9 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mims v. Mimsgreen2 sentences1985Id. *153 Various judicial presumptions have developed affecting the entireties estate, Porter, supra, at 1000, notably the gift presumption made applicable to both spouses in Mims v. Mims, 305 N.C. 41 , 286 S.E. 2d 779 (1982). 1985Id. *153 Various judicial presumptions have developed affecting the entireties estate, Porter, supra, at 1000, notably the gift presumption made applicable to both spouses in Mims v. Mims, 305 N.C. 41 , 286 S.E. 2d 779 (1982). | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Burnett v. Burnett
green
2 sentences2020Under the gift analysis discussed in Burnett v. Burnett, 122 N.C. 2020Under the gift analysis discussed in Burnett v. Burnett, 122 N.C. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
McLean v. McLean
green
2 sentences2011“Whether defendant succeeded in rebutting the presumption of gift to the marital estate by clear, cogent and convincing evidence is a matter left to the trial court’s discretion.” McLean v. McLean, 88 N.C. 1990"Whether defendant succeeded in rebutting the presumption of gift to the marital estate by clear, cogent and convincing evidence is a matter left to the trial court's discretion." McLean v. McLean, 88 N.C. | 2 | 1990–2011 |
Walter v. Walter
green
1 sentence2003App. 723 , 561 S.E.2d 571 (2002), plaintiff argues that, by moving the house to the Waccamaw Shores lot titled to both plaintiff and defendant as tenants by the entireties, defendant made a gift to the marital estate, and that it was defendant’s burden to overcome this gift presumption. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
McLean v. McLean
green
2 sentences1990Id. at 552 , 374 S.E.2d at 382 . 1990Id. at 552 , 374 S.E.2d at 382 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Loeb v. Loeb
green
1 sentence1985The marital gift presumption follows naturally from this Court’s previous decisions in Loeb, 72 N.C. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Sawyer v. Sawyer
green
1 sentence1985Id. *153 Various judicial presumptions have developed affecting the entireties estate, Porter, supra, at 1000, notably the gift presumption made applicable to both spouses in Mims v. Mims, 305 N.C. 41 , 286 S.E. 2d 779 (1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.