valuable privilege (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

valuable privilege in Pennsylvania

9 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1930–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Telang v. COM., BUREAU OF PROF. & OCC. AFFAIRSgreen
pa · 2000 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2018–2023
2 sentences

2023It is a bedrock principle that once a professional license is acquired, it becomes “a valuable privilege or right in the nature of property,” Shah v. State Board of Medicine, . . . 589 A.2d 783, 787 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1991), and “[t]here is little doubt that [the p]etitioner has a substantial interest to be protected.” Bhattacharjee v. Department of State, [State Board of Medicine], 808 A.2d 280, 283 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002); see Telang[v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs], 751 A.2d 1147 [,] 1150 [Pa. 2000)].

2018It is a bedrock principle that once a professional license is acquired, it becomes "a valuable privilege or right in the nature of property," Shah v. State Board of Medicine , 139 Pa.Cmwlth. 94 , 589 A.2d 783 , 787 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1991), and "[t]here is little doubt that Petitioner has a substantial interest to be protected." Bhattacharjee v. Department of State , 808 A.2d 280 , 283 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002) ; see Telang , 751 A.2d at 1150 .

22
Man O' War Racing Ass'n v. State Horse Racing Commissiongreen
pa · 1969 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1975–2010
2 sentences

2010See Man O’ War Racing Ass’n v. State Horse Racing Comm’n, 433 Pa. 432 , 250 A.2d 172 (1969) (a horse racing license is a valuable privilege for which an applicant expends large sums of money; thus an unsuccessful applicant has standing to challenge the granting of licenses to others).

2010See Man O’ War Racing Ass’n v. State Horse Racing Comm’n, 433 Pa. 432 , 250 A.2d 172 (1969) (a horse racing license is a valuable privilege for which an applicant expends large sums of money; thus an unsuccessful applicant has standing to challenge the granting of licenses to others).

22
Shah v. State Board of Medicinegreen
pacommwct · 1991 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2018–2023
2 sentences

2023It is a bedrock principle that once a professional license is acquired, it becomes “a valuable privilege or right in the nature of property,” Shah v. State Board of Medicine, . . . 589 A.2d 783, 787 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1991), and “[t]here is little doubt that [the p]etitioner has a substantial interest to be protected.” Bhattacharjee v. Department of State, [State Board of Medicine], 808 A.2d 280, 283 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002); see Telang[v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs], 751 A.2d 1147 [,] 1150 [Pa. 2000)].

2018It is a bedrock principle that once a professional license is acquired, it becomes "a valuable privilege or right in the nature of property," Shah v. State Board of Medicine , 139 Pa.Cmwlth. 94 , 589 A.2d 783 , 787 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1991), and "[t]here is little doubt that Petitioner has a substantial interest to be protected." Bhattacharjee v. Department of State , 808 A.2d 280 , 283 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002) ; see Telang , 751 A.2d at 1150 .

12
Bhattacharjee v. Department of Stategreen
pacommwct · 2002 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2018–2023
2 sentences

2023It is a bedrock principle that once a professional license is acquired, it becomes “a valuable privilege or right in the nature of property,” Shah v. State Board of Medicine, . . . 589 A.2d 783, 787 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1991), and “[t]here is little doubt that [the p]etitioner has a substantial interest to be protected.” Bhattacharjee v. Department of State, [State Board of Medicine], 808 A.2d 280, 283 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002); see Telang[v. Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs], 751 A.2d 1147 [,] 1150 [Pa. 2000)].

2018It is a bedrock principle that once a professional license is acquired, it becomes "a valuable privilege or right in the nature of property," Shah v. State Board of Medicine , 139 Pa.Cmwlth. 94 , 589 A.2d 783 , 787 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1991), and "[t]here is little doubt that Petitioner has a substantial interest to be protected." Bhattacharjee v. Department of State , 808 A.2d 280 , 283 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002) ; see Telang , 751 A.2d at 1150 .

12
St. Elizabeth's Child Care Center v. Department of Public Welfaregreen
pacommwct · 2010 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011However, we adopt the reasoning in Moore that a license, such as that conferred in an agent service agreement, is a valuable privilege which may not be suspended or revoked without due process. 989 A.2d at 52.

2011Section 702 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa. C.S. § 702, provides that “[a]ny person aggrieved by an adjudication of a Commonwealth agency who has a direct interest in such adjudication shall have the right to appeal therefrom to the Court vested with jurisdiction of such appeals.” Therefore, as was stated in Moore, “[b]e-cause the Administrative Agency Law is the default procedure for dealing with appeals, the elimination of the specific appeal contained in Section 7503 did not eliminate the right to appeal, it just placed the procedure for appeal within the Administrative Agency Law.”

