76 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Havnergreen2 sentences2010When reviewing a no-evidence point of error, “all the record evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the party in whose favor the verdict has been rendered, and every reasonable inference deducible from the evidence is to be indulged in that party’s favor.” Merrell Dow, 953 S.W.2d at 711 . 2010When reviewing a no-evidence point of error, "all the record evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the party in whose favor the verdict has been rendered, and every reasonable inference deducible from the evidence is to be indulged in that party's favor." Merrell Dow, 953 S.W.2d at 711 . | 11 | 14 |
Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.green2 sentences2010When reviewing a no-evidence point of error, “ all the record evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the party in whose favor the verdict has been rendered, and every reasonable inference deducible from the evidence is to be indulged in that party’s favor. ” Merrell Dow , 953 S.W.2d at 711 . “ Anything more than a scintilla of evidence is legally sufficient to support the finding. ” Formosa Plastics Corp. v. Presidio Eng ’ rs & Contractors, Inc. , 960 S.W.2d 41, 48 (Tex. 1998). 2009When reviewing a no-evidence point of error, “ all the record evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the party in whose favor the verdict has been rendered, and every reasonable inference deducible from the evidence is to be indulged in that party’s favor. ” Merrell Dow , 953 S.W.2d at 711 . “ Anything more than a scintilla of evidence is legally sufficient to support the finding. ” Formosa Plastics Corp. v. Presidio Eng ’ rs & Contractors, Inc. , 960 S.W.2d 41, 48 (Tex. 1998). | 10 | 10 |
Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Martinezgreen2 sentences2007Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Martinez, 977 S.W.2d 328, 334 (Tex.1998). 2. 2005Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Martinez, 977 S.W.2d 328, 334 (Tex. 1998). 2. | 10 | 10 |
City of Keller v. Wilsongreen2 sentences2006In point of error six, Sharon argues that "the trial court erred in awarding appellate attorney's fees which are not supported by the evidence." We construe this as a legal-sufficiency challenge. [6] In City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802, 827 (Tex.2005), the supreme court concluded, "the final test for legal sufficiency must always be whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review . . . [L]egal-sufficiency review in the proper light must credit favorable evidence if reasonable jurors could, and disregard contrary evidence un 2006In point of error six, Sharon argues that "the trial court erred in awarding appellate attorney's fees which are not supported by the evidence." We construe this as a legal-sufficiency challenge. [6] In City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802, 827 (Tex.2005), the supreme court concluded, "the final test for legal sufficiency must always be whether the evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-minded people to reach the verdict under review . . . [L]egal-sufficiency review in the proper light must credit favorable evidence if reasonable jurors could, and disregard contrary evidence un | 9 | 18 |
Marathon Corp. v. Pitznergreen2 sentences2021Plano Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Roberts, 167 S.W.3d 616, 621 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.) (citing Marathon Corp. v. Pitzner, 106 S.W.3d 724, 727 (Tex. 2003); Mary Kay Inc. v. Woolf, 146 S.W.3d 813, 817 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2004, no pet.)). 2008Marathon Corp. v. Pitzner , 106 S.W.3d 724 , 727 (Tex. 2003); see Wilson , 168 S.W.3d at 809 . | 9 | 10 |
Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Cryegreen2 sentences1999Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Crye, 907 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Tex.1995); Best v. Ryan Auto Group, Inc., 786 S.W.2d 670, 671 (Tex.1990). 1997Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Crye , 907 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Tex. 1995); Best v. Ryan Auto Group, Inc ., 786 S.W.2d 670, 671 (Tex. 1990). | 6 | 6 |
