9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Copelandgreen2 sentences2001See, e.g., Copeland, 130 Wn.2d 244 (DNA extracted from crime scene discarded after testing); Wittenbarger, 124 Wn.2d 467 (maintenance and repair records of DataMaster breath test machines not recorded); Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 (breath samples of DWI defendants not preserved). 2001See, e.g., Copeland, 130 Wash.2d 244 , 922 P.2d 1304 (DNA extracted from crime scene discarded after testing); Wittenbarger, 124 Wash.2d 467 , 880 P.2d 517 (maintenance and repair records of Data-Master breath test machines not recorded); Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 , 104 S.Ct. 2528 , 81 L.Ed.2d 413 (breath samples of DWI defendants not preserved). [6] The State argues that this court should not be bound by the trial court's ruling of inadmissibility of the photograph, since the outcome of the balancing test of ER 403 may be different now that the actual coat is not available. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Copelandgreen1 sentence2001See, e.g., Copeland, 130 Wash.2d 244 , 922 P.2d 1304 (DNA extracted from crime scene discarded after testing); Wittenbarger, 124 Wash.2d 467 , 880 P.2d 517 (maintenance and repair records of Data-Master breath test machines not recorded); Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 , 104 S.Ct. 2528 , 81 L.Ed.2d 413 (breath samples of DWI defendants not preserved). [6] The State argues that this court should not be bound by the trial court's ruling of inadmissibility of the photograph, since the outcome of the balancing test of ER 403 may be different now that the actual coat is not available. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Strakagreen2 sentences1994See State v. Straka, 116 Wn.2d 859, 885 , 810 P.2d 888 (1991); California v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479, 489-90 , 81 L.Ed.2d 413 , 104 S.Ct. 2528 (1984); Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 58 , 102 L.Ed.2d *489 281, 109 S.Ct. 333 (1988). 1994See State v. Straka, 116 Wn.2d 859, 885 , 810 P.2d 888 (1991); California v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479, 489-90 , 81 L.Ed.2d 413 , 104 S.Ct. 2528 (1984); Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 58 , 102 L.Ed.2d *489 281, 109 S.Ct. 333 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
City of St. Louis Park v. Bunkersgreen2 sentences1991See also State v. Bunkers, 310 Minn. 431 , 247 N.W.2d 404 (1976) (results of breath test suppressed where police failed to accede to a timely request for an attorney prior to the breath test); State v. Knoll, 322 N.C. 535 , 369 S.E.2d 558 (1988) (there is no per se rule of prejudice requiring dismissal of DWI case for denial of statutory right to counsel in DWI case; dismissal is only proper upon a showing of irreparable prejudice). 1991See also State v. Bunkers, 310 Minn. 431 , 247 N.W.2d 404 (1976) (results of breath test suppressed where police failed to accede to a timely request for an attorney prior to the breath test); State v. Knoll, 322 N.C. 535 , 369 S.E.2d 558 (1988) (there is no per se rule of prejudice requiring dismissal of DWI case for denial of statutory right to counsel in DWI case; dismissal is only proper upon a showing of irreparable prejudice). | 1 | 1 |
Gooch v. Spradlinggreen1 sentence1980See Gooch v. Spradling, supra (Missouri); McNulty v. Curry, 42 Ohio St. 2d 341 , 328 N.E.2d 798 (1975); Prideaux v. Department of Pub. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
California v. Trombetta
green
2 sentences2001See, e.g., Copeland, 130 Wn.2d 244 (DNA extracted from crime scene discarded after testing); Wittenbarger, 124 Wn.2d 467 (maintenance and repair records of DataMaster breath test machines not recorded); Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 (breath samples of DWI defendants not preserved). 2001See, e.g., Copeland, 130 Wash.2d 244 , 922 P.2d 1304 (DNA extracted from crime scene discarded after testing); Wittenbarger, 124 Wash.2d 467 , 880 P.2d 517 (maintenance and repair records of Data-Master breath test machines not recorded); Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 , 104 S.Ct. 2528 , 81 L.Ed.2d 413 (breath samples of DWI defendants not preserved). [6] The State argues that this court should not be bound by the trial court's ruling of inadmissibility of the photograph, since the outcome of the balancing test of ER 403 may be different now that the actual coat is not available. | 3 | 1994–2001 |
State v. Wittenbarger
green
2 sentences2001See, e.g., Copeland, 130 Wn.2d 244 (DNA extracted from crime scene discarded after testing); Wittenbarger, 124 Wn.2d 467 (maintenance and repair records of DataMaster breath test machines not recorded); Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 (breath samples of DWI defendants not preserved). 2001See, e.g., Copeland, 130 Wash.2d 244 , 922 P.2d 1304 (DNA extracted from crime scene discarded after testing); Wittenbarger, 124 Wash.2d 467 , 880 P.2d 517 (maintenance and repair records of Data-Master breath test machines not recorded); Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479 , 104 S.Ct. 2528 , 81 L.Ed.2d 413 (breath samples of DWI defendants not preserved). [6] The State argues that this court should not be bound by the trial court's ruling of inadmissibility of the photograph, since the outcome of the balancing test of ER 403 may be different now that the actual coat is not available. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Metlow v. Spokane Alcoholic Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences1999This standard is, in any event, inconsistent with the definition of "good cause" the Court of Appeals adopted. [6] The County additionally relies upon Metlow v. Spokane Alcoholic Rehabilitation Ctr., Inc., 55 Wash.App. 845 , 781 P.2d 498 (1989), where the court held that a private alcohol rehabilitation center which contracted to provide nonresidential treatment to DWI defendants in the state's deferred prosecution program had no duty to protect third persons from a program participant's driving while intoxicated. 1999App. 845, 781 P.2d 498 (1989), where the court held that a private alcohol rehabilitation center which contracted to provide nonresidential treatment to DWI defendants in the state’s deferred prosecution program had no duty to protect third persons from a program participant’s driving while intoxicated. | 2 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Fitzsimmons
