9 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1984–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Shortgreen2 sentences2010See Short, supra, 131 N.J. at 62 , 618 A.2d 316 . 2010See Short, supra, 131 N.J. at 62 , 618 A.2d 316 . | 2 | 2 |
Baumann v. Marinarogreen2 sentences2024The countervailing state policy urged by plaintiff is what the Supreme Court referred to as "the strong interests in finality of judgments and judicial efficiency." Baumann, 95 N.J. at 392 ; see also [Mancini v. EDS ex rel. 2020The judge applied subsection (f) of Rule 4:50-1, the so-called catchall provision, which permits relief in "exceptional situations." US Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Guillaume, 209 N.J. 449, 484 (2012); Baumann v. Marinaro, 95 N.J. 380, 395 (1984). | 1 | 2 |
US Bank National Ass'n v. Guillaumegreen1 sentence2020The judge applied subsection (f) of Rule 4:50-1, the so-called catchall provision, which permits relief in "exceptional situations." US Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Guillaume, 209 N.J. 449, 484 (2012); Baumann v. Marinaro, 95 N.J. 380, 395 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Mancini v. EDS ON BEHALF OF THE NEW JERSEY AUTOMOBILE FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATIONgreen1 sentence2020The countervailing state policy urged by plaintiff is what the Supreme Court referred to as "the strong interests in finality of judgments and judicial efficiency." Baumann, 95 N.J. at 392 ; see also Mancini, 132 N.J. at 334 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
University Cottage Club v. Princeton Borough
green
2 sentences2025Id. at 189 . 2025Id. at 189 . | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Apgar v. Lederle Laboratories
green
2 sentences2000Thus, for example, in Apgar v. Lederle Lab., 123 N.J. 450, 455 , 588 A.2d 380 (1991), the Court held time-barred the claim of one who knew that her teeth had been discolored and, based on information from several dentists (reasonable medical support), surmised that the medication that she had taken as a child had caused the staining. 2000Thus, for example, in Apgar v. Lederle Lab., 123 N.J. 450, 455 , 588 A.2d 380 (1991), the Court held time-barred the claim of one who knew that her teeth had been discolored and, based on information from several dentists (reasonable medical support), surmised that the medication that she had taken as a child had caused the staining. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Stone v. White
green
2 sentences1988In the second case, Stone v. White, 301 U.S. 532 , 57 S.Ct. 851 , 81 L.Ed. 1265 (1937), the government asserted equitable recoupment on a time-barred claim in a suit by trustees to recover on income taxes incorrectly paid on the income of the trust. 1988In the second case, Stone v. White, 301 U.S. 532 , 57 S.Ct. 851 , 81 L.Ed. 1265 (1937), the government asserted equitable recoupment on a time-barred claim in a suit by trustees to recover on income taxes incorrectly paid on the income of the trust. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Berman v. Allan
green
2 sentences1984At one time Mr. and Mrs. Procanik had independent claims for their emotional distress, Berman v. Allan, supra, 80 N.J. 421 and for the extraordinary medical expenses arising from Peter's multiple birth defects. 1984At one time Mr. and Mrs. Procanik had independent claims for their emotional distress, Berman v. Allan, supra, 80 N.J. 421 and for the extraordinary medical expenses arising from Peter's multiple birth defects. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.