Best v. Ryan Auto Group, Inc.green2 sentences1999Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Crye, 907 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Tex.1995); Best v. Ryan Auto Group, Inc., 786 S.W.2d 670, 671 (Tex.1990). 1997Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Crye , 907 S.W.2d 497, 499 (Tex. 1995); Best v. Ryan Auto Group, Inc ., 786 S.W.2d 670, 671 (Tex. 1990). | 6 | 6 |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Millergreen2 sentences2024See Wal–Mart Stores, Inc. v. Miller, 102 S.W.3d 706, 709 (Tex. 2003); Barry v. Barry, 193 S.W.3d 72, 75 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006 no pet.) (applying standard to a restricted appeal from a default divorce decree). 2007See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Miller, 102 S.W.3d 706, 709 (Tex.2003); Barry v. Barry, 193 S.W.3d 72, 75 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006 no pet.) (applying standard to a restricted appeal from a default divorce decree). | 4 | 4 |
Mary Kay Inc. v. Woolfgreen2 sentences2021Plano Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Roberts, 167 S.W.3d 616, 621 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.) (citing Marathon Corp. v. Pitzner, 106 S.W.3d 724, 727 (Tex. 2003); Mary Kay Inc. v. Woolf, 146 S.W.3d 813, 817 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2004, no pet.)). 2006Marathon Corp. v. Pitzner, 106 S.W.3d 724, 727 (Tex.2003); Mary Kay, Inc. v. Woolf, 146 S.W.3d 813, 817 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, pet. denied), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1061 , 125 S.Ct. 2530 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1112 (2005); see Wilson, 168 S.W.3d at 809 . | 3 | 3 |
Cecil v. Smithgreen2 sentences2015See Cecil v. Smith, 804 S.W.2d 509, 510-11 (Tex. 1991). 2005See Cecil v. Smith, 804 S.W.2d 509 , 510—11 (Tex.1991). | 2 | 3 |
Gregory v. Sunbelt Savings, F.S.B.green2 sentences1999See Gregory, 835 S.W.2d at 158 . 1996Gregory v. Sunbelt Sav., F.S.B., 835 S.W.2d 155, 158 (Tex. App. — Dallas 1992, writ denied). | 2 | 3 |
Garza v. Alviargreen2 sentences1993Alm v. Aluminum Co. of Am. , 717 S.W.2d 588, 593 (Tex. 1986), cert. denied , 498 U.S. 847 (1990); Garza v. Alviar , 395 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex. 1965). 1991Garza v. Alviar, 395 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex.1965). | 2 | 3 |
Schaefer v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'ngreen2 sentences1984Shaefer v. Texas Employers Insurance Association, 612 S.W.2d 199, 201 (Tex.1981). 1983Schaefer v. Texas Employers Insurance Assoc., 612 S.W.2d 199, 201 (Tex.1981). | 2 | 3 |
Barry v. Barrygreen2 sentences2024See Wal–Mart Stores, Inc. v. Miller, 102 S.W.3d 706, 709 (Tex. 2003); Barry v. Barry, 193 S.W.3d 72, 75 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006 no pet.) (applying standard to a restricted appeal from a default divorce decree). 2007See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Miller, 102 S.W.3d 706, 709 (Tex.2003); Barry v. Barry, 193 S.W.3d 72, 75 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006 no pet.) (applying standard to a restricted appeal from a default divorce decree). | 2 | 2 |
Arias v. Brookstone, L.P.green2 sentences2010In reviewing a challenge to the factual sufficiency of the evidence, we “must consider and weigh all the evidence and should set aside the judgment only if it is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust.” Arias v. Brookstone, L.P. , 265 S.W.3d 459, 468 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (citing Cain v. Bain , 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986)). 2009In reviewing a challenge to the factual sufficiency of the evidence, we “must consider and weigh all the evidence and should set aside the judgment only if it is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust.” Arias v. Brookstone, L.P. , 265 S.W.3d 459, 468 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (citing Cain v. Bain , 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986)). | 2 | 2 |
Cain v. Baingreen2 sentences2010In reviewing a challenge to the factual sufficiency of the evidence, we “must consider and weigh all the evidence and should set aside the judgment only if it is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust.” Arias v. Brookstone, L.P. , 265 S.W.3d 459, 468 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (citing Cain v. Bain , 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986)). 2009In reviewing a challenge to the factual sufficiency of the evidence, we “must consider and weigh all the evidence and should set aside the judgment only if it is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust.” Arias v. Brookstone, L.P. , 265 S.W.3d 459, 468 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, pet. denied) (citing Cain v. Bain , 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986)). | 2 | 2 |
