Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
142 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 2013–2026 84 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
White v. Moodygreen2 sentences2025This requires more than a “rote examination” of the statutory factors, In re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d at 878 , or “tallying the number of statutory factors weighing in favor of or against termination.” In re Gabriella D., 531 S.W.3d at 682 (citing White v. Moody, 171 S.W.3d 187, 193-94 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004)). 2024Further, it “consists of more than tallying the number of statutory factors weighing in favor of or against termination.” Id. (citing White v. Moody, 171 S.W.3d 187, 193-94 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004)). | 122 | 137 |
Gonsewski v. Gonsewskigreen1 sentence2013Gonsewski v. Gonsewski, 350 S.W.3d 99, 105-06, 108-09 (Tenn. 2011) (footnote omitted). -15- We refer to a number of statutory factors in determining the nature and amount of alimony: (1) The relative earning capacity, obligations, needs, and financial resources of each party, including income from pension, profit sharing or retirement plans and all other sources; (2) The relative education and training of each party, the ability and opportunity of each party to secure such education and training, and the necessity of a party to secure further education and training to improve such party’s earn | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Gabriella D.
green
2 sentences2025This requires more than a “rote examination” of the statutory factors, In re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d at 878 , or “tallying the number of statutory factors weighing in favor of or against termination.” In re Gabriella D., 531 S.W.3d at 682 (citing White v. Moody, 171 S.W.3d 187, 193-94 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004)). 2022When the petition was filed in this case, Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113(i) listed nine statutory factors for consideration.4 Determining what is in the best interest of a child “involves more than simply ‘tallying the number of statutory factors weighing in favor of or against termination.’” In re Neveah M., 614 S.W.3d 659 , 679 (Tenn. 2020) (quoting In re Gabriella D., 531 S.W.3d at 682 ). | 19 | 2018–2025 |
In Re Audrey S.
green
2 sentences2025This requires more than a “rote examination” of the statutory factors, In re Audrey S., 182 S.W.3d at 878 , or “tallying the number of statutory factors weighing in favor of or against termination.” In re Gabriella D., 531 S.W.3d at 682 (citing White v. Moody, 171 S.W.3d 187, 193-94 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004)). 2024Further, it “consists of more than tallying the number of statutory factors weighing in favor of or against termination.” Id. (citing White v. Moody, 171 S.W.3d 187, 193-94 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2004)). | 12 | 2019–2025 |
In Re Neveah M.
green
2 sentences2022When the petition was filed in this case, Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113(i) listed nine statutory factors for consideration.4 Determining what is in the best interest of a child “involves more than simply ‘tallying the number of statutory factors weighing in favor of or against termination.’” In re Neveah M., 614 S.W.3d 659 , 679 (Tenn. 2020) (quoting In re Gabriella D., 531 S.W.3d at 682 ). 2021When the petition was filed in this case, Tennessee Code Annotated section 36-1-113(i) listed nine statutory factors for consideration.9 Determining what is in the best interest of a child “involves more than simply ‘tallying the number of statutory factors weighing in favor of or against termination.’” In re Neveah M., 614 S.W.3d at 679 (citing In re Gabriella D., 531 S.W.3d at 682 ). | 3 | 2021–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.