7 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Novembrinogreen2 sentences2017Our Supreme Court has "in the past accepted a similarly undetailed endorsement of an informant as satisfying the veracity requirement." State v. Novembrino, 105 N.J. 95, 123 (1987) (citation omitted). 1998See Novembrino, supra, 105 N.J. at 116 , 519 A.2d 820 (noting that police corroboration of innocent detaüs could not satisfy the veracity requirement). *113 Under the totality of the circumstances test, the several circumstances, though insufficient if considered in isolation, may in combination reinforce or augment one another and become sufficient to demonstrate probable cause. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2017The informant's basis of knowledge was not revealed; it can be established, however, not only by "direct evidence of the manner in which the informant learned of the criminal activity" but, also, "by a prediction of hard-to-know future events." State v. Williams, 364 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Stanley v. Stategreen2 sentences1987State v. Perry, supra, 59 N.J. at 390 ; compare Stanley v. State, 19 Md.App. 507, 512-13 , 313 A.2d 847, 851 (1974) (where informant satisfied Aguilar’s veraci ty prong with “flying colors.”). 1987State v. Perry, supra, 59 N.J. at 390 ; compare Stanley v. State, 19 Md.App. 507, 512-13 , 313 A.2d 847, 851 (1974) (where informant satisfied Aguilar’s veraci ty prong with “flying colors.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cummings
green
2 sentences2024But we decline to hinge a finding of a per se conflict and constitutional violation upon such a "bald assertion." See Cummings, 321 N.J. 2024But we decline to hinge a finding of a per se conflict and constitutional violation upon such a "bald assertion." See Cummings, 321 N.J. | 2 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Broom-Smith
green
2 sentences2018Therefore, a defendant's veracity challenge should not be focused on "picking apart minor technical problems with a warrant application;" rather, it should address "warrants obtained through intentional wrongdoing by law enforcement agents[.]" Broom-Smith, 406 N.J. 2017Therefore, a defendant's veracity challenge should not be focused on "picking apart minor technical problems with a warrant application;" rather, it should address "warrants obtained through intentional wrongdoing by law enforcement agents[.]" Broom-Smith, supra, 406 N.J. | 2 | 2017–2018 |
Illinois v. Gates
green
2 sentences1998Gates, supra, 462 U.S. at 233 , 103 S.Ct. at 2329 , 76 L. 1998Gates, supra, 462 U.S. at 233 , 103 S.Ct. at 2329 , 76 L. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Perry
green
2 sentences1987State v. Perry, supra, 59 N.J. at 390 ; compare Stanley v. State, 19 Md.App. 507, 512-13 , 313 A.2d 847, 851 (1974) (where informant satisfied Aguilar’s veraci ty prong with “flying colors.”). 1987State v. Perry, supra, 59 N.J. at 390 ; compare Stanley v. State, 19 Md. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.