10 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Edward Clark Jr.green2 sentences2017United States v. Clark, 24 F.3d 299, 303 (D.C. 2017United States v. Clark, 24 F.3d 299, 303 (D.C. | 3 | 3 |
State v. Clinegreen2 sentences2019See id. 2019See id. | 2 | 2 |
Virginia v. Mooregreen1 sentence2025We do not inquire into the officers’ reasons for conducting the search of the arrestee’s person because “[t]he interests justifying search are present whenever an officer makes an arrest.” Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164, 177 (2008); see also Robinson, 414 U.S. at 234–35 (explaining that the close contact with suspects when making an arrest and transporting them to the jail, as opposed to the “fleeting contact” involved with “Terry-type stop[s,] . . . is an adequate basis for treating all custodial arrests alike for purposes of search justification”); Byrd, 310 P.3d at 796 (“[S]earches of the | 1 | 1 |
State v. Byrdgreen1 sentence2025We do not inquire into the officers’ reasons for conducting the search of the arrestee’s person because “[t]he interests justifying search are present whenever an officer makes an arrest.” Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164, 177 (2008); see also Robinson, 414 U.S. at 234–35 (explaining that the close contact with suspects when making an arrest and transporting them to the jail, as opposed to the “fleeting contact” involved with “Terry-type stop[s,] . . . is an adequate basis for treating all custodial arrests alike for purposes of search justification”); Byrd, 310 P.3d at 796 (“[S]earches of the | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Robinsongreen2 sentences2025We do not inquire into the officers’ reasons for conducting the search of the arrestee’s person because “[t]he interests justifying search are present whenever an officer makes an arrest.” Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164, 177 (2008); see also Robinson, 414 U.S. at 234–35 (explaining that the close contact with suspects when making an arrest and transporting them to the jail, as opposed to the “fleeting contact” involved with “Terry-type stop[s,] . . . is an adequate basis for treating all custodial arrests alike for purposes of search justification”); Byrd, 310 P.3d at 796 (“[S]earches of the 2025We do not inquire into the officers’ reasons for conducting the search of the arrestee’s person because “[t]he interests justifying search are present whenever an officer makes an arrest.” Virginia v. Moore, 553 U.S. 164, 177 (2008); see also Robinson, 414 U.S. at 234–35 (explaining that the close contact with suspects when making an arrest and transporting them to the jail, as opposed to the “fleeting contact” involved with “Terry-type stop[s,] . . . is an adequate basis for treating all custodial arrests alike for purposes of search justification”); Byrd, 310 P.3d at 796 (“[S]earches of the | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Randall Lee Palsgreen1 sentence2017As a result, the federal courts and many state courts have sought to 10 apply Terry principles in evaluating searches and seizures arising from traffic stops.” State v. Pals, 805 N.W.2d 767, 775 (Iowa 2011). | 1 | 1 |
Berkemer v. McCartygreen2 sentences2011In Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 439 , 104 S.Ct. 3138, 3150 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317, 334 (1984), the Supreme Court concluded that a traffic stop was more analogous to a Terry-type stop than a formal arrest. 2011In Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 439 , 104 S.Ct. 3138, 3150 , 82 L.Ed.2d 317, 334 (1984), the Supreme Court concluded that a traffic stop was more analogous to a Terry-type stop than a formal arrest. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Hendersongreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740, 752 (6th Cir.2008) (stating Terry-type stop must be reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place); United States v. Henderson, 463 F.3d 27, 45 (1st Cir.2006) (holding the scope and duration must be reasonably related to the purpose of the vehicle stop). 2011See, e.g., United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740, 752 (6th Cir. 2008) (stating Terry-type stop must be reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place); United States v. Henderson, 463 F.3d 27, 45 (lst Cir. 2006) (holding the scope and duration must be reasonably related to the purpose of the vehicle stop). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Blairgreen2 sentences2011See, e.g., United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740, 752 (6th Cir.2008) (stating Terry-type stop must be reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place); United States v. Henderson, 463 F.3d 27, 45 (1st Cir.2006) (holding the scope and duration must be reasonably related to the purpose of the vehicle stop). 2011See, e.g., United States v. Blair, 524 F.3d 740, 752 (6th Cir. 2008) (stating Terry-type stop must be reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place); United States v. Henderson, 463 F.3d 27, 45 (lst Cir. 2006) (holding the scope and duration must be reasonably related to the purpose of the vehicle stop). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences2022According to the Jones court, to contend that evidence that was obtained pursuant to an unlawful Terry-type stop is admissible because of events that occurred because of the illegal conduct is “a bootstrap analysis.” Id. at 873 . 2022According to the Jones court, to contend that evidence that was obtained pursuant to an unlawful Terry-type stop is admissible because of events that occurred because of the illegal conduct is “a bootstrap analysis.” Id. at 873 . | 2 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Beauchesne
green
2 sentences2022Similarly, in State v. Beauchesne, the New Hampshire Supreme Court rejected application of the new crime exception where an officer unlawfully grabbed a defendant who then threw something away. 868 A.2d 972, 975 , 983–84 (N.H. 2005). 2022Similarly, in State v. Beauchesne, the New Hampshire Supreme Court rejected application of the new crime exception where an officer unlawfully grabbed a defendant who then threw something away. 868 A.2d 972, 975 , 983–84 (N.H. 2005). | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.