record reveals defense in Washington

2017"Whether a motion for continuance should be granted or denied is a matter of discretion with the trial court, reviewable on appeal for manifest abuse of discretion." Trummel v. Mitchell, 156 Wn.2d 653, 670 , 131 P.3d 305 (2006) (citing Balandzich v. Demeroto, 10 Wn.

2017"Whether a motion for continuance should be granted or denied is a matter of discretion with the trial court, reviewable on appeal for manifest abuse of discretion." Trummel v. Mitchell, 156 Wn.2d 653, 670 , 131 P.3d 305 (2006) (citing Balandzich v. Demeroto, 10 Wn.

2017"Whether a motion for continuance should be granted or denied is a matter of discretion with the trial court, reviewable on appeal for manifest abuse of discretion." Trummel v. Mitchell, 156 Wn.2d 653, 670 , 131 P.3d 305 (2006) (citing Balandzich v. Demeroto, 10 Wn.

2015In response to the State's motion to exclude any mental health defense prior to trial, defense counsel stated that he planned to "elicit some 28 State v.McFarland. 127 Wn.2d 322, 334-35 , 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). 29 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L.

2015In response to the State's motion to exclude any mental health defense prior to trial, defense counsel stated that he planned to "elicit some 28 State v.McFarland. 127 Wn.2d 322, 334-35 , 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). 29 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L.

2015In response to the State's motion to exclude any mental health defense prior to trial, defense counsel stated that he planned to "elicit some 28 State v.McFarland. 127 Wn.2d 322, 334-35 , 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). 29 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L.

2015In response to the State's motion to exclude any mental health defense prior to trial, defense counsel stated that he planned to "elicit some 28 State v.McFarland. 127 Wn.2d 322, 334-35 , 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). 29 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697 , 104 S. Ct. 2052 , 80 L.

2015A court allows withdrawal of a guilty plea if '"necessary to correct a manifest injustice,'"30 and a defendant may establish manifest injustice by 30 A.N.J.. 168 Wn.2d at 106 (quoting CrR 4.2(f)). -12- No. 70927-5-1/13 showing ineffective assistance of counsel.

2012Id. § 30:41. ¶31 Applying the deferential review appropriate to misconduct findings in civil cases, see Alcoa, 140 Wn.2d at 539 , we conclude that the record supports Judge González’s findings of misconduct. ¶32 First, the trial record reveals that defense counsel repeatedly violated the evidence rules by attempting to put exhibits before the jury that had not been admitted and to elicit testimony regarding subjects that the court had ruled inadmissible or irrelevant.

2004NOTES [1] State v. Teal, 117 Wash.App. 831, 843 , 73 P.3d 402 (2003). [2] The court accepted the State's "to convict" instruction and the record reveals that the defense proposed an identical instruction.

2004NOTES [1] State v. Teal, 117 Wash.App. 831, 843 , 73 P.3d 402 (2003). [2] The court accepted the State's "to convict" instruction and the record reveals that the defense proposed an identical instruction.

1976Examination of the record reveals the error claimed is not one of "obvious and manifest injustice," State v. Louie, 68 Wn.2d 304, 312 , 413 P.2d 7 (1966), requiring review notwithstanding a failure to raise the issue below.

1976Examination of the record reveals the error claimed is not one of "obvious and manifest injustice," State v. Louie, 68 Wn.2d 304, 312 , 413 P.2d 7 (1966), requiring review notwithstanding a failure to raise the issue below.