results of the polygraph test (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

results of the polygraph test in Texas

10 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

CaseFollowedCited
Hudson v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1984 · cited in 5 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2009
2 sentences

2009See Hudson v. State , 675 S.W.2d 507, 511 (Tex.Crim.App. 1984) (holding that defense counsel must object each time allegedly inadmissible evidence is offered); Ethington v. State , 819 S.W.2d 854, 858-59 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (approving the use of a continuous or running objection to an entire line of questions).

2009See Hudson v. State, 675 S.W.2d 507, 511 (Tex.Crim.App. 1984) (holding that defense counsel must object each time allegedly inadmissible evidence is offered); Ethington v. State, 819 S.W.2d 854, 858-59 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (approving the use of a continuous or running objection to an entire line of questions).

55
Ethington v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1991 · cited in 5 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2009
2 sentences

2009See Hudson v. State , 675 S.W.2d 507, 511 (Tex.Crim.App. 1984) (holding that defense counsel must object each time allegedly inadmissible evidence is offered); Ethington v. State , 819 S.W.2d 854, 858-59 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (approving the use of a continuous or running objection to an entire line of questions).

2009See Hudson v. State, 675 S.W.2d 507, 511 (Tex.Crim.App. 1984) (holding that defense counsel must object each time allegedly inadmissible evidence is offered); Ethington v. State, 819 S.W.2d 854, 858-59 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991) (approving the use of a continuous or running objection to an entire line of questions).

55
Robinson v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1977 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007
2 sentences

2007The State did not introduce the results of the polygraph test, which would be inadmissible, see Robinson v. State , 550 S.W.2d 54, 59 (Tex. Crim.

2007The State did not introduce the results of the polygraph test, which would be inadmissible, see Robinson v. State, 550 S.W.2d 54, 59 (Tex.Crim.App. *852 1977), but, instead, introduced admissions that Harty made during the course of the pretest interview.

22
Tennard v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 683 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990); Nethery v. State, 692 S.W.2d 686, 700 (Tex.Crim.App.1985); Fernandez v. State, 564 S.W.2d 771, 773 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978).

2001Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 683 (Tex.Crim.App.1990); Nethery v. State, 692 S.W.2d 686, 700 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Fernandez v. State, 564 S.W.2d 771, 773 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978).

11
Fernandez v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1978 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 683 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990); Nethery v. State, 692 S.W.2d 686, 700 (Tex.Crim.App.1985); Fernandez v. State, 564 S.W.2d 771, 773 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978).

2001Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 683 (Tex.Crim.App.1990); Nethery v. State, 692 S.W.2d 686, 700 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Fernandez v. State, 564 S.W.2d 771, 773 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978).

11
Nethery v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1985 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 683 (Tex.Crim.App. 1990); Nethery v. State, 692 S.W.2d 686, 700 (Tex.Crim.App.1985); Fernandez v. State, 564 S.W.2d 771, 773 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978).

2001Tennard v. State, 802 S.W.2d 678, 683 (Tex.Crim.App.1990); Nethery v. State, 692 S.W.2d 686, 700 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Fernandez v. State, 564 S.W.2d 771, 773 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Sparks v. State green
texapp · 1991
1 sentence

2014Buckley, 46 S.W.3d at 337 (citing Sparks v. State, 820 S.W.2d 924 , 927–30 (Tex. App.—Austin 1991, no pet.)). 6 White’s answer was in response to a question by Murray, not the State.

12014–2014
Buckley v. State green
texapp · 2001
1 sentence

2014Buckley, 46 S.W.3d at 337 (citing Sparks v. State, 820 S.W.2d 924 , 927–30 (Tex. App.—Austin 1991, no pet.)). 6 White’s answer was in response to a question by Murray, not the State.

12014–2014
Roper v. State green
texcrimapp · 1964
1 sentence

2009Id. at 457 .

12009–2009

Where else courts name it

TX 10 (2001–2014) NJ 7 (1975–2024) NY 6 (1985–2010) IL 5 (1975–2026) PA 3 (1986–2011) NM 3 (1961–1994) OH 3 (1990–2012) GA 3 (1981–1986) TN 2 (2005–2005) MI 2 (1968–2017) MD 2 (1976–1995) NC 2 (1981–1982) FL 2 (1978–1987) MA 2 (1975–1976) MT 2 (1993–2007) WI 2 (2013–2013) AL 2 (1989–2002) CO 2 (1972–1981)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check