branch rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

branch rule in Washington

9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1928–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re the Salary of the Juvenile Directorgreen
wash · 1976 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
2 sentences

2010Carrick v. Locke, 125 Wash.2d 129, 135 , 882 P.2d 173 (1994); see Juvenile Dir., 87 Wash.2d at 241-43 , 552 P.2d 163 . ¶ 47 In the context here, the executive branch negotiates the CBAs and with respect to negotiated terms makes a direct determination of financial feasibility.

2010Carrick v. Locke, 125 Wn.2d 129, 135 , 882 P.2d 173 (1994); see Juvenile Dir., 87 Wn.2d at 241-43 . f 47 In the context here, the executive branch negotiates the CBAs and, with respect to negotiated terms, makes a direct determination of financial feasibility.

22
Boonstra v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.green
wash · 1964 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002See also Boonstra v. Stevens-Norton, Inc., 64 Wn.2d 621, 624 , 393 P.2d 287 (1964); 3 Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc., 38 Wn.2d 417, 421 , 229 P.2d 890 (1951); Jacoby v. Hollada, 78 Wash. 88, 90-91 , 138 P. 558 (1914).

2002See also Boonstra v. Stevens-Norton, Inc., 64 Wn.2d 621, 624 , 393 P.2d 287 (1964); 3 Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc., 38 Wn.2d 417, 421 , 229 P.2d 890 (1951); Jacoby v. Hollada, 78 Wash. 88, 90-91 , 138 P. 558 (1914).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

CaseCitedYears
Carrick v. Locke green
wash · 1994
2 sentences

2010Carrick v. Locke, 125 Wn.2d 129, 135 , 882 P.2d 173 (1994); see Juvenile Dir., 87 Wn.2d at 241-43 . f 47 In the context here, the executive branch negotiates the CBAs and, with respect to negotiated terms, makes a direct determination of financial feasibility.

2010Carrick v. Locke, 125 Wn.2d 129, 135 , 882 P.2d 173 (1994); see Juvenile Dir., 87 Wn.2d at 241-43 . f 47 In the context here, the executive branch negotiates the CBAs and, with respect to negotiated terms, makes a direct determination of financial feasibility.

22010–2010
Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc. green
wash · 1951
2 sentences

2002See also Boonstra v. Stevens-Norton, Inc., 64 Wn.2d 621, 624 , 393 P.2d 287 (1964); 3 Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc., 38 Wn.2d 417, 421 , 229 P.2d 890 (1951); Jacoby v. Hollada, 78 Wash. 88, 90-91 , 138 P. 558 (1914).

2002See also Boonstra v. Stevens-Norton, Inc., 64 Wn.2d 621, 624 , 393 P.2d 287 (1964); 3 Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc., 38 Wn.2d 417, 421 , 229 P.2d 890 (1951); Jacoby v. Hollada, 78 Wash. 88, 90-91 , 138 P. 558 (1914).

22002–2002
Stack v. Nolte neutral
wash · 1902
2 sentences

2002The statements which most frequently come within this branch of the rule are those concerning value. . . .” Stack v. Nolte, 29 Wash. 188, 196 , 69 P. 753 (1902) (emphasis omitted) (quoting 2 John Norton Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence, §§ 878, 879 (1886)).

2002The statements which most frequently come within this branch of the rule are those concerning value. . . .” Stack v. Nolte, 29 Wash. 188, 196 , 69 P. 753 (1902) (emphasis omitted) (quoting 2 John Norton Pomeroy, Equity Jurisprudence, §§ 878, 879 (1886)).

22002–2002
Jacoby v. Hollada neutral
wash · 1914
2 sentences

2002See also Boonstra v. Stevens-Norton, Inc., 64 Wn.2d 621, 624 , 393 P.2d 287 (1964); 3 Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc., 38 Wn.2d 417, 421 , 229 P.2d 890 (1951); Jacoby v. Hollada, 78 Wash. 88, 90-91 , 138 P. 558 (1914).

2002See also Boonstra v. Stevens-Norton, Inc., 64 Wn.2d 621, 624 , 393 P.2d 287 (1964); 3 Cunningham v. Studio Theatre, Inc., 38 Wn.2d 417, 421 , 229 P.2d 890 (1951); Jacoby v. Hollada, 78 Wash. 88, 90-91 , 138 P. 558 (1914).

22002–2002
State v. Gunderson green
wash · 2014
2 sentences

2020And S.M.’s statement that “I wanted to talk and that is not what he had in mind” does not in and of itself express that 38 Carson v. Fine, 123 Wn.2d 206, 224 , 867 P.2d 610 (1994). ~ State v. Powell, 166 Wn.2d 73, 81 , 206 P.3d 321 (2009). 40 State v. Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d 916, 922 , 337 P.3d 1090 (2014). 41 Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d at 922 . 42 RCW 26.50.1 10(1)(a)(iii). -16- No. 78379-3-I / 17 Branch was ‘sexually abusing [SM.] in the psych ward,” as Branch claims.

