veracity claim (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

veracity claim in Pennsylvania

9 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1981–2022 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Crosby Square Apartments v. Hensongreen
pasuperct · 1995 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2002–2022
2 sentences

2022Moreover, Tedesco maintains that the “trial court [was] required to hold an evidentiary [hearing] to determine the veracity of the claim of inability to pay the costs of litigation[.]” Id. (citing Crosby Square Apartments v. Henson, 666 A.2d 737, 738-39 (Pa. Super. 1995)).9 Tedesco also requests transfer of his claims to the Pennsylvania Superior Court.

2022Id.

22
Amrhein v. Amrheingreen
pasuperct · 2006 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Amrhein, 903 A.2d at 23-24 (some internal citations and quotations omitted) (emphasis added). -8- J-S17016-22 Here, the court assessed the credibility of Father’s allegations that he was unable to afford the costs of his appeal without holding a hearing.

11
In Re the Adoption of B.G.S.green
pasuperct · 1992 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002Crosby Square Apartments v. Henson, 446 Pa.Super. 286 , 666 A.2d 737, 738-39 (1995); In re: Adoption of B.G.S., 418 Pa.Super. 588 , 614 A.2d 1161, 1171 (1992). ¶ 13 There is nothing in the entire certified record indicating that a hearing was ever held in any of the three cases.

2002Crosby Square Apartments v. Henson, 446 Pa.Super. 286 , 666 A.2d 737, 738-39 (1995); In re: Adoption of B.G.S., 418 Pa.Super. 588 , 614 A.2d 1161, 1171 (1992). ¶ 13 There is nothing in the entire certified record indicating that a hearing was ever held in any of the three cases.

11
Commonwealth v. Longgreen
pasuperct · 1978 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1981–1981
2 sentences

1981In Commonwealth v. Long, 258 Pa.Super. 312 , 392 A.2d 810 (1978), the prosecutor implied that defense counsel was under no duty to operate under the truth and described defense counsel as a “not guilty machine.” He questioned the veracity of a defense witness, stating, “I doubt very seriously whether or not this incident occurred.” Finally, he asked the jury to “[tjhink about the larger issue here ... the fact that any male or female of any size, shape or color can ride the subway at 4:00 a. m. or 4:00 p. m. if they like in safety without fear.” We note that in Long , Judge Cercone concluded t

1981In Commonwealth v. Long, 258 Pa.Super. 312 , 392 A.2d 810 (1978), the prosecutor implied that defense counsel was under no duty to operate under the truth and described defense counsel as a “not guilty machine.” He questioned the veracity of a defense witness, stating, “I doubt very seriously whether or not this incident occurred.” Finally, he asked the jury to “[tjhink about the larger issue here ... the fact that any male or female of any size, shape or color can ride the subway at 4:00 a. m. or 4:00 p. m. if they like in safety without fear.” We note that in Long , Judge Cercone concluded t

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Goldstein v. Haband Co. green
pasuperct · 2002
2 sentences

2022In Goldstein v. Haband Company, Inc., [ 814 A.2d 1214 (Pa. Super. 2002),] we reiterated that a trial court’s disbelief of averments in an IFP application requires the court to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine the veracity of the claim of the inability to pay costs.

2006In Goldstein v. Haband Company, Inc., supra, we reiterated that a trial court’s disbelief of averments in an IFP application requires the court to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine the veracity of the claim of the inability to pay costs. ¶ 24 In the instant case, the trial court stated that it accepted the income aver-ments, but it failed to assess the balance of the averments, instead determining eligibility based upon Mother’s income as defined in the NLSA Guidelines.

22006–2022
Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc. green
pa · 1987
2 sentences

1996Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, 515 Pa. 183 , 527 A.2d 988 (1987).

1996Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, 515 Pa. 183 , 527 A.2d 988 (1987).

21993–1996
KRYSMALSKI BY KRYSMALSKI v. Tarasovich green
pasuperct · 1993
1 sentence

1996In other words, the witnessing of an “injury to a close relative, the contemporaneous observance and close relationship guarantee the veracity of the claim.” See Krysmalski, supra, at 135, 622 A.2d at 305 .

11996–1996
Franks v. Delaware green
scotus · 1978
2 sentences

1982That decision, however, set forth only the minimal constitutional standard regarding the allowance of veracity challenges and fully recognized that “. . . the framing of suitable rules to govern proffers [of defendants concerning the untruthfulness of warrant affidavits] is a matter properly left to the States.” 438 U.S. at 172 , 98 S.Ct. at 2685 , 57 L.Ed.2d at 682 .

1982That decision, however, set forth only the minimal constitutional standard regarding the allowance of veracity challenges and fully recognized that “. . . the framing of suitable rules to govern proffers [of defendants concerning the untruthfulness of warrant affidavits] is a matter properly left to the States.” 438 U.S. at 172 , 98 S.Ct. at 2685 , 57 L.Ed.2d at 682 .

11982–1982
Commonwealth v. Chatman green
pasuperct · 1980
2 sentences

1982Commonwealth v. Chatman, supra 275 Pa.Super. at 10-11 , 418 A.2d at 585 . *204 In conclusion, the appellant does not dispute that the affidavit adequately met the first-prong of Aguilar , the basis of knowledge prong, and we determine there was a sufficient basis—quite ever so barely—for the second-prong, the veracity test.

1982Commonwealth v. Chatman, supra 275 Pa.Super. at 10-11 , 418 A.2d at 585 . *204 In conclusion, the appellant does not dispute that the affidavit adequately met the first-prong of Aguilar , the basis of knowledge prong, and we determine there was a sufficient basis—quite ever so barely—for the second-prong, the veracity test.

11982–1982

Where else courts name it

MA 74 (1985–2026) IL 20 (1967–2024) CO 14 (1982–2021) NY 12 (1977–2026) CA 10 (1971–2025) PA 9 (1981–2022) NJ 7 (1987–2024) MI 7 (2017–2022) IA 5 (1982–2025) WA 4 (1988–2015) OK 4 (1995–2009) AL 4 (1977–1980) OH 3 (2007–2024) FL 3 (1977–2001) MS 3 (1975–2014) DC 2 (1982–1989) WI 2 (1988–1997) NM 2 (1977–2014) MN 2 (2006–2025) MD 2 (1977–1982)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check