pecuniary standard in Louisiana

1975City of Lake Charles v. Lake Charles Ry., Light & Waterworks Co., 144 La. 217 , 80 So. 260 ; Louisiana State Board of Medical Exam. v. Tackett, La.App., 70 So.2d 207 .” There is no allegation in plaintiff’s petition that plaintiff could not be compensated adequately in damages or that damages could not be measured by a pecuniary standard.

1974Tackett, La.App., 70 So.2d 207 ." We find, as a matter of law, based on the action of the Department in designating the defendants the collective bargaining agent of approximately two-thirds of its affected employees who are non-union members, that plaintiffs have no adequate remedy at law to recover damages incurred by the action of the Department and the appellants herein, and further that such damage cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard.

2006Star Enter. v. State Through Dept. of Revenue and Taxation, 95-1980, 95-1981, 95-1982, p. 13 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/28/96), 676 So.2d 827, 834 , writ denied, 96-1983 (La.3/14/97), 689 So.2d 1383 .

1997And a few close friends would have no place to live. * * * * * * "Irreparable harm" generally means "loss that cannot be adequately compensated in money damages or measured by a pecuniary standard." Star Enterprise v. State Through Dep't Of Revenue and Taxation, 95-1980, 95-1981, 95-1982 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/28/96) , 676 So.2d 827, 834 , writ denied, 96-1983 (La.3/1497), 689 So.2d 1383 .

2006Star Enter. v. State Through Dept. of Revenue and Taxation, 95-1980, 95-1981, 95-1982, p. 13 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/28/96), 676 So.2d 827, 834 , writ denied, 96-1983 (La.3/14/97), 689 So.2d 1383 .

1997And a few close friends would have no place to live. * * * * * * "Irreparable harm" generally means "loss that cannot be adequately compensated in money damages or measured by a pecuniary standard." Star Enterprise v. State Through Dep't Of Revenue and Taxation, 95-1980, 95-1981, 95-1982 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/28/96) , 676 So.2d 827, 834 , writ denied, 96-1983 (La.3/1497), 689 So.2d 1383 .

2022Id.

2006“Irreparable injury is injury or loss for which damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard or which cannot be adequately compensated in money damages.” Bra nnan v. Talbot, 29,692, p. 10 (La.App. 2 Cir. 4/2/97), 691 So.2d 848, 854 , writ denied, 97-1419 (La.9/19/97), 701 So.2d 172 (citations omitted).

2016Giauque v. Clean Harbors Plaquemine, L.L.C., 2005-0799, p. 6 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/9/06), 938 So.2d 135, 140 , writs denied, 2006-1720, 2006-1818 (La. 1/12/07), 948 So.2d 150 , 151.

2008Giauque v. Clean Harbors Plaquemine, L.L.C., 05-0799 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/9/06) , 938 So.2d 135, 140 , writs denied, 06-1720, 06-1818 (La.1/12/07), 948 So.2d 150 , 151.

2016Giauque v. Clean Harbors Plaquemine, L.L.C., 2005-0799, p. 6 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/9/06), 938 So.2d 135, 140 , writs denied, 2006-1720, 2006-1818 (La. 1/12/07), 948 So.2d 150 , 151.

2008Giauque v. Clean Harbors Plaquemine, L.L.C., 05-0799 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/9/06) , 938 So.2d 135, 140 , writs denied, 06-1720, 06-1818 (La.1/12/07), 948 So.2d 150 , 151.

1970In that case the court applied the definition of irreparable injury adopted by the Supreme Court in City of Lake Charles v. Lake Charles Ry., Light & Waterworks Co., 144 La. 217 , 80 So. 260 (1918), namely: "An irreparable injury is one for which the party injured cannot be compensated adequately in damages, or for which the damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard." In Pennington v. Drews, 209 La. 1 , 24 So.2d 156 (1945), the Supreme Court made a distinction between a stipulated "penalty" and stipulated "damages" and held that an injunction would lie where the stipulation was one of

1970In that case the court applied the definition of irreparable injury adopted by the Supreme Court in City of Lake Charles v. Lake Charles Ry., Light & Waterworks Co., 144 La. 217 , 80 So. 260 (1918), namely: "An irreparable injury is one for which the party injured cannot be compensated adequately in damages, or for which the damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard." In Pennington v. Drews, 209 La. 1 , 24 So.2d 156 (1945), the Supreme Court made a distinction between a stipulated "penalty" and stipulated "damages" and held that an injunction would lie where the stipulation was one of

1986Melancon v. Assumption Parish Police Jury, 231 So.2d 690 (La.App. 1st Cir.1970); South Cent.

