9 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Callaghan Paving, Inc. v. Keeneyville Construction Co.green2 sentences2002App. 3d 937, 939 , 557 N.E.2d 228, 229 (1990) (a plaintiff may only amend a complaint to add a claim against a new party with leave of court, and an amended complaint adding additional parties filed without leave of court is a nullity); First Robinson Savings & Loan v. Ledo Construction Co., 210 Ill. 2002Dec. 458 , 557 N.E.2d 228, 229 (1990) (a plaintiff may only amend a complaint to add a claim against a new party with leave of court, and an amended complaint adding additional parties filed without leave of court is a nullity); First Robinson Savings & Loan v. Ledo Construction Co., 210 Ill.App.3d 889, 892-93 , 155 Ill.Dec. 304 , 569 N.E.2d 304, 306-08 (1991) (there is no absolute right to amend a pleading; filing an amended pleading adding new parties without leave of court is a nullity; a nullity tolls no statute of limitation). | 2 | 3 |
Stichauf v. Cermak Road Realtygreen2 sentences2007Stichauf v. Cermak Road Realty, 236 Ill. 2007Stichauf v. Cermak Road Realty, 236 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
First Robinson Savings & Loan v. Ledo Construction Co.green2 sentences2002App. 3d 937, 939 , 557 N.E.2d 228, 229 (1990) (a plaintiff may only amend a complaint to add a claim against a new party with leave of court, and an amended complaint adding additional parties filed without leave of court is a nullity); First Robinson Savings & Loan v. Ledo Construction Co., 210 Ill. 2002Dec. 458 , 557 N.E.2d 228, 229 (1990) (a plaintiff may only amend a complaint to add a claim against a new party with leave of court, and an amended complaint adding additional parties filed without leave of court is a nullity); First Robinson Savings & Loan v. Ledo Construction Co., 210 Ill.App.3d 889, 892-93 , 155 Ill.Dec. 304 , 569 N.E.2d 304, 306-08 (1991) (there is no absolute right to amend a pleading; filing an amended pleading adding new parties without leave of court is a nullity; a nullity tolls no statute of limitation). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Estate of Nicholson
green
1 sentence2025Id. ¶ 26 In the instant case, plaintiff orally requested leave to amend the complaint to add a claim or claims of willful and wanton conduct. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Ledeaux v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2024Conclusion ¶ 71 In case number 1-22-0891, we reverse the order granting summary judgment for Motorola on Ledeaux’s negligence and willful and wanton conduct counts and denying him leave to amend his complaint to add a claim for punitive damages and remand for further proceedings. ¶ 72 In case number 1-22-0886, we reverse the order granting summary judgment for Motorola on Arballo’s negligence and willful and wanton conduct counts and denying him leave to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages and remand for further proceedings. ¶ 73 No. 1-22-0886, Reversed and remanded. ¶ 74 N | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Fernandez v. Motorola Solutions, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2024We affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of Motorola on Johnson’s parents’ claim for parental loss of child consortium. ¶ 86 No. 1-22-0884, Reversed and remanded. ¶ 87 No. 1-22-0892, Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. -27- Nos. 1-22-0884 & 1-22-0892 (consolidated) Fernandez v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., 2024 IL App (1st) 220884 Decision Under Review: Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, Nos, 19-L- 10156, 10-L-7695; the Hon. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Petrella v. Leisky
green
1 sentence1990(Petrella v. Leisky (1981), 92 Ill. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.