10 Texas opinions name it 4 courts 1913–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Young v. Younggreen2 sentences2004"When issues are referred to and heard by a master under rule 171, the master's report is conclusive on all issues except those specifically objected to." Young v. Young , 854 S.W.2d 698 , 701 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1993, writ denied). 2004“When issues are referred to and heard by a master under rule 171, the master’s report is conclusive on all issues except those specifically objected to.” Young v. Young, 854 S.W.2d 698, 701 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1993, writ denied). | 1 | 2 |
Comet Aluminum Company v. Dibrellgreen1 sentence2008“Rendition is the judicial act by which the court settles and declares the decision of the law upon the matters at issue.” Comet Aluminum Co. v. Dibrell , 450 S.W.2d 56, 58 (Tex. 1970) (quoting Coleman v. Zapp , 105 Tex. 491 , 151 S.W. 1040, 1041 (Tex. 1912)). | 1 | 1 |
Coleman v. Zappgreen2 sentences2008“Rendition is the judicial act by which the court settles and declares the decision of the law upon the matters at issue.” Comet Aluminum Co. v. Dibrell , 450 S.W.2d 56, 58 (Tex. 1970) (quoting Coleman v. Zapp , 105 Tex. 491 , 151 S.W. 1040, 1041 (Tex. 1912)). 2008“Rendition is the judicial act by which the court settles and declares the decision of the law upon the matters at issue.” Comet Aluminum Co. v. Dibrell , 450 S.W.2d 56, 58 (Tex. 1970) (quoting Coleman v. Zapp , 105 Tex. 491 , 151 S.W. 1040, 1041 (Tex. 1912)). | 1 | 1 |
Cameron v. Camerongreen1 sentence1993Minnich v. Jones, 799 S.W.2d 327, 328 (Tex.App. — Texarkana 1990, no writ); Martin, 797 S.W.2d at 350 ; Cameron v. Cameron, 601 S.W.2d 814, 815 (Tex.Civ.App. — Dallas 1980, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
Minnich v. Jonesgreen1 sentence1993Minnich v. Jones, 799 S.W.2d 327, 328 (Tex.App. — Texarkana 1990, no writ); Martin, 797 S.W.2d at 350 ; Cameron v. Cameron, 601 S.W.2d 814, 815 (Tex.Civ.App. — Dallas 1980, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
Janecka v. Stategreen1 sentence1992Furthermore, the order of this Court in remanding the case for said hearing stated explicitly “The trial court shall hold a hearing to allow appellant to more fully develop his allegation of harm.” Janec-ka v. State, supra, at 842. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martin v. Martin
green
1 sentence1993Minnich v. Jones, 799 S.W.2d 327, 328 (Tex.App. — Texarkana 1990, no writ); Martin, 797 S.W.2d at 350 ; Cameron v. Cameron, 601 S.W.2d 814, 815 (Tex.Civ.App. — Dallas 1980, no writ). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Walker v. Temple Trust Co.
green
1 sentence1989Clearly, by ignoring any underlying contract which may have existed between the appellant and appellee, the court here did not interpret the contract in all of it’s parts and as a whole, and thereby departed “from the master principle of construction — the ascertainment of the real intention of the parties.” Walker, supra, 80 S.W.2d at 937 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Matter of Carrillo
green
2 sentences1977P. Carrillo, 542 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.1976), we must determine the effect on this proceeding of two events outside the control of this court: (1) the acts of misconduct found by the Master and the Commission occurred before Judge Bates was re-elected District Judge on November 2, 1976; and (2) there was a concurrent criminal proceeding against Judge Bates, which began on November 1, 1976, which involved the same facts which were before the Master at the hearing. 1977P. Carrillo, 542 S.W.2d 105 (Tex.1976), we must determine the effect on this proceeding of two events outside the control of this court: (1) the acts of misconduct found by the Master and the Commission occurred before Judge Bates was re-elected District Judge on November 2, 1976; and (2) there was a concurrent criminal proceeding against Judge Bates, which began on November 1, 1976, which involved the same facts which were before the Master at the hearing. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. Russell
green
2 sentences1975Fort Worth Elevators Company v. Russell, 123 Tex. 128 , 70 S.W.2d 397 (1934). 1975Fort Worth Elevators Company v. Russell, 123 Tex. 128 , 70 S.W.2d 397 (1934). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Newspapers, Inc. v. Love
green
1 sentence1973“Certainly if the right of control of details has a contractual basis, the circumstance that no actual control was exercised will not absolve the master of liability.” Newspapers, Inc. v. Love, (Tex.Sup., 1964) 380 S. W.2d 582, 589 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Hennegan
green
1 sentence1913Railway Co. v. Hennegan, 33 Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.