9 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Briggsgreen1 sentence2022See Briggs, 756 A.2d at 736 ; Terzian, 162 A.3d at 1238 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kendall Whitakergreen1 sentence2016See State v. Whitaker, 79 A.3d 795, 806 (R.I.2013) (objections to a jury charge' that are raised for the first time on appeal are deemed to be waived). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Justin Proutgreen1 sentence2016See Rrout, 116 A.3d at 204 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Robert Rasogreen1 sentence2015See Raso, 80 A.3d at 44 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Christodalgreen1 sentence2012In assessing the magistrate’s original sentencing intent, the hearing justice, citing State v. Christodal, 946 A.2d 811, 815 (R.I.2008), 14 acknowledged that the magis trate may have considered several relevant factors, such as Bouffard’s previous contacts with law enforcement, his record of conviction for other offenses, and the number of times that he had appeared before the Superior Court as a violator. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wrightgreen1 sentence2005See Wright, 817 A.2d at 610 (holding that the defendant had “failed to make an offer of proof and failed to introduce any evidence tending to show that * * * [the alleged third-party perpetrator] could have committed the murder”); State v. Brennan, 526 A.2d 483, 488 (R.I.1987) (holding that *112 the defendant “failed to make an offer of proof or to introduce any evidence tending to show that * * * [the alleged third-party perpetrator] could have committed the murder”); Gazerro, 420 A.2d at 825 (“[T]he offer of proof shows that defendants would have introduced absolutely no evidence placing * * | 1 | 1 |
State v. Gazerrogreen1 sentence2005See Wright, 817 A.2d at 610 (holding that the defendant had “failed to make an offer of proof and failed to introduce any evidence tending to show that * * * [the alleged third-party perpetrator] could have committed the murder”); State v. Brennan, 526 A.2d 483, 488 (R.I.1987) (holding that *112 the defendant “failed to make an offer of proof or to introduce any evidence tending to show that * * * [the alleged third-party perpetrator] could have committed the murder”); Gazerro, 420 A.2d at 825 (“[T]he offer of proof shows that defendants would have introduced absolutely no evidence placing * * | 1 | 1 |
State v. Brennangreen1 sentence2005See Wright, 817 A.2d at 610 (holding that the defendant had “failed to make an offer of proof and failed to introduce any evidence tending to show that * * * [the alleged third-party perpetrator] could have committed the murder”); State v. Brennan, 526 A.2d 483, 488 (R.I.1987) (holding that *112 the defendant “failed to make an offer of proof or to introduce any evidence tending to show that * * * [the alleged third-party perpetrator] could have committed the murder”); Gazerro, 420 A.2d at 825 (“[T]he offer of proof shows that defendants would have introduced absolutely no evidence placing * * | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bettencourtgreen1 sentence2002See State v. Bettencourt, 766 A.2d 391, 393 (R.I.2001) (per curiam). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Boghos Terzian
green
1 sentence2022See Briggs, 756 A.2d at 736 ; Terzian, 162 A.3d at 1238 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Feng
green
2 sentences2017This Court will “not vacate a plea unless the record viewed in its totality discloses no facts that could have satisfied the [hearing] justice that a factual basis existed for a defendant’s plea.” Id. at 935-36 (quoting Feng, 421 A.2d at 1269 ). *435 Our review of the record reveals that the hearing justice found that the Superior Court engaged in a detailed colloquy with Njie before determining that his plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. 2017This Court will “not vacate a plea unless the record viewed in its totality discloses no facts that could have satisfied the [hearing] justice that a factual basis existed for a defendant’s plea.” Id. at 935-36 (quoting Feng, 421 A.2d at 1269 ). *435 Our review of the record reveals that the hearing justice found that the Superior Court engaged in a detailed colloquy with Njie before determining that his plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Toole v. State
green
1 sentence2013Therefore, it is our firm opinion that all of the procedural requirements of Shatney were followed and that the hearing justice made no error when he granted counsel’s motion to withdraw. 2 B Denial and Dismissal of Application for Postconviction Relief Perez also argues that he was not afforded an opportunity to reply to the hearing justice’s proposed dismissal of his application, as required by § 10-9.1-6(b) and Toole v. State, 713 A.2d 1264 (R.I.1998). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.