1971Ridge Park v. Police Jury of Jefferson Parish, 210 La. 351 , 27 So.2d 128 (1946); Cloud v. Dyess, 172 So.2d 528 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1965). “ ‘An irreparable injury is one for which the party injured cannot be compensated adequately in damages, or for which the damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard.’ City of Lake Charles v. Lake Charles Ry., Light & Waterworks Co., 144 La. 217 , 80 So. 260 (1918).” (Melancon v. Assumption Parish Police Jury, 231 So.2d 690,691 ) We further stated in Melancon that the trial judge has broad discretion in determining whether to grant or refuse a preliminar

1974Assn. v. Mathews, La.App., 158 So. 247 , for the pronouncement that: "* * * The writ of injunction, being a harsh, drastic, and extraordinary remedy, should issue only where the party seeking same is threatened with irreparable loss or injury without adequate remedy at law." In Amacker v. Amacker, La.App., 146 So.2d 672 , this court defined irreparable injury, loss or damage as follows: "(2) Irreparable injury, loss or damage is that injury, loss or damage for which the injured party cannot be compensated adequately in damages or for which his damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard

1970In this regard we cite the following enunciation appearing in Rapides Dairy Dealers' Co-op Ass'n v. Mathews, 1935, La.App., 158 So. 247 . `* * * The writ of injunction, being a harsh, drastic, and extraordinary remedy, should issue only where the party seeking same is threatened with irreparable loss or injury without adequate remedy at law.'" [ 146 So.2d 672, 675 ] Our courts have defined irreparable injury, loss or damage, as that injury, loss or damage for which his damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard.

1974LSA-C.C.P. art. 3601.” [ 235 So.2d 222, 226 ] A definition of “irreparable injury” was stated in Monochem, Inc. v. East Ascension Telephone Company, 195 So.2d 748 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1967): “ * * * Irreparable injury is that injury ‘for which the injured party cannot be compensated adequately in damages or for which his damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard.’ ” [ 195 So.2d 748, 751 ] Franklin v. Clemmons, 252 So.2d 687 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1971); Piper v. Olinde’s Hardware & Supply Co., 259 So.2d 655 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1972) and State Board of Education v. National Collegiate Athleti

1974LSA-C.C.P. art. 3601.” [ 235 So.2d 222, 226 ] A definition of “irreparable injury” was stated in Monochem, Inc. v. East Ascension Telephone Company, 195 So.2d 748 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1967): “ * * * Irreparable injury is that injury ‘for which the injured party cannot be compensated adequately in damages or for which his damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard.’ ” [ 195 So.2d 748, 751 ] Franklin v. Clemmons, 252 So.2d 687 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1971); Piper v. Olinde’s Hardware & Supply Co., 259 So.2d 655 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1972) and State Board of Education v. National Collegiate Athleti

2025Shaw v. Hingle, 94-1579 (La. 1/17/95), 648 So. 2d 903 ; Terral v. AG Res.

2025Shaw v. Hingle, 94-1579 (La. 1/17/95), 648 So. 2d 903 ; Terral v. AG Res.

2006“Irreparable injury is injury or loss for which damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard or which cannot be adequately compensated in money damages.” Bra nnan v. Talbot, 29,692, p. 10 (La.App. 2 Cir. 4/2/97), 691 So.2d 848, 854 , writ denied, 97-1419 (La.9/19/97), 701 So.2d 172 (citations omitted).

2000Brannan v. Talbot, 29,692 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), 691 So.2d 848 , review denied, 97-1419 (La.9/19/97), 701 So.2d 172 .

1997Prakasam v. Popowski, supra ; Amacker v. Amacker, 146 So.2d 672 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1962); Johnson v. Lee, 352 So.2d 303 (La.

1990Johnson v. Lee, 352 So.2d 303 (La.App. 4th Cir.1977); National Pacific Corp. v. American Commonwealth Financial Corp., 348 So.2d 735 (La.App. 1st Cir.1977).

1990Johnson v. Lee, 352 So.2d 303 (La.App. 4th Cir.1977); National Pacific Corp. v. American Commonwealth Financial Corp., 348 So.2d 735 (La.App. 1st Cir.1977).

1983National Pacific Corporation v. American Commonwealth Financial Corporation, 348 So.2d 735 (La.App. 1st Cir.1977).

1986Terrebonne Parish Police Jury v. Matherne, 405 So.2d 314 (La.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 972 , 102 S.Ct. 2234 , 72 L.Ed.2d 845 (1982); Daigre Engineers, Inc. v. City of Winnfield, 385 So.2d 866 (La.App. 2d Cir.1980).

