testimony adduced waiver in New Jersey

9 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1952–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
State in Interest of ABgreen nj · 1988 · cited in 2 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995 2 sentences 1995As the Court concluded, Although the testimony adduced at the waiver hearing revealed that A.B. suffers both from a minimal brain dysfunction and from a low intelligence quotient which places him in a borderline category of intellectual functioning, we are satisfied that the record before the Family Part did not warrant a finding of functional impairment in the statutory sense of a “developmental disability.” [ A.B., supra, 109 N.J. at 197 , 536 A.2d 240 (citation omitted).] In this ease, although there is some evidence suggesting that R.M. functions in the mildly retarded range and may suffer 1995As the Court concluded, Although the testimony adduced at the waiver hearing revealed that A.B. suffers both from a minimal brain dysfunction and from a low intelligence quotient which places him in a borderline category of intellectual functioning, we are satisfied that the record before the Family Part did not warrant a finding of functional impairment in the statutory sense of a “developmental disability.” [ A.B., supra, 109 N.J. at 197 , 536 A.2d 240 (citation omitted).] In this ease, although there is some evidence suggesting that R.M. functions in the mildly retarded range and may suffer	1	2
Padilla v. Kentuckygreen scotus · 2010 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022 1 sentence 2022See Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 369 (2010).	1	1
Richardson v. POLICE & F. RET. SYS.green nj · 2007 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021 2 sentences 2021Citing our Supreme Court's decisions in Patterson v. Board of Trustees, State Police Retirement System, 194 N.J. 29 (2008), and Richardson v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System, 192 N.J. 189 (2007), the ALJ correctly recognized in this matter that A-2754-19 4 Ortiz must first demonstrate he experienced a "traumatic event," see Patterson, 194 N.J. at 34 , and then establish that the event was "undesigned and unexpected," see Richardson, 192 N.J. at 212. 2021Citing our Supreme Court's decisions in Patterson v. Board of Trustees, State Police Retirement System, 194 N.J. 29 (2008), and Richardson v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System, 192 N.J. 189 (2007), the ALJ correctly recognized in this matter that A-2754-19 4 Ortiz must first demonstrate he experienced a "traumatic event," see Patterson, 194 N.J. at 34 , and then establish that the event was "undesigned and unexpected," see Richardson, 192 N.J. at 212.	1	1
Hornauer v. Div. of Alcoholic Beverage Controlgreen njsuperctappdiv · 1956 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977 1 sentence 1977Hornauer v. Div. of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 40 N.J.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

Case	Cited	Years
TL v. DDD, Dept. of Human Serv. green njsuperctappdiv · 1990 2 sentences 1995Cf. T.L. v. Division of Developmental Disabilities, 243 N.J. 1995Cf. T.L. v. Division of Developmental Disabilities, 243 N.J.Super. 476, 478-87 , 58 A.2d 272 (App.Div.1990) (reversing in civil administrative proceedings determination of DDD that juvenile was not developmentally disabled and eligible for services and emphasizing quality and extent of expert testimony and evidence demonstrating that juvenile was substantially functionally limited, especially evidence of results of Critical Adaptive Behaviors Inventory (CABI), “the standard DDD test for determining an applicant’s level of functioning”; noting also that evidence was tailored to statutory criter	2	1995–1995
City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc. green scotus · 1985 2 sentences 1988The Family Part characterized A.B. and his accomplices in the crime as "mature, street-wise individuals that knew exactly what they had planned and where they were going * * ." Although the testimony adduced at the waiver hearing revealed that A.B. suffers both from a minimal brain dysfunction and from a low intelligence quotient which places him in a borderline category of intellectual functioning, see City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432 , 442 n. 9, 105 S.Ct. 3249 , 3256 n. 9, 87 L.Ed. 2d 313 , 322 n. 9 (1985) (discussing four categories of mental retardation), we 1988The Family Part characterized A.B. and his accomplices in the crime as "mature, street-wise individuals that knew exactly what they had planned and where they were going * *." Although the testimony adduced at the waiver hearing revealed that A.B. suffers both from a minimal brain dysfunction and from a low intelligence quotient which places him in a borderline category of intellectual functioning, see City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc., 473 U.S. 432 , 442 n. 9, 105 S.Ct. 3249 , 3256 n. 9, 87 L.Ed. 2d 313 , 322 n. 9 (1985) (discussing four categories of mental retardation), we	2	1988–1988
Dept. of Children, Dyfs v. Ka green njsuperctappdiv · 2010 1 sentence 2025The judge credited the testimony of all witnesses, noting defendant "acknowledged facts that were not in his favor" but "answered questions in a reasonable manner" and "[h]is testimony was relatively consistent with his prior statements." Turning to the circumstances underpinning the present incident, Judge Grimbergen was persuaded they differed from the facts in New Jersey Division of Child Protection & Permanency v. K.A., 413 N.J.	1	2025–2025
Patterson v. Board of Trustees, State Police Retirement System green nj · 2008 2 sentences 2021Citing our Supreme Court's decisions in Patterson v. Board of Trustees, State Police Retirement System, 194 N.J. 29 (2008), and Richardson v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System, 192 N.J. 189 (2007), the ALJ correctly recognized in this matter that A-2754-19 4 Ortiz must first demonstrate he experienced a "traumatic event," see Patterson, 194 N.J. at 34 , and then establish that the event was "undesigned and unexpected," see Richardson, 192 N.J. at 212. 2021Citing our Supreme Court's decisions in Patterson v. Board of Trustees, State Police Retirement System, 194 N.J. 29 (2008), and Richardson v. Board of Trustees, Police & Firemen's Retirement System, 192 N.J. 189 (2007), the ALJ correctly recognized in this matter that A-2754-19 4 Ortiz must first demonstrate he experienced a "traumatic event," see Patterson, 194 N.J. at 34 , and then establish that the event was "undesigned and unexpected," see Richardson, 192 N.J. at 212.	1	2021–2021
Turney v. Avery neutral njch · 1921 1 sentence 1952Procreation of children has been described as "the most important object of matrimony" ( Turney v. Avery, 92 N.J.	1	1952–1952

Where else courts name it

NY 193 (1930–2025) TX 19 (1941–2015) NJ 9 (1952–2025) LA 7 (1937–2024) GA 7 (1951–2002) PA 7 (1949–2017) IL 4 (1973–2016) OH 4 (2004–2012) FL 3 (1974–2015) AZ 3 (1966–2007) MO 2 (1976–2023) CT 2 (2002–2004) IN 2 (1980–2018) AR 2 (1911–1975) NC 2 (1951–1962)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check