Secretary motion in Illinois

10 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
Murdy v. Edgargreen ill · 1984 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003Upon review, an administrative agency’s factual findings and conclusions are considered prima facie true and correct. 735 ILCS 5/3 — 110 (West 2000); Murdy v. Edgar, 103 Ill. 2d 384, 391 (1984); Britt v. Edgar, 192 Ill. 2003Upon review, an administrative agency's factual findings and conclusions are considered prima facie true and correct. 735 ILCS 5/3-110 (West 2000); Murdy v. Edgar , 103 Ill. 2d 384, 391 (1984); Britt v. Edgar , 192 Ill.	2	2
Britt v. Edgargreen illappct · 1989 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003Upon review, an administrative agency’s factual findings and conclusions are considered prima facie true and correct. 735 ILCS 5/3 — 110 (West 2000); Murdy v. Edgar, 103 Ill. 2d 384, 391 (1984); Britt v. Edgar, 192 Ill. 2003Upon review, an administrative agency's factual findings and conclusions are considered prima facie true and correct. 735 ILCS 5/3-110 (West 2000); Murdy v. Edgar , 103 Ill. 2d 384, 391 (1984); Britt v. Edgar , 192 Ill.	2	2

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

Case	Cited	Years
In re Commitment of Rendon green illappct · 2017 2 sentences 2018At the time of an examination under subsection (a) of Section 55 of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the committed person with a written notice of the person’s right to petition the court for discharge over the Secretary’s objection. * If the person does not affirmatively waive -8- the right to petition, the court shall set a probable cause hearing to determine whether facts exist to believe that since the most recent periodic reexamination , the condition of the committed person has so changed that he or she is no longer a[n] [SVP]. The probable cause hearing under this Section 2018*At the time of an examination under subsection (a) of Section 55 of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the committed person with a written notice of the person's right to petition the court for discharge over the Secretary's objection. * * If the person does not affirmatively waive the right to petition, the court shall set a probable cause hearing to determine whether facts exist to believe that since the most recent periodic reexamination * * , the condition of the committed person has so changed that he or she is no longer a[n] [SVP]. * * The probable cause hearing under this Sectio	2	2018–2018
In Re Marriage of Gulla green illappct · 2008 2 sentences 2013We believe that if the obligee of a support order wants to take advantage of the significant penalties that may be recovered against an employer under the Act, the obligee must comply fully with the statutory notice requirements so that the notice is “regular on its face.” ¶ 25 Citing In re Marriage of Gulla, 382 Ill. 2013Gulla, 382 Ill.	2	2013–2013
People v. Orth green ill · 1988 2 sentences 2006We see no appreciable difference between a motorist's credible testimony that he was not under the influence of alcohol, which challenged the reliability of the positive Breathalyzer test upon which his driver's license suspension was based (see Orth, 124 Ill. 2d at 341 ) and Wigginton's credible testimony that she did not use marijuana, which challenged the reliability of the positive drug test result upon which her school bus driver's permit suspension was based. 2006We see no appreciable difference between a motorist’s credible testimony that he was not under the influence of alcohol, which challenged the reliability of the positive Breathalyzer test upon which his driver’s license suspension was based (see Orth, 124 Ill. 2d at 341 ) and Wigginton’s credible testimony that she did not use marijuana, which challenged the reliability of the positive drug test result upon which her school bus driver’s permit suspension was based.	2	2006–2006
People v. Pine green ill · 1989 2 sentences 1989The supreme court has resolved the standing question in the Secretary’s favor in its recently issued decision in People v. Pine (1989), 129 Ill. 2d 88 . 1989The Illinois Supreme Court in People v. Pine (1989), 129 Ill. 2d 88 , recently held that the Secretary has standing to challenge such orders.	2	1989–1989
In re Detention of Stanbridge green ill · 2012 1 sentence 2018At the time of an examination under subsection (a) of Section 55 of this Act, the Secretary shall provide the committed person with a written notice of the person’s right to petition the court for discharge over the Secretary’s objection. * If the person does not affirmatively waive -8- the right to petition, the court shall set a probable cause hearing to determine whether facts exist to believe that since the most recent periodic reexamination , the condition of the committed person has so changed that he or she is no longer a[n] [SVP]. ** The probable cause hearing under this Section	1	2018–2018

Where else courts name it

PA 15 (1970–2021) IL 10 (1989–2018) TX 8 (2009–2025) NM 8 (1993–2018) MA 6 (1983–2010) CA 6 (1930–2020) MS 5 (2004–2024) NE 4 (2024–2026) AZ 4 (1933–2015) CO 4 (2006–2017) OR 3 (1982–2010) GA 3 (1935–2023) NV 3 (1931–2017) VT 2 (1994–1997) MI 2 (1975–2022) WA 2 (2000–2014) SC 2 (1946–1980)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check