1983Daigre Engineers, Inc. v. City of Winnfield, 385 So.2d 866 (La.App. 2d Cir.1980).

1982Wood v. Gibson Construction Company, Inc., 313 So.2d 898 (La.App.2d Cir.1975), writ refused, 320 So.2d 549 .

1977Wood v. Gibson Construction Company, 313 So.2d 898 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1975), writ refused 320 So.2d 549 (La.1975).

1982Wood v. Gibson Construction Company, Inc., 313 So.2d 898 (La.App.2d Cir.1975), writ refused, 320 So.2d 549 .

1977Wood v. Gibson Construction Company, 313 So.2d 898 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1975), writ refused 320 So.2d 549 (La.1975).

1980Caffery v. Powell, 320 So.2d 223 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975); State Board of Education v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 273 So.2d 912 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1973); and Waters v. Karst, 235 So.2d 222 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1970).

1974LSA-C.C.P. art. 3601.” [ 235 So.2d 222, 226 ] A definition of “irreparable injury” was stated in Monochem, Inc. v. East Ascension Telephone Company, 195 So.2d 748 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1967): “ * * * Irreparable injury is that injury ‘for which the injured party cannot be compensated adequately in damages or for which his damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard.’ ” [ 195 So.2d 748, 751 ] Franklin v. Clemmons, 252 So.2d 687 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1971); Piper v. Olinde’s Hardware & Supply Co., 259 So.2d 655 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1972) and State Board of Education v. National Collegiate Athleti

1980Caffery v. Powell, 320 So.2d 223 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1975); State Board of Education v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 273 So.2d 912 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1973); and Waters v. Karst, 235 So.2d 222 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1970).

1974LSA-C.C.P. art. 3601.” [ 235 So.2d 222, 226 ] A definition of “irreparable injury” was stated in Monochem, Inc. v. East Ascension Telephone Company, 195 So.2d 748 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1967): “ * * * Irreparable injury is that injury ‘for which the injured party cannot be compensated adequately in damages or for which his damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard.’ ” [ 195 So.2d 748, 751 ] Franklin v. Clemmons, 252 So.2d 687 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1971); Piper v. Olinde’s Hardware & Supply Co., 259 So.2d 655 (La.App., 1st Cir. 1972) and State Board of Education v. National Collegiate Athleti

1975Danzie v. Rutland, 232 So.2d 303 (La.App., 2d Cir. 1970); McBride v. Duckworth, 232 So.2d 122 (La.App., 2d Cir. 1970). *900 The Civil Code, in Chapter 2, Of Servitudes Which Originate From the Natural Situation of the Places, provides: "Art. 660.

1973Danzie v. Rutland, 232 So.2d 303 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1970); McBride v. Duckworth, 232 So.2d 122 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1969).

1933In City of Lake Charles v. Lake Charles Ry., Light & Waterworks Co., 144 La. 221 , 80 So. 260, 261 , the court adopted a definition of irreparable injury, viz.: “An irreparable injury is one for which the party injured cannot be compensated adequately in damages, or for which the damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard.” See, also, State v. Brunot, 112 La. 425 , 36 So. 481 ; Adams v. Rustan, 3 La.

1933In City of Lake Charles v. Lake Charles Ry., Light & Waterworks Co., 144 La. 221 , 80 So. 260, 261 , the court adopted a definition of irreparable injury, viz.: “An irreparable injury is one for which the party injured cannot be compensated adequately in damages, or for which the damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard.” See, also, State v. Brunot, 112 La. 425 , 36 So. 481 ; Adams v. Rustan, 3 La.

1962Bayou Sara Lumber Co.] v. Brunot, 112 La. 425 , 36 So. 481 ; Adams v. Ruston, 3 La.App. 188 . * * * * * * "Where there is an adequate remedy at law, resort to injunction should not be upheld." In the instant cause the quoted allegations of plaintiff's petition clearly entitled plaintiff to the legal remedy of sequestration as authorized by Article 3571 LSA-C.C.P. which provides as follows: "Art. 3571.

1933In City of Lake Charles v. Lake Charles Ry., Light & Waterworks Co., 144 La. 221 , 80 So. 260, 261 , the court adopted a definition of irreparable injury, viz.: “An irreparable injury is one for which the party injured cannot be compensated adequately in damages, or for which the damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard.” See, also, State v. Brunot, 112 La. 425 , 36 So. 481 ; Adams v. Rustan, 3 La.

2024App. 4 Cir. 2/13/19), 265 So.3d 1143 , 1146). 4 Regarding the first element, irreparable injury is “a loss sustained by an injured party which cannot be adequately compensated in money damages or for which such damages cannot be measured by a pecuniary standard.” State ex rel.