Stedman v. GEORGETOWN S. & L. ASS'Ngreen2 sentences1999Stedman v. Georgetown Sav. & Loan Ass'n , 595 S.W.2d 486, 488 (Tex. 1979). 1998Stedman v. Georgetown Sav. & Loan Ass'n , 595 S.W.2d 486, 488 (Tex. 1979). | 2 | 2 |
Alm v. Aluminum Co. of Americagreen2 sentences1993Alm v. Aluminum Co. of Am. , 717 S.W.2d 588, 593 (Tex. 1986), cert. denied , 498 U.S. 847 (1990); Garza v. Alviar , 395 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex. 1965). 1992Alm v. Aluminum Co. of Am. , 717 S.W.2d 588, 593 (Tex. 1986). | 2 | 2 |
Int'l Bus. Machs. Corp. v. Lufkin Indus., LLCgreen1 sentence2024See, e.g., Lufkin, 573 S.W.3d at 235 ; McKnight, 689 S.W.2d at 207–08. | 1 | 1 |
Plano Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Robertsgreen1 sentence2021Plano Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Roberts, 167 S.W.3d 616, 621 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.) (citing Marathon Corp. v. Pitzner, 106 S.W.3d 724, 727 (Tex. 2003); Mary Kay Inc. v. Woolf, 146 S.W.3d 813, 817 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2004, no pet.)). | 1 | 1 |
Dyson v. Olin Corp.green1 sentence2016See id. | 1 | 1 |
Kroger Texas Ltd. Partnership v. Suberugreen1 sentence2007See Kroger Tex. Ltd. v. Suberu, 216 S.W.3d 788, 793 (Tex.2006); City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802, 807 (Tex.2005); Pulley, 198 S.W.3d at 426 . | 1 | 1 |
Ellis County State Bank v. Keevergreen2 sentences1997Ellis County State Bank v. Keener, 888 S.W.2d 790, 794 (Tex.1994). 1997Ellis County State Bank v. Keever, 888 S.W.2d 790, 794 (Tex.1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.green | 1 | 1 |
Holley v. Wattsgreen1 sentence1992See Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co. , 767 S.W.2d 686, 690 (Tex. 1989) (treating a no-evidence point of error as a conclusive-evidence point of error in a failure-to-find case); see also Holley v. Watts , 629 S.W.2d 694, 696 (Tex. 1982) (appellate courts should look not only to the wording of the point of error, but also at the argument under the point of error to determine the complaining party's intent). 2. 2 See Tex. Rev. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McKnight v. Hill & Hill Exterminators, Inc.
green
2 sentences2024See, e.g., Lufkin, 573 S.W.3d at 235 ; McKnight, 689 S.W.2d at 207–08. 1988McKnight v. Hill & Hill Exterminators, Inc., 689 S.W.2d 206 (Tex.1985). | 3 | 1987–2024 |
Porter v. Ascension Parish School Board
neutral
2 sentences2006Marathon Corp. v. Pitzner, 106 S.W.3d 724, 727 (Tex.2003); Mary Kay, Inc. v. Woolf, 146 S.W.3d 813, 817 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, pet. denied), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1061 , 125 S.Ct. 2530 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1112 (2005); see Wilson, 168 S.W.3d at 809 . 2006Marathon Corp. v. Pitzner, 106 S.W.3d 724, 727 (Tex.2003); Mary Kay, Inc. v. Woolf, 146 S.W.3d 813, 817 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, pet. denied), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1061 , 125 S.Ct. 2530 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1112 (2005); see Wilson, 168 S.W.3d at 809 . | 2 | 2005–2006 |
Pontiac v. Elliott
green
2 sentences2004Id. 2004Id. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Pulley v. Milberger
green
2 sentences2007See Kroger Tex. Ltd. v. Suberu, 216 S.W.3d 788, 793 (Tex.2006); City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802, 807 (Tex.2005); Pulley, 198 S.W.3d at 426 . 2007Marathon Corp. v. Pitzner, 106 S.W.3d 724, 727 (Tex.2003); Pulley, 198 S.W.3d at 426 ; see Wilson, 168 S.W.3d at 809 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.
green
1 sentence2006Marathon Corp. v. Pitzner, 106 S.W.3d 724, 727 (Tex.2003); Mary Kay, Inc. v. Woolf, 146 S.W.3d 813, 817 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, pet. denied), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1061 , 125 S.Ct. 2530 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1112 (2005); see Wilson, 168 S.W.3d at 809 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Williams v. Mosbacher
green
1 sentence1993Alm v. Aluminum Co. of Am. , 717 S.W.2d 588, 593 (Tex. 1986), cert. denied , 498 U.S. 847 (1990); Garza v. Alviar , 395 S.W.2d 821, 823 (Tex. 1965). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.