attempt challenge (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

attempt challenge in Indiana

9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1869–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Dewald v. Stategreen
indctapp · 2008 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015I thus cannot agree with the majority’s “Where’s Waldo” characterization of the statutory scheme. [32] It seems to me that Tiplick’s void-for-vagueness challenge is more akin to an attempt to claim ignorance of the law as a defense to criminal liability. “[I]t is well-settled that ignorance of the law is no excuse for criminal behavior.” Dewald v. State, 898 N.E.2d 488, 493 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008), trans. denied.

2015Dewald v. State, 898 N.E.2d 488, 493 (Ind.Ct.App.2008), trans. denied.

22
Vetor v. Shockeygreen
indctapp · 1980 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1982–1999
2 sentences

1999However, Vetor v. Shockey expressly rejected an attempt to apply the doctrine of implied warranty of habitability to the sale of a used home by a non builder-vendor, reasoning that the vendor has no greater expertise than the purchaser in determining the quality of the house; thus, the implied warranty of habitability is limited to builder-vendors. 414 N.E.2d 575, 577 (Ind.Ct.App.1980).

1982The Court of Appeals in Vetor v. Shockey, (1980) Ind.App., 414 N.E.2d 575, 577 , rejected an attempt to apply the doctrine of an implied warranty of habitability to the sale of a used home by a non-builder-vendor.

12
Marmont v. Stategreen
ind · 1874 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015While Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 49A04-1312-CR-617 | January 27, 2015 Page 15 of 16 “ignorance or mistake in point of fact” may in some circumstances excuse “acts honestly done while so misled,” nevertheless “every man is presumed to know the laws of the country in which he dwells.” Marmont v. State, 48 Ind. 21, 31 (1874). [33] Not having looked to the laws that apply to one’s actions does not excuse an individual from violating those laws.

11
Gibson v. Stategreen
ind · 1994 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
1 sentence

1997Gibson v. State, 643 N.E.2d 885, 892 (Ind.1994).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Tiplick v. State green
indctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2015Id.

12015–2015
Hunter v. Byrd green
indctapp · 1992
1 sentence

2003Id. *556 Here, however, Young filed his Motion to Correct Errors in an attempt to challenge an inconsistent verdict, not an inadequate verdict.

12003–2003
Gary & Interurban Railroad v. Gunn neutral
ind · 1916
2 sentences

1919Co. v. Gunn (1915), 184 Ind. 306 , 111 N. E. 183 ; Hedekin Land, etc., Co. v. Campbell (1916), 184 Ind. 643 , 112 N. E. 97 .

1919Co. v. Gunn (1915), 184 Ind. 306 , 111 N. E. 183 ; Hedekin Land, etc., Co. v. Campbell (1916), 184 Ind. 643 , 112 N. E. 97 .

11919–1919
Hedekin Land & Improvement Co. v. Campbell neutral
ind · 1916
2 sentences

1919Co. v. Gunn (1915), 184 Ind. 306 , 111 N. E. 183 ; Hedekin Land, etc., Co. v. Campbell (1916), 184 Ind. 643 , 112 N. E. 97 .

1919Co. v. Gunn (1915), 184 Ind. 306 , 111 N. E. 183 ; Hedekin Land, etc., Co. v. Campbell (1916), 184 Ind. 643 , 112 N. E. 97 .

11919–1919
State v. Swails green
ind · 1857
1 sentence

1869He refers (§ 677) to the case of The State v. Swails, supra, and precedes a statement of the facts with the following comment: “ If we undertake to split hairs here, and say that there must be, in all cases, a perfect adaptedness in the act performed, and in the circumstances surrounding the prisoner at the time, to accomplish what he meant to do, we shall do away with the doctrine of attempt, as a practical element in the law, almost entirely.

11869–1869

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IN § Ind. Code § 25-26-13-4.1 (3) IN § Ind. Code § 35-48-4-10 (3) IN § Ind. Code § 35-48-4-11 (3) IN § Ind. Code § 4-22-2-37.1 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 56 (1930–2026) IL 35 (1940–2026) FL 31 (1975–2023) NY 23 (1897–2021) OH 21 (1983–2021) PA 18 (1888–2025) TX 16 (1929–2025) MO 16 (1913–2024) MI 14 (1977–2023) TN 14 (1954–2023) WA 13 (1975–2025) NC 11 (1953–2018) GA 11 (1941–2019) CO 11 (1985–2016) NJ 10 (1982–2019) WI 10 (1962–2020) MS 9 (2007–2023) IN 9 (1869–2015) KS 9 (1918–2020) CT 7 (1982–2020) AZ 7 (1966–2022) DC 6 (1975–2019) LA 5 (1914–2024) MA 5 (1943–2008) ND 4 (2001–2018) KY 4 (1876–2001) UT 4 (1953–2020) VA 4 (1990–2024) AR 4 (1997–2024) NE 4 (1897–2017) NV 4 (1971–2017) NM 4 (2008–2026) DE 3 (1988–2016) OR 3 (1911–2008) WV 3 (1915–2016) AK 3 (1982–1984) WY 2 (1979–2012) MN 2 (1975–1999) HI 2 (1980–2025) VT 2 (2010–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check