9 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 2009–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation of the Stategreen2 sentences2018Interpretation of Court Rules The interpretation of a court rule is reviewed de novo, Sierra Club v. Dep't of Transp. , 120 Hawai'i 181 , 197, 202 P.3d 1226 , 1242 (2009), and "[w]hen interpreting rules promulgated by the court, principles of statutory construction apply." Gap v. Puna Geothermal Venture , 106 Hawai'i 325 , 331, 104 P.3d 912 , 918 (2004) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 2018Interpretation of Court Rules The interpretation of a court rule is reviewed de novo, Sierra Club v. Dep't of Transp. , 120 Hawai'i 181 , 197, 202 P.3d 1226 , 1242 (2009), and "[w]hen interpreting rules promulgated by the court, principles of statutory construction apply." Gap v. Puna Geothermal Venture , 106 Hawai'i 325 , 331, 104 P.3d 912 , 918 (2004) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). | 4 | 5 |
State v. Choy Foo.green2 sentences2023The State contends that: [W]here a complaint previously electronically filed and then read aloud to the defendant and defense counsel prior to trial with no request for a continuance by defense counsel or other indication of prejudice, the State asserts that HRPP Rule 7(a) has been complied with or, in the alternative, no prejudice has resulted and thus any error would be harmless[.] "The interpretation of a court rule is reviewed de novo . . . ." State v. Choy Foo, 142 Hawai‘i 65, 72, 414 P.3d 117, 124 (2018) (citation omitted). 2021(Underscoring added.) "The interpretation of a court rule is reviewed de novo[.]" State v. Choy Foo, 142 Hawai#i 65, 72, 414 P.3d 117, 124 (2018) (citation omitted). | 4 | 4 |
Gap v. Puna Geothermal Venturegreen2 sentences2018Interpretation of Court Rules The interpretation of a court rule is reviewed de novo, Sierra Club v. Dep't of Transp. , 120 Hawai'i 181 , 197, 202 P.3d 1226 , 1242 (2009), and "[w]hen interpreting rules promulgated by the court, principles of statutory construction apply." Gap v. Puna Geothermal Venture , 106 Hawai'i 325 , 331, 104 P.3d 912 , 918 (2004) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 2018Interpretation of Court Rules The interpretation of a court rule is reviewed de novo, Sierra Club v. Dep't of Transp. , 120 Hawai'i 181 , 197, 202 P.3d 1226 , 1242 (2009), and "[w]hen interpreting rules promulgated by the court, principles of statutory construction apply." Gap v. Puna Geothermal Venture , 106 Hawai'i 325 , 331, 104 P.3d 912 , 918 (2004) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Barongreen2 sentences2015See State v. Baron, 80 Hawai'i 107, 113 , 905 P.2d 613, 619 (1995). 2015See State v. Baron, 80 Hawai'i 107, 113 , 905 P.2d 613, 619 (1995). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.