.2d 398 (Fla.2001) (court sanctioned defendant by instructing him that it will no longer accept for filing any actions he submits without representation by counsel); Vickson v. Singletary, 734 So.2d 376 (Fla.1999) ("Considering Petitioner Vickson's extremely litigious history, this Court now finds that it must prevent Petitioner from continuing to monopolize this Court's time and energy."); Carnes v. State, 781 So.2d 489 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (after issuing Spencer show-cause order, affirming trial court's order precluding Carnes from filing any

1995See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., 89 So.2d 482 (Fla.1956); Whitehall Realty Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 81 So.2d 475 (Fla. 1955).

1995See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., 89 So.2d 482 (Fla.1956); Whitehall Realty Corp. v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 81 So.2d 475 (Fla. 1955).

1988Because a bona fide debt was owed by the Bulls to SBI, SBI had a valid legal claim against the Bulls, and thus the judgment itself cannot be set aside as a fraud on creditors. [10] The Florida Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, Sections 55.501-.509, Florida Statutes (1985), was upheld as constitutional in the case of GNLV Co. v. Featherstone, 504 So.2d 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).

1986We would note, further, that in refusing to enforce a right to child support, it must be demonstrated that the child will not be required to suffer, see Clayton v. Clayton, 380 So.2d 1143 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), but this additional showing is not required where a trial court refuses to enforce, or modifies or terminates, a party's right to alimony.

1983A defendant is entitled to an instruction regarding a valid legal defense which is asserted if there is any evidence to support it, Bryant v. State, 412 So.2d 347 (Fla. 1982); Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla. 1981), however, in the present case the requested instruction was not in accord with the defense offered to the offense charged and the trial court did not err in declining to give it.

1980Holt v. State, 385 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Baran v. State, 381 So.2d 323 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Freiberger v. State, 343 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

1980Holt v. State, 385 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Baran v. State, 381 So.2d 323 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Freiberger v. State, 343 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

1980Holt v. State, 385 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Baran v. State, 381 So.2d 323 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Freiberger v. State, 343 So.2d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).