9 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mishkind-Feinberg Realty Co. v. . Sidorskygreen2 sentences2017C.P.L.R. § 304 (a) ("An action is commenced by filing a summons and complaint or summons with notice."); see also Martin v. Martin, 38 Misc. 2d 836, 837 , 238 N.Y.S.2d 749 (Sup. Ct. 1963) ("The summons 'is always of prime importance,' being 'the effective paper upon which jurisdiction is founded." (quoting Mishkind-Feinberg Realty v. Sidorsky, 189 N.Y. 402, 407 , 82 N.E. 448 (1907))). -5- No. 75335-5-1/ 6 courts have used this logic in applying a similar priority rule.1° And, while no Washington court has yet applied the compulsory counterclaim rule in a priority of action analysis, we agree w 2017C.P.L.R. § 304 (a) ("An action is commenced by filing a summons and complaint or summons with notice."); see also Martin v. Martin, 38 Misc. 2d 836, 837 , 238 N.Y.S.2d 749 (Sup. Ct. 1963) ("The summons 'is always of prime importance,' being 'the effective paper upon which jurisdiction is founded." (quoting Mishkind-Feinberg Realty v. Sidorsky, 189 N.Y. 402, 407 , 82 N.E. 448 (1907))). -5- No. 75335-5-1/ 6 courts have used this logic in applying a similar priority rule.1° And, while no Washington court has yet applied the compulsory counterclaim rule in a priority of action analysis, we agree w | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Martingreen2 sentences2017C.P.L.R. § 304 (a) ("An action is commenced by filing a summons and complaint or summons with notice."); see also Martin v. Martin, 38 Misc. 2d 836, 837 , 238 N.Y.S.2d 749 (Sup. Ct. 1963) ("The summons 'is always of prime importance,' being 'the effective paper upon which jurisdiction is founded." (quoting Mishkind-Feinberg Realty v. Sidorsky, 189 N.Y. 402, 407 , 82 N.E. 448 (1907))). -5- No. 75335-5-1/ 6 courts have used this logic in applying a similar priority rule.1° And, while no Washington court has yet applied the compulsory counterclaim rule in a priority of action analysis, we agree w 2017C.P.L.R. § 304 (a) ("An action is commenced by filing a summons and complaint or summons with notice."); see also Martin v. Martin, 38 Misc. 2d 836, 837 , 238 N.Y.S.2d 749 (Sup. Ct. 1963) ("The summons 'is always of prime importance,' being 'the effective paper upon which jurisdiction is founded." (quoting Mishkind-Feinberg Realty v. Sidorsky, 189 N.Y. 402, 407 , 82 N.E. 448 (1907))). -5- No. 75335-5-1/ 6 courts have used this logic in applying a similar priority rule.1° And, while no Washington court has yet applied the compulsory counterclaim rule in a priority of action analysis, we agree w | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chee Chew v. Lord
green
2 sentences2017Chee Chew, 143 Wn. 2016Schoeman, 106 Wn.2d at 863 ; Chew, 143 Wn. | 4 | 2011–2017 |
Smith v. King
green
2 sentences2025Smith v. King, 106 Wn.2d 443, 451-52 , 722 P.2d 796 (1986). 10 No. 39725-4-III; No. 39771-8-III Margitan v. Hanna The purpose of the compulsory counterclaim rule is to prevent piecemeal litigation. 2025Smith v. King, 106 Wn.2d 443, 451-52 , 722 P.2d 796 (1986). 10 No. 39725-4-III; No. 39771-8-III Margitan v. Hanna The purpose of the compulsory counterclaim rule is to prevent piecemeal litigation. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Henry Modell & Co. v. Minister
green
2 sentences2017App. at 607 . 12 Henry Modell & Co. v. Minister, Elders & Deacons of Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of City of N.Y., 68 N.Y.2d 456, 461 , 502 N.E.2d 978 , 510 N.Y.S.2d 63 (1986) ("While New York does not have a compulsory counterclaim rule, a party is not free to remain silent in an action in which he is the defendant and then bring a second action seeking relief inconsistent with the judgment in the first action by asserting what is simply a new legal theory." (citation omitted)). 