double recovery challenge in Texas

15 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

Case	Followed	Cited
Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Garzagreen tex · 2012 · cited in 5 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2015 2 sentences 2015See also Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Garza, 371 S.W.3d 157, 162 (Tex.2012) ("The basis of a double recovery challenge is that a party recovered twice for one injury."). 2012See, e.g., Allan v. Nersesova, 307 S.W.3d 564, 574 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2010, no pet.) (citing Casteel, 22 S.W.3d at 390 ; and Vanasek, 50 S.W.3d at 10 ); see also Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Garza, 371 S.W.3d 157, 162 (Tex.2012) (“The basis of a double recovery challenge is that a party recovered twice for one injury.”).	5	5
Crown Life Insurance Company v. Casteelgreen tex · 2000 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012See, e.g., Allan v. Nersesova, 307 S.W.3d 564, 574 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2010, no pet.) (citing Casteel, 22 S.W.3d at 390 ; and Vanasek, 50 S.W.3d at 10 ); see also Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Garza, 371 S.W.3d 157, 162 (Tex.2012) (“The basis of a double recovery challenge is that a party recovered twice for one injury.”). 2012See, e.g., Allan v. Nersesova , 307 S.W.3d 564, 574 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.) (citing Casteel , 22 S.W.3d at 390 ; and Vanasek , 50 S.W.3d at 10 ); see also Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Garza , No. 10-0435, 2012 WL 2361721, at *3 (Tex. June 22, 2012) (“The basis of a double recovery challenge is that a party recovered twice for one injury.”).	2	2
Allan v. Nersesovagreen texapp · 2010 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012See, e.g., Allan v. Nersesova, 307 S.W.3d 564, 574 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2010, no pet.) (citing Casteel, 22 S.W.3d at 390 ; and Vanasek, 50 S.W.3d at 10 ); see also Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Garza, 371 S.W.3d 157, 162 (Tex.2012) (“The basis of a double recovery challenge is that a party recovered twice for one injury.”). 2012See, e.g., Allan v. Nersesova , 307 S.W.3d 564, 574 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.) (citing Casteel , 22 S.W.3d at 390 ; and Vanasek , 50 S.W.3d at 10 ); see also Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Garza , No. 10-0435, 2012 WL 2361721, at *3 (Tex. June 22, 2012) (“The basis of a double recovery challenge is that a party recovered twice for one injury.”).	2	2
Waite Hill Services, Inc. v. World Class Metal Works, Inc.green tex · 1998 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See Waite Hill Servs., Inc. v. World Class Metal Works, Inc ., 959 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex. 1998) (per curiam). 2010See Waite Hill Servs., Inc. v. World Class Metal Works, Inc., 959 S.W.2d 182, 184 (Tex.1998) (per curiam).	2	2
Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. Kraftgreen tex · 2002 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 2 sentences 2008See Kraft , 77 S.W.3d at 810 (reversing and remanding case to the trial court for further proceedings when appraisal testimony was not shown to be reliable). (3) Double Recovery In issue five, Royce contends that the trial court erroneously awarded a double recovery to Humphrey by allowing him to recover damages under both Questions 2(a) and 2(b). 2008See Kraft, 77 S.W.3d at 810 (reversing and remanding case to the trial court for further proceedings when appraisal testimony was not shown to be reliable). 3 Double Recovery In issue five, Royce contends that the trial court erroneously awarded a double recovery to Humphrey by allowing him to recover damages under both Questions 2(a) and 2(b).	2	2
Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury Chapagreen tex · 2006 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2024 2 sentences 2024Liability and Damages In their fifth and multifarious issue, appellants ask this court to reverse and remand because “(i) this was a simple breach of contract case that did not rise to the level of actionable Deceptive Practice Act; and (ii) the damages awarded violated a double recovery rule or not segregated.” Appellants cite as sole authority Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P., v. Chapa, 212 S.W.3d 299 , 303–04 (Tex. 2006). 2012See, e.g., Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. v. Chapa, 212 S.W.3d 299, 303 (Tex.2006) (“‘There can be but one recovery for one injury, and the fact that ... there may be more than one theory of liability[ ] does not modify this rule.’” (alterations in original) (quoting Stewart Title Guar.	1	2
Hunter v. PRICEKUBECKA, PLLCgreen texapp · 2011 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 1 sentence 2012See Hunter v. PriceKubecka, PLLC, 339 S.W.3d 795, 802 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2011, no pet.) (citing City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802, 821-28 (Tex.2005)).	1	1
City of Keller v. Wilsongreen tex · 2005 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 1 sentence 2012See Hunter v. PriceKubecka, PLLC, 339 S.W.3d 795, 802 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2011, no pet.) (citing City of Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802, 821-28 (Tex.2005)).	1	1
Bradshaw v. Baylor Universitygreen tex · 1935 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1981–1981 2 sentences 1981Bradshaw v. Baylor University, 126 Tex. 99 , 84 S.W.2d 703, 705 (Tex.Comm’n.App.1935, opinion adopted). 1981Bradshaw v. Baylor University, 126 Tex. 99 , 84 S.W.2d 703, 705 (Tex.Comm’n.App.1935, opinion adopted).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

Case	Cited	Years
Vanasek v. Underkofler green texapp · 1999 2 sentences 2012See, e.g., Allan v. Nersesova, 307 S.W.3d 564, 574 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2010, no pet.) (citing Casteel, 22 S.W.3d at 390 ; and Vanasek, 50 S.W.3d at 10 ); see also Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Garza, 371 S.W.3d 157, 162 (Tex.2012) (“The basis of a double recovery challenge is that a party recovered twice for one injury.”). 2012See, e.g., Allan v. Nersesova , 307 S.W.3d 564, 574 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.) (citing Casteel , 22 S.W.3d at 390 ; and Vanasek , 50 S.W.3d at 10 ); see also Weeks Marine, Inc. v. Garza , No. 10-0435, 2012 WL 2361721, at *3 (Tex. June 22, 2012) (“The basis of a double recovery challenge is that a party recovered twice for one injury.”).	2	2012–2012
Pitman v. Lightfoot green texapp · 1996 2 sentences 2015No appellant argued at Jamie Graham Page 78 of 79 937 S.W.2d 496, 539 ; 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 3531 , 141 trial that the appellees’ damages should be the double recovery rule, we deny these reduced or in some way impacted by points of error as moot. indemnity or contribution. 2015No appellant argued at Jamie Graham Page 78 of 79 937 S.W.2d 496, 539 ; 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 3531 , **141 trial that the appellees’ damages should be the double recovery rule, we deny these reduced or in some way impacted by points of error as moot. indemnity or contribution.	1	2015–2015
Fina Supply, Inc. v. Abilene National Bank green tex · 1987 1 sentence 1995Fina , 726 S.W.2d at 541 .	1	1995–1995

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TX § Tex. Water Code § 11.086 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 15 (1981–2024) IL 9 (1982–2022) NV 4 (2010–2021) CT 3 (1999–2021) CA 3 (1992–2023) AZ 2 (1994–2021) DE 2 (2023–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check