green
2 sentences1994State v. Fitzsimmons, 93 Wn.2d 436, 447-48 , 610 P.2d 893 , 18 A.L.R.4th 690 , vacated and remanded, 449 U.S. 977 , 66 L. 1994State v. Fitzsimmons, 93 Wn.2d 436, 447-48 , 610 P.2d 893 , 18 A.L.R.4th 690 , vacated and remanded, 449 U.S. 977 , 66 L. | 2 | 1989–1994 |
Arizona v. Youngblood
green
2 sentences1994See State v. Straka, 116 Wn.2d 859, 885 , 810 P.2d 888 (1991); California v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479, 489-90 , 81 L.Ed.2d 413 , 104 S.Ct. 2528 (1984); Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 58 , 102 L.Ed.2d *489 281, 109 S.Ct. 333 (1988). 1994See State v. Straka, 116 Wn.2d 859, 885 , 810 P.2d 888 (1991); California v. Trombetta, 467 U.S. 479, 489-90 , 81 L.Ed.2d 413 , 104 S.Ct. 2528 (1984); Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 58 , 102 L.Ed.2d *489 281, 109 S.Ct. 333 (1988). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Exxon Corp. v. City of Mentor
green
1 sentence1994State v. Fitzsimmons, 93 Wn.2d 436, 447-48 , 610 P.2d 893 , 18 A.L.R.4th 690 , vacated and remanded, 449 U.S. 977 , 66 L. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
In re Disbarment of Campbell
green
1 sentence1994State v. Fitzsimmons, 93 Wn.2d 436, 447-48 , 610 P.2d 893 , 18 A.L.R.4th 690 , vacated and remanded, 449 U.S. 977 , 66 L. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Veillon v. Veillon
green
2 sentences1991Ct. App.) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of statutory and constitutional right to counsel), writ denied, 519 So.2d 105 (1987); People v. Gursey, 22 N.Y.2d 224 , 239 N.E.2d 351 , 292 N.Y.S.2d 416 (1968) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel); People v. Wilmot-Kay, 134 Misc.2d 1081 , 514 N.Y.S.2d 313 (1987) (motion to suppress granted for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel). 1991Ct. App.) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of statutory and constitutional right to counsel), writ denied, 519 So. 2d 105 (1987); People v. Gursey, 22 N.Y.2d 224 , 239 N.E.2d 351 , 292 N.Y.S.2d 416 (1968) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel); People v. Wilmot-Kay, 134 Misc. 2d 1081 , 514 N.Y.S.2d 313 (1987) (motion to suppress granted for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Wilmot-Kay
neutral
2 sentences1991Ct. App.) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of statutory and constitutional right to counsel), writ denied, 519 So. 2d 105 (1987); People v. Gursey, 22 N.Y.2d 224 , 239 N.E.2d 351 , 292 N.Y.S.2d 416 (1968) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel); People v. Wilmot-Kay, 134 Misc. 2d 1081 , 514 N.Y.S.2d 313 (1987) (motion to suppress granted for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel). 1991Ct. App.) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of statutory and constitutional right to counsel), writ denied, 519 So. 2d 105 (1987); People v. Gursey, 22 N.Y.2d 224 , 239 N.E.2d 351 , 292 N.Y.S.2d 416 (1968) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel); People v. Wilmot-Kay, 134 Misc. 2d 1081 , 514 N.Y.S.2d 313 (1987) (motion to suppress granted for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Gursey
green
2 sentences1991Ct. App.) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of statutory and constitutional right to counsel), writ denied, 519 So. 2d 105 (1987); People v. Gursey, 22 N.Y.2d 224 , 239 N.E.2d 351 , 292 N.Y.S.2d 416 (1968) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel); People v. Wilmot-Kay, 134 Misc. 2d 1081 , 514 N.Y.S.2d 313 (1987) (motion to suppress granted for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel). 1991Ct. App.) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of statutory and constitutional right to counsel), writ denied, 519 So. 2d 105 (1987); People v. Gursey, 22 N.Y.2d 224 , 239 N.E.2d 351 , 292 N.Y.S.2d 416 (1968) (suppression is proper remedy for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel); People v. Wilmot-Kay, 134 Misc. 2d 1081 , 514 N.Y.S.2d 313 (1987) (motion to suppress granted for violation of DWI defendant's right to counsel). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Knoll
green
2 sentences1991See also State v. Bunkers, 310 Minn. 431 , 247 N.W.2d 404 (1976) (results of breath test suppressed where police failed to accede to a timely request for an attorney prior to the breath test); State v. Knoll, 322 N.C. 535 , 369 S.E.2d 558 (1988) (there is no per se rule of prejudice requiring dismissal of DWI case for denial of statutory right to counsel in DWI case; dismissal is only proper upon a showing of irreparable prejudice). 1991See also State v. Bunkers, 310 Minn. 431 , 247 N.W.2d 404 (1976) (results of breath test suppressed where police failed to accede to a timely request for an attorney prior to the breath test); State v. Knoll, 322 N.