9 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Hernandezgreen2 sentences2012Hernandez, 231 Ill. 2d at 151-52 . ¶ 47 In a last-ditch effort, the State argues that the Hernandez rule does not apply because it has been superceded by the United States Supreme Court case of Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162 . 2012Hernandez, 231 Ill. 2d at 151-52 . ¶ 47 In a last-ditch effort, the State argues that the Hernandez rule does not apply because it has been superceded by the United States Supreme Court case of Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162 . | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
green
2 sentences2021Id. ¶ 11 Hernandez’s motion to alter or amend the judgment was rejected following a hearing, and she appealed to the United States Circuit Court for the Seventh Circuit. 2020Id. ¶ 11 Hernandez’s motion to alter or amend the judgment was rejected following a hearing, and she appealed to the United States Circuit Court for the Seventh Circuit. | 2 | 2020–2021 |
In re Hernandez
green
2 sentences2021In re Hernandez, 918 F.3d 563 (7th Cir. 2019). 2020In re Hernandez, 918 F.3d 563 (7th Cir. 2019). | 2 | 2020–2021 |
Estate of Heanue Ex Rel. Heanue v. Edgcomb
green
2 sentences2008Good-Faith Discovery The trial court granted Mr. Hernandez’s motion for supplemental discovery after the decision in Estate of Heanue v. Edgcomb, 355 Ill. 2008Good Faith Discovery The trial court granted Mr. Hernandez’s motion for supplemental discovery after the decision in Estate of Heanue v. Edgcomb, 355 Ill. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Yost
green
1 sentence2022Yost, 2021 IL 126187, ¶ 60 ; see also Hernandez, 231 Ill.2d at 139 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Mickens v. Taylor
green
2 sentences2012Hernandez, 231 Ill. 2d at 151-52 . ¶ 47 In a last-ditch effort, the State argues that the Hernandez rule does not apply because it has been superceded by the United States Supreme Court case of Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162 . 2012Hernandez, 231 Ill. 2d at 151-52 . ¶ 47 In a last-ditch effort, the State argues that the Hernandez rule does not apply because it has been superceded by the United States Supreme Court case of Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
People v. Garrett
green
2 sentences1993The State relies on People v. Garrett (1990), 139 Ill. 2d 189 , and maintains that because the trial judge never ruled that a prima facie case had been established, we should consider, in view of all the circumstances, whether he could have concluded the existence of a prima facie case. 1993The State relies on People v. Garrett (1990), 139 Ill. 2d 189 , and maintains that because the trial judge never ruled that a prima facie case had been established, we should consider, in view of all the circumstances, whether he could have concluded the existence of a prima facie case. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Lundy v. Warden
green
1 sentence1984Ed. 2d 299 , 99 S. Ct. 2862 .) Notwithstanding the fact, that Hernandez bore the responsibility of making sure that his record on appeal was complete, and the fact that the appellate court’s file on a particular case {i.e., motion to set bail pending appeal) is not the common law record which is to be reviewed by this court, we will consider defendant Hernandez’ motion for a new trial and petition to vacate his conviction. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.