Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jose Batista-Salvagreen2 sentences2025Batista-Salva, 171 N.H. at 824 . [¶19] “The purpose of the trial court’s charge is to state and explain to the jury, in clear and intelligible language, the rules of law applicable to the case.” State v. Etienne, 163 N.H. 57, 70 (2011) (quotation omitted). 2024State v. Batista-Salva, 171 N.H. 818, 824 (2019). | 2 | 3 |
State v. Jeremy M. Fiskegreen2 sentences2020State v. Fiske, 170 N.H. 279, 291 (2017). 2019State v. Fiske , 170 N.H. 279 , 291, 171 A.3d 1234 (2017). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Etiennegreen1 sentence2025Batista-Salva, 171 N.H. at 824 . [¶19] “The purpose of the trial court’s charge is to state and explain to the jury, in clear and intelligible language, the rules of law applicable to the case.” State v. Etienne, 163 N.H. 57, 70 (2011) (quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State of New Hampshire v. Adam Muellergreen1 sentence2025State v. Mueller, 166 N.H. 65, 70 (2014). [¶11] Here, even if we assume that the trial court erred, and its error was plain, we conclude that any such error fails to satisfy the third factor of the test. | 1 | 1 |
State of New Hampshire v. Vincent Coopergreen2 sentences2017See State v. Cooper , 168 N.H. 161 , 168, 125 A.3d 729 (2015). 2017See State v. Cooper , 168 N.H. 161 , 168, 125 A.3d 729 (2015). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.