2020And S.M.’s statement that “I wanted to talk and that is not what he had in mind” does not in and of itself express that 38 Carson v. Fine, 123 Wn.2d 206, 224 , 867 P.2d 610 (1994). ~ State v. Powell, 166 Wn.2d 73, 81 , 206 P.3d 321 (2009). 40 State v. Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d 916, 922 , 337 P.3d 1090 (2014). 41 Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d at 922 . 42 RCW 26.50.1 10(1)(a)(iii). -16- No. 78379-3-I / 17 Branch was ‘sexually abusing [SM.] in the psych ward,” as Branch claims.

12020–2020
State v. Powell green
wash · 2009
1 sentence

2020And S.M.’s statement that “I wanted to talk and that is not what he had in mind” does not in and of itself express that 38 Carson v. Fine, 123 Wn.2d 206, 224 , 867 P.2d 610 (1994). ~ State v. Powell, 166 Wn.2d 73, 81 , 206 P.3d 321 (2009). 40 State v. Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d 916, 922 , 337 P.3d 1090 (2014). 41 Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d at 922 . 42 RCW 26.50.1 10(1)(a)(iii). -16- No. 78379-3-I / 17 Branch was ‘sexually abusing [SM.] in the psych ward,” as Branch claims.

12020–2020
Carson v. Fine green
wash · 1994
2 sentences

2020And S.M.’s statement that “I wanted to talk and that is not what he had in mind” does not in and of itself express that 38 Carson v. Fine, 123 Wn.2d 206, 224 , 867 P.2d 610 (1994). ~ State v. Powell, 166 Wn.2d 73, 81 , 206 P.3d 321 (2009). 40 State v. Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d 916, 922 , 337 P.3d 1090 (2014). 41 Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d at 922 . 42 RCW 26.50.1 10(1)(a)(iii). -16- No. 78379-3-I / 17 Branch was ‘sexually abusing [SM.] in the psych ward,” as Branch claims.

2020And S.M.’s statement that “I wanted to talk and that is not what he had in mind” does not in and of itself express that 38 Carson v. Fine, 123 Wn.2d 206, 224 , 867 P.2d 610 (1994). ~ State v. Powell, 166 Wn.2d 73, 81 , 206 P.3d 321 (2009). 40 State v. Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d 916, 922 , 337 P.3d 1090 (2014). 41 Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d at 922 . 42 RCW 26.50.1 10(1)(a)(iii). -16- No. 78379-3-I / 17 Branch was ‘sexually abusing [SM.] in the psych ward,” as Branch claims.

12020–2020
State v. Powell green
wash · 2009
1 sentence

2020And S.M.’s statement that “I wanted to talk and that is not what he had in mind” does not in and of itself express that 38 Carson v. Fine, 123 Wn.2d 206, 224 , 867 P.2d 610 (1994). ~ State v. Powell, 166 Wn.2d 73, 81 , 206 P.3d 321 (2009). 40 State v. Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d 916, 922 , 337 P.3d 1090 (2014). 41 Gunderson, 181 Wn.2d at 922 . 42 RCW 26.50.1 10(1)(a)(iii). -16- No. 78379-3-I / 17 Branch was ‘sexually abusing [SM.] in the psych ward,” as Branch claims.

12020–2020
State v. Branch green
wash · 1996
1 sentence

2013Branch, 129 Wn.2d at 643-44 .

12013–2013
Kirkpatrick v. Collins neutral
wash · 1917
2 sentences

1948In Kirkpatrick v. Collins, 95 Wash. 399 , 163 Pac. 919 , the court quoted with approval the statement of the rule as expressed in 40 Cyc. 2467, set forth above.

1948In Kirkpatrick v. Collins, 95 Wash. 399 , 163 Pac. 919 , the court quoted with approval the statement of the rule as expressed in 40 Cyc. 2467, set forth above.

11948–1948
Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. Smith green
ca8 · 1898
1 sentence

1931This contention, we think, is effectively answered by the decision of the Federal circuit court of appeals for the 8th circuit in Western Commercial Travelers’ Ass’n v. Smith, 85 Fed. 401 , which we have above noticed touching the other branch of our inquiry.

11931–1931
Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co. green
wash · 1913
2 sentences

1928Mosso v. Stanton Co., 75 Wash. 220 , 134 Pac. 941 , L.

1928Mosso v. Stanton Co., 75 Wash. 220 , 134 Pac. 941 , L.

11928–1928

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 53 (1889–2025) OH 26 (1899–2024) IL 17 (1879–1981) AL 16 (1915–2013) TX 13 (1922–2026) VT 13 (1871–2025) IN 12 (1862–2007) NY 11 (1854–2016) WA 9 (1928–2020) PA 7 (1858–2002) MS 6 (2002–2013) FL 6 (1968–2018) MT 6 (1978–1998) VA 5 (1988–2008) NC 5 (1884–1993) MO 5 (1869–1995) MI 5 (1981–1985) UT 4 (1992–2020) WV 4 (2004–2024) MA 4 (1907–2005) IA 3 (1908–2019) GA 3 (1886–1996) OR 2 (1882–1901) DC 2 (1945–2013) WI 2 (1902–1921) TN 2 (1906–1965) OK 2 (1912–1916) NJ 2 (1933–2020) NE 2 (1917–2015) AK 2 (1974–1996) AR 2 (2014–2019) CT 2 (1977–1997) SD 2 (1973–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check