10 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Robalin v. Stategreen2 sentences2010When a trial court erroneously refuses a properly requested instruction on a lesser-included offense, such that the jury’s only option is to convict or acquit on the main charge, a finding of harm is automatic, Robalin v. State, 224 S.W.3d 470, 477 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.), because the jury was denied the opportunity to convict the defendant of the lesser offense. 2009When a trial court improperly refuses a properly requested instruction on a lesser-included offense, such that the jury's only option is to convict or acquit on the main charge, a finding of harm is automatic, Roblain v. State , 224 S.W.3d 470, 477 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.), because the jury was denied the opportunity to convict the defendant of the lesser offense. | 3 | 3 |
Ray v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Brock, 295 S.W.3d at 49 ; see Ray v. State, 106 S.W.3d 299, 303 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (citing Saunders v. State, 913 S.W.2d 564, 571 (Tex. Crim. 2009Ray v. State , 106 S.W.3d 299, 303 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (citing Saunders v. State , 106 S.W.2d 564, 571 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Jones v. Stategreen2 sentences2024Jones v. State, 544 S.W.2d 139, 142 (Tex. Crim. 2022Jones v. State, 544 S.W.2d 139, 142 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Crown Life Insurance Company v. Casteelgreen2 sentences2011Co. v. Casteel, 22 S.W.3d 378, 388 (Tex. 2000) (holding that "when a trial court submits a single broad-form liability question incorporating multiple theories of liability, the error is harmful and a new trial is required when an appellate court cannot determine whether the jury based its verdict on an improperly submitted invalid theory"); with Thomas v. Uzoka, 290 S.W.3d 437, 446 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (finding that because a requested instruction would not have produced a different outcome, the denial of a properly requested instruction was not harmful because a 2011Co. v. Casteel, 22 S.W.3d 378, 388 (Tex. 2000) (holding that "when a trial court submits a single broad-form liability question incorporating multiple theories of liability, the error is harmful and a new trial is required when an appellate court cannot determine whether the jury based its verdict on an improperly submitted invalid theory"); with Thomas v. Uzoka, 290 S.W.3d 437, 446 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (finding that because a requested instruction would not have produced a different outcome, the denial of a properly requested instruction was not harmful because a | 2 | 2 |
Thomas v. Uzokagreen2 sentences2011Co. v. Casteel, 22 S.W.3d 378, 388 (Tex. 2000) (holding that "when a trial court submits a single broad-form liability question incorporating multiple theories of liability, the error is harmful and a new trial is required when an appellate court cannot determine whether the jury based its verdict on an improperly submitted invalid theory"); with Thomas v. Uzoka, 290 S.W.3d 437, 446 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (finding that because a requested instruction would not have produced a different outcome, the denial of a properly requested instruction was not harmful because a 2011Co. v. Casteel, 22 S.W.3d 378, 388 (Tex. 2000) (holding that "when a trial court submits a single broad-form liability question incorporating multiple theories of liability, the error is harmful and a new trial is required when an appellate court cannot determine whether the jury based its verdict on an improperly submitted invalid theory"); with Thomas v. Uzoka, 290 S.W.3d 437, 446 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. denied) (finding that because a requested instruction would not have produced a different outcome, the denial of a properly requested instruction was not harmful because a | 2 | 2 |
Saunders v. Stategreen2 sentences2010Brock, 295 S.W.3d at 49 ; see Ray v. State, 106 S.W.3d 299, 303 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (citing Saunders v. State, 913 S.W.2d 564, 571 (Tex. Crim. 2009Ray v. State, 106 S.W.3d 299, 303 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (citing Saunders v. State, 913 S.W.2d 564, 571 (Tex.Crim.App.1995)). | 2 | 2 |
Shaw v. Stategreen1 sentence2024Shaw v. State, 243 S.W.3d 647, 658 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Jenkins v. Stategreen1 sentence2019See Jenkins v. State, 912 S.W.2d 793, 814 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Masterson v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See Masterson v. State , 155 S.W.3d 167, 171 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Hawkinsongreen1 sentence2009Ray v. State , 106 S.W.3d 299, 303 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (citing Saunders v. State , 106 S.W.2d 564, 571 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brock v. State
green
1 sentence2010Brock, 295 S.W.3d at 49 ; see Ray v. State, 106 S.W.3d 299, 303 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no pet.) (citing Saunders v. State, 913 S.W.2d 564, 571 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.