9 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1982–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kim v. Alvey, Inc.green2 sentences2022See McMackin v. Weberpal Roofing, Inc., 2011 IL App (2d) 100461, ¶ 32 ; Kim v. Alvey, Inc., 322 Ill. 2011See Kim v. Alvey, Inc., 322 Ill. | 3 | 3 |
U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchengreen2 sentences2016US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 569 U.S. ___ , ___, 133 S. Ct. 1537, 1545 (2013). 2016US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 569 U.S. ___ , ___, 133 S. Ct. 1537, 1545 (2013). | 2 | 2 |
McMackin v. Weberpal Roofinggreen1 sentence2022See McMackin v. Weberpal Roofing, Inc., 2011 IL App (2d) 100461, ¶ 32 ; Kim v. Alvey, Inc., 322 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Salmonella Litigation
green
2 sentences2022In Salmonella, the court held that the double recovery doctrine “should not apply to settlements because a settlement is a contract which governs the plaintiff’s recovery.” Salmonella, 249 Ill. 2001App. 3d 173, 183 , 618 N.E.2d 487 (1993), the court held that the double recovery doctrine “should not apply to settlements because a settlement is a contract which governs the plaintiffs recovery.” In Salmonella, the plaintiffs received certain sums from their insurance carrier under their employee health benefits insurance. | 3 | 2001–2022 |
Branum v. SLEZAK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY INC.
green
1 sentence2011Kim, 322 Ill.App.3d at 672 , 255 Ill.Dec. 267 , 749 N.E.2d 368 . ¶ 33 Weberpal cites Branum, 289 Ill. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Popovich v. Ram Pipe & Supply Co.
green
1 sentence1991(Popovich v. Ram Pipe & Supply Co. (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 203, 209 ; Dial v. City of O’Fallon (1980), 81 Ill. 2d 548, 558 .) The rationale supporting punitive damages is different because a punitive damage award is not directed at compensating a plaintiff’s injury but is directed at punishing a defendant’s actions. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Dial v. City of O'Fallon
green
1 sentence1991(Popovich v. Ram Pipe & Supply Co. (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 203, 209 ; Dial v. City of O’Fallon (1980), 81 Ill. 2d 548, 558 .) The rationale supporting punitive damages is different because a punitive damage award is not directed at compensating a plaintiff’s injury but is directed at punishing a defendant’s actions. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Glidden v. Farmers Automobile Insurance
green
2 sentences1982Glidden v. Farmers Automobile Insurance Association (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 330 , 312 N.E.2d 247 (payments under the medical coverage); Hoel v. Crum & Forster Insurance Co. (1977), 51 Ill. 1982Glidden v. Farmers Automobile Insurance Association (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 330 , 312 N.E.2d 247 (payments under the medical coverage); Hoel v. Crum & Forster Insurance Co. (1977), 51 Ill. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Hoel v. Crum & Forster Insurance
green
1 sentence1982Glidden v. Farmers Automobile Insurance Association (1974), 57 Ill. 2d 330 , 312 N.E.2d 247 (payments under the medical coverage); Hoel v. Crum & Forster Insurance Co. (1977), 51 Ill. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.