9 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1994–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hornbucklegreen2 sentences2000State v. Hornbuckle,. 769 S.W.2d 89, 92-93 (Mo. *681 banc 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 860 , 110 S.Ct. 171 , 107 L.Ed.2d 128 (1989). 1994State v. Hornbuckle, 769 S.W.2d at 92-93 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Mooregreen1 sentence2010Defendant has the burden of demonstrating plain error by showing “(1) that the error was plain, i.e., evident, obvious, and clear; (2) that a failure to correct the error would produce a manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice; and (8) that the error was outcome determinative.” State v. Moore, 252 S.W.3d 272, 275 (Mo.App.2008) (internal citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Coopergreen1 sentence2010As a general rule, instructional error seldom rises to the level of plain error unless the trial court “misdirected or failed to instruct the jury such that the error affected the jury’s verdict, resulting in manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice.” State v. Beck, 167 S.W.3d 767, 778 (Mo.App.2005); State v. Cooper, 215 S.W.3d 123, 125 (Mo. banc 2007). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Marshallgreen1 sentence2010State v. Marshall, 302 S.W.3d 720, 725 (Mo.App.2010). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Beckgreen1 sentence2010As a general rule, instructional error seldom rises to the level of plain error unless the trial court “misdirected or failed to instruct the jury such that the error affected the jury’s verdict, resulting in manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice.” State v. Beck, 167 S.W.3d 767, 778 (Mo.App.2005); State v. Cooper, 215 S.W.3d 123, 125 (Mo. banc 2007). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kalagiangreen1 sentence2005State v. Kalagian, 833 S.W.2d 431, 434 (Mo.App.E.D.1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dunkins v. Jones
green
2 sentences2000State v. Hornbuckle,. 769 S.W.2d 89, 92-93 (Mo. *681 banc 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 860 , 110 S.Ct. 171 , 107 L.Ed.2d 128 (1989). 1997State v. Hornbuckle, 769 S.W.2d [89] at 92-93 [Mo. banc, cert. denied, 493 U.S. 860 , 110 S.Ct. 171 , 107 L.Ed.2d 128 (1989) ]. | 2 | 1997–2000 |
Hopkins v. Kentucky Parole Board
green
2 sentences2000State v. Hornbuckle,. 769 S.W.2d 89, 92-93 (Mo. *681 banc 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 860 , 110 S.Ct. 171 , 107 L.Ed.2d 128 (1989). 1997State v. Hornbuckle, 769 S.W.2d [89] at 92-93 [Mo. banc, cert. denied, 493 U.S. 860 , 110 S.Ct. 171 , 107 L.Ed.2d 128 (1989) ]. | 2 | 1997–2000 |
State v. Roper
green
1 sentence2021Id. at 900 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Jamison
green
2 sentences2007The party seeking plain error review “bears the burden of demonstrating plain error resulting in manifest injustice.” Id. 2007Under plain error review, we will reverse only “where the alleged error so substantially affects the rights of the accused that a manifest injustice or miscarriage of justice would inexorably result if left uncorrected.” Id. *33 In support of his first point on appeal, Young claims that the court erred in not allowing counsel to cross-examine Horace about his PCP use the night of the shooting. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Franklin
green
1 sentence2006Id. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.