10 Kansas opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re JLDgreen2 sentences2020App. 2d at 83 , quoting In re J.L.D., 14 Kan. 2009Although the J.L.D. court stated its intention to narrow the holding in In re S.M., the court erroneously interpreted the S.M. court to have broadly conferred upon each natural parent an unconditional and “absolute right to be present at a severance hearing without regard to the particular circumstances in the individual case.” In re J.L.D., 14 Kan. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In the Interest of Cooper
green
2 sentences1991Without an attorney to represent the parents, the evidence would be taken in violation of the due process rights of the parent.” 230 Kan. at 67 . 1991Without an attorney to represent the parents, the evidence would be taken in violation of the due process rights of the parent.' 230 Kan. at 67 ." 15 Kan. | 4 | 1991–1991 |
Wilson & Walker v. State
green
2 sentences2005App. 2d 955, 958 , 939 P.2d 937 (1997) (Personal jurisdiction over the defendant can be obtained only through compliance with the statutory procedure regarding issuance and service of process, or through voluntary appearance.); Wilson & Walker v. State, 230 Kan. 49 , 630 P.2d 1102 (1988) (In a child termination case, oral notice of the severance hearing was inadequate to comply with one of the statutorily provided ways of effecting service of process.). 2005App. 2d 955, 958 , 939 P.2d 937 (1997) (Personal jurisdiction over the defendant can be obtained only through compliance with the statutory procedure regarding issuance and service of process, or through voluntary appearance.); Wilson & Walker v. State, 230 Kan. 49 , 630 P.2d 1102 (1988) (In a child termination case, oral notice of the severance hearing was inadequate to comply with one of the statutorily provided ways of effecting service of process.). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
In Re HC
green
2 sentences2005App. 2d 955, 958 , 939 P.2d 937 (1997) (Personal jurisdiction over the defendant can be obtained only through compliance with the statutory procedure regarding issuance and service of process, or through voluntary appearance.); Wilson & Walker v. State, 230 Kan. 49 , 630 P.2d 1102 (1988) (In a child termination case, oral notice of the severance hearing was inadequate to comply with one of the statutorily provided ways of effecting service of process.). 2005App. 2d 955, 958 , 939 P.2d 937 (1997) (Personal jurisdiction over the defendant can be obtained only through compliance with the statutory procedure regarding issuance and service of process, or through voluntary appearance.); Wilson & Walker v. State, 230 Kan. 49 , 630 P.2d 1102 (1988) (In a child termination case, oral notice of the severance hearing was inadequate to comply with one of the statutorily provided ways of effecting service of process.). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
In Re Mary P.
green
2 sentences1993In support of his position, K.P. cites In re Mary P., 237 Kan. 456 , 701 P.2d 681 (1985), in which the court held that the exception as it existed then did not apply to proceedings under the juvenile offenders code. 1993In support of his position, K.P. cites In re Mary P., 237 Kan. 456 , 701 P.2d 681 (1985), in which the court held that the exception as it existed then did not apply to proceedings under the juvenile offenders code. | 2 | 1993–1993 |
In Re SRH
neutral
2 sentences1991Without an attorney to represent the parents, the evidence would be taken in violation of the due process rights of the parent.’ 230 Kan. at 67 .” 15 Kan. 1991Without an attorney to represent the parents, the evidence would be taken in violation of the due process rights of the parent.' 230 Kan. at 67 ." 15 Kan. | 2 | 1991–1991 |
In Re the Adoption of B.J.M.
green
1 sentence2020Instead, B.J.M. refutes the proposition that courts have broadly conferred upon each natural parent an unconditional and "'absolute right to be present at a severance hearing without regard to the particular circumstances in the individual case.'" 42 Kan. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.