10 Virginia opinions name it 5 courts 1995–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Glasco v. Ballardgreen2 sentences2007"The doctrine of collateral estoppel precludes the same parties to a prior proceeding from litigating in a subsequent proceeding any issue of fact that was actually litigated and essential to a final judgment in the first proceeding." Glasco v. Ballard, 249 Va. 61, 64 , 452 S.E.2d 854, 855 (1995). [B]efore the doctrine of collateral estoppel may be applied, four requirements must be met: (1) the parties to the two proceedings must be the same; (2) the factual issue sought to be litigated must have been actually litigated in the prior proceeding; (3) the factual issue must have been essential t 2007"The doctrine of collateral estoppel precludes the same parties to a prior proceeding from litigating in a subsequent proceeding any issue of fact that was actually litigated and essential to a final judgment in the first proceeding." Glasco v. Ballard, 249 Va. 61, 64 , 452 S.E.2d 854, 855 (1995). [B]efore the doctrine of collateral estoppel may be applied, four requirements must be met: (1) the parties to the two proceedings must be the same; (2) the factual issue sought to be litigated must have been actually litigated in the prior proceeding; (3) the factual issue must have been essential t | 4 | 6 |
Bates v. Deversgreen2 sentences1997"The doctrine of collateral estoppel precludes the same parties to a prior proceeding from litigating in a subsequent proceeding any issue of fact that was actually litigated and essential to a final judgment in the first proceeding." Glasco v. Ballard, 249 Va. 61, 64 , 452 S.E.2d 854, 855 (1995) (citing Bates v. Devers, 214 Va. 667, 671 , 202 S.E.2d 917, 921 (1974)). 1997"The doctrine of collateral estoppel precludes the same parties to a prior proceeding from litigating in a subsequent proceeding any issue of fact that was actually litigated and essential to a final judgment in the first proceeding." Glasco v. Ballard, 249 Va. 61, 64 , 452 S.E.2d 854, 855 (1995) (citing Bates v. Devers, 214 Va. 667, 671 , 202 S.E.2d 917, 921 (1974)). | 2 | 4 |
Whitley v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2007Whitley v. Commonwealth, 260 Va. 482, 489 , 538 S.E.2d 296, 299 (2000). 2007Whitley v. Commonwealth, 260 Va. 482, 489 , 538 S.E.2d 296, 299 (2000). | 2 | 3 |
Loudon Hospital Center v. Robert B. Stroude, M.D.green1 sentence2009Center v. Stroube, 50 Va. App. 478, 492 (2007) (recognizing the doctrine may apply to an administrative proceeding relating to issuance of COPN) (authority omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.