irreparable harm requirement (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

irreparable harm requirement in Louisiana

10 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1997–2022 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Yokum v. Pat O'Brien's Bar, Inc.green
lactapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See Yokum, 12-0217, pp. 8-9, 99 So.3d at 81 . 4 This exception, however, is inapplicable to the Improvement Association’s request for a preliminary injunction.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Jurisich v. Jenkins green
la · 1999
2 sentences

2022GRANT OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BY THE TRIAL COURT We are also called upon to decide whether the trial court was correct in granting injunctive relief against the ATC and in favor of Shenanigans, prohibiting the ATC from prospectively enforcing COVID restrictions against Shenanigans. 21-CA-304 18 The Supreme Court, in Jurisich v. Jenkins, 99-0076 (La.10/19/99), 749 So.2d 597, 599 , set forth the exception to the irreparable harm requirement for the grant of injunctive relief as follows: A petitioner is entitled to injunctive relief without the requisite showing of irreparable injury when the conduc

2022As explained by the Fourth Circuit: Specifically, in Jurisich v. Jenkins, 99-0076 (La. 10/19/99), 749 So.2d 597 , the Supreme Court established an exception to the irreparable harm requirement for instances when the plaintiff asks for a prohibitory injunction that seeks only to order compliance with a prohibitory law.

82012–2022
Hobbs v. Gorman green
lactapp · 1992
1 sentence

2022In Hobbs, 595 So.2d at 1266-67 , this Court determined that the irreparable harm exception did not apply to an employee who sought to prevent the Sewerage & Water Board (hereinafter “S&WB”) from prohibiting the employee from using a S&WB vehicle to commute.

12022–2022
Jackson v. Pfeifer green
lactapp · 2014
1 sentence

2016C.C.P. art. 3663; Jackson v. Pfeifer, 14-0062, p. 6 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/12/14), 152 So.3d 998, 1002 .

12016–2016
Concerned Citizens v. Parish of Tangipahoa green
lactapp · 2005
1 sentence

2012A mandatory injunction “commands the doing of some action” and “cannot be issued without a hearing on the merits.” Concerned Citizens for Proper Planning, LLC v. Parish of Tangipahoa, 04-0270, p. 7 (La.App. 1 Cir. 3/24/05), 906 So.2d 660, 664 .

12012–2012
Gulf Coast Bank v. Gulf Coast Bank & Trust Co. green
la · 1995
1 sentence

1997Recently the Louisiana Supreme Court fully examined the law of trade marks and trade names in Gulf Coast Bank v. Gulf Coast Bank & Trust Co., 94-2203 (La.4/10/95), 652 So.2d 1306 .

11997–1997

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 26:286 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 26:80 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 26:90 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

FL 18 (1996–2026) LA 10 (1997–2022) KY 5 (2018–2026) IL 4 (1983–2022) PA 4 (1982–2025) NY 4 (2005–2020) UT 3 (2001–2019) TX 3 (1998–2025) RI 3 (1981–1991) SC 3 (2005–2005) VT 3 (1987–2025) OK 2 (2009–2023) IN 2 (1994–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check