11
Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Greenville Business Men's Ass'ngreen
pa · 1966 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993See also, Employers Liability Assurance Corporation v. Greenville Business Men's Association, 423 Pa. 288 , 224 A.2d 620 .

1993See also, Employers Liability Assurance Corporation v. Greenville Business Men's Association, 423 Pa. 288 , 224 A.2d 620 .

11
Dickinson v. United Statesgreen
ca1 · 1908 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1981–1981
1 sentence

1981On the contrary, it uniformly was regarded as a valuable privilege bestowed upon the person accused of crime for the purpose of safeguarding him against the oppressive power of the King and the arbitrary or partial judgment of the court.” Patton v. United States, 281 U.S. 276, 295-97 , 50 S.Ct. 253, 257 , 74 L.Ed. 854 (1930), quoting with approval Dickinson v. United States, 159 F. 801, 820 (1st Cir. 1908) (dissenting opinion of Aldrich, J.).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co. green
pa · 1991
2 sentences

1993We can discern no reason to abandon the Perry rule of contract interpretation which is still a valuable rule of construction, rooted in reason and authority and reject Butler Petroleum's contrary arguments. *478 Ruzzi, 527 Pa. at 9 , 588 A.2d at 5 .

1993We can discern no reason to abandon the Perry rule of contract interpretation which is still a valuable rule of construction, rooted in reason and authority and reject Butler Petroleum's contrary arguments. *478 Ruzzi, 527 Pa. at 9 , 588 A.2d at 5 .

11993–1993
Patton v. United States red
scotus · 1930
2 sentences

1981On the contrary, it uniformly was regarded as a valuable privilege bestowed upon the person accused of crime for the purpose of safeguarding him against the oppressive power of the King and the arbitrary or partial judgment of the court.” Patton v. United States, 281 U.S. 276, 295-97 , 50 S.Ct. 253, 257 , 74 L.Ed. 854 (1930), quoting with approval Dickinson v. United States, 159 F. 801, 820 (1st Cir. 1908) (dissenting opinion of Aldrich, J.).

1981On the contrary, it uniformly was regarded as a valuable privilege bestowed upon the person accused of crime for the purpose of safeguarding him against the oppressive power of the King and the arbitrary or partial judgment of the court.” Patton v. United States, 281 U.S. 276, 295-97 , 50 S.Ct. 253, 257 , 74 L.Ed. 854 (1930), quoting with approval Dickinson v. United States, 159 F. 801, 820 (1st Cir. 1908) (dissenting opinion of Aldrich, J.).

11981–1981
Tioga County v. South Creek Township green
pa · 1874
1 sentence

1956However, it held that such a result was not in the legislative mind, and that the act “was not intended to abolish a valuable rule of law founded in good morals and public decency”: Tioga County v. South Creek Township, 75 Pa. 433 .

11956–1956
Sinclair v. United States green
scotus · 1929
1 sentence

1930Section 5 requires that “the names, occupations, addresses and numbers of persons so drawn for jury service shall be typewritten upon a list, and the list shall be posted in the office of the prothonotary and clerk of the court at least twenty-five days before the first day of the week of court for which said jurors are chosen......” By consulting such list any party to litigation may inform himself prior to trial of the personnel of the panel from which the jurors for his suit may be drawn; this opportunity *99 to be informed is a valuable privilege (Mosohzisker,: Trial by Jury, 2 Ed., sec. 1

11930–1930
Williams v. Commonwealth green
pa · 1880
1 sentence

1930Section 5 requires that “the names, occupations, addresses and numbers of persons so drawn for jury service shall be typewritten upon a list, and the list shall be posted in the office of the prothonotary and clerk of the court at least twenty-five days before the first day of the week of court for which said jurors are chosen......” By consulting such list any party to litigation may inform himself prior to trial of the personnel of the panel from which the jurors for his suit may be drawn; this opportunity *99 to be informed is a valuable privilege (Mosohzisker,: Trial by Jury, 2 Ed., sec. 1

11930–1930

Where else courts name it

TN 199 (1976–2026) CA 11 (1914–2022) IL 11 (1890–2023) NY 10 (1849–2020) PA 9 (1930–2023) CT 7 (1920–2006) TX 7 (1897–1988) MI 4 (1956–2017) MD 3 (1920–1995) WV 3 (1959–2024) FL 3 (1989–2001) MA 3 (1982–2003) WA 3 (1992–2020) OH 3 (1916–1954) AR 2 (1946–2008) DE 2 (1931–1981) MO 2 (1976–1987) SC 2 (1938–2014) HI 2 (1960–2016) WI 2 (1913–1955) NJ 2 (1952–1958)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check