13 O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 357 , 429 N.E.2d 1158 , 445 N.Y.S.2d 687 (1981). -6- No. 75335-5 2017App. at 607 . 12 Henry Modell & Co. v. Minister, Elders & Deacons of Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of City of N.Y., 68 N.Y.2d 456, 461 , 502 N.E.2d 978 , 510 N.Y.S.2d 63 (1986) ("While New York does not have a compulsory counterclaim rule, a party is not free to remain silent in an action in which he is the defendant and then bring a second action seeking relief inconsistent with the judgment in the first action by asserting what is simply a new legal theory." (citation omitted)). 13 O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 357 , 429 N.E.2d 1158 , 445 N.Y.S.2d 687 (1981). -6- No. 75335-5 | 1 | 2017–2017 |
O'Brien v. City of Syracuse
green
2 sentences2017App. at 607 . 12 Henry Modell & Co. v. Minister, Elders & Deacons of Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of City of N.Y., 68 N.Y.2d 456, 461 , 502 N.E.2d 978 , 510 N.Y.S.2d 63 (1986) ("While New York does not have a compulsory counterclaim rule, a party is not free to remain silent in an action in which he is the defendant and then bring a second action seeking relief inconsistent with the judgment in the first action by asserting what is simply a new legal theory." (citation omitted)). 13 O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 357 , 429 N.E.2d 1158 , 445 N.Y.S.2d 687 (1981). -6- No. 75335-5 2017App. at 607 . 12 Henry Modell & Co. v. Minister, Elders & Deacons of Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of City of N.Y., 68 N.Y.2d 456, 461 , 502 N.E.2d 978 , 510 N.Y.S.2d 63 (1986) ("While New York does not have a compulsory counterclaim rule, a party is not free to remain silent in an action in which he is the defendant and then bring a second action seeking relief inconsistent with the judgment in the first action by asserting what is simply a new legal theory." (citation omitted)). 13 O'Brien v. City of Syracuse, 54 N.Y.2d 353, 357 , 429 N.E.2d 1158 , 445 N.Y.S.2d 687 (1981). -6- No. 75335-5 | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Schoeman v. New York Life Insurance
green
1 sentence2016Schoeman, 106 Wn.2d at 863 ; Chew, 143 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Trimble v. HOLMES HARBOR SEWER DIST.
neutral
1 sentence2008App. 665, 681 , 151 P.3d 1038 (2007), review denied, 163 Wn.2d 1003 (2008). ¶10 Washington, Nevada, and the federal courts share an identical compulsory counterclaim rule: A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim and does not require for its adjudication the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Green v. Normandy Park
green
1 sentence2008App. 665, 681 , 151 P.3d 1038 (2007), review denied, 163 Wn.2d 1003 (2008). ¶10 Washington, Nevada, and the federal courts share an identical compulsory counterclaim rule: A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim and does not require for its adjudication the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Smith Contracting Corp. v. Trojan Const. Co., Inc
green
1 sentence1988Co., 192 F.2d 234 (10th Cir. 1951). *886 According to one commentator, the language used in CR 13(f) is so broad as to nearly make such leave subject to the uncontrolled discretion of the court; this commentator opines that such liberality is understandable because of the possibility that the compulsory counterclaim rule might prevent the defendant from ever raising his claim. 3A L. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
American Discount Corp. v. Saratoga West, Inc.
green
2 sentences1986American Discount Corp. v. Saratoga West, Inc., 81 Wn.2d 34, 37 , 499 P.2d 869 (1972). 3 The statute of limitations is not at issue in this case. 1986American Discount Corp. v. Saratoga West, Inc., 81 Wn.2d 34, 37 , 499 P.2d 869 (1972). 3 The statute of limitations is not at issue in this case. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.