9 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Barteltgreen2 sentences2011In addition, seizure analysis was also used by the dissenting justice, who asserted that "[a] police officer who has stopped a vehicle for a traffic violation does not have unbridled authority to order and conduct chemical tests," and that under these facts it was impermissible for the officer to " order[ ] the occupants of the vehicle to engage in testing." (Emphases added.) 384 Ill.App.3d at 1036 , 323 Ill. 2011In addition, seizure analysis was also used by the dissenting justice, who asserted that "[a] police officer who has stopped a vehicle for a traffic violation does not have unbridled authority to order and conduct chemical tests," and that under these facts it was impermissible for the officer to " order[ ] the occupants of the vehicle to engage in testing." (Emphases added.) 384 Ill.App.3d at 1036 , 323 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Harris
green
2 sentences2010In Harris, 228 Ill. 2d at 232-38 , 886 N.E.2d at 955-58 , the supreme court held that when a police officer stops a vehicle for a traffic violation, passengers of that vehicle are lawfully seized, even if there is no individualized suspicion of criminal activity on his part at the time of the stop. 2010In Harris, 228 Ill. 2d at 232-38 , 886 N.E.2d at 955-58 , the supreme court held that when a police officer stops a vehicle for a traffic violation, passengers of that vehicle are lawfully seized, even if there is no individualized suspicion of criminal activity on his part at the time of the stop. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
People v. Evans
green
2 sentences2000People v. Evans , 259 Ill. 2000People v. Evans, 259 Ill. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
People v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2020At the time the officers stopped the vehicle for a traffic violation, “the officers had probable cause to believe that the driver had committed a traffic infraction and, therefore, lawfully seized both the driver and passenger of that vehicle.” Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
United States v. Eddie Fryer
green
1 sentence2020The Fryer court held “[t]hese are clearly the kind of specific, articulable facts that the standard contemplates and which warrant a search.” Fryer, 974 F.2d at 819 . ¶ 31 In this case, at the preliminary hearing Officer Filskov testified that at approximately 11:00 p.m. he stopped a vehicle for a traffic violation. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Zeller
green
1 sentence1979(Accord, People v. Zeller (1977), 51 Ill. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
People v. Smith
green
1 sentence1979App. 3d 952 , 385 N.E.2d 707 , the court upheld the warrantless search of an automobile, including the trunk, finding probable cause where the officer, who had stopped the vehicle for a traffic violation, smelled the odors of alcohol and marijuana emanating from the interior of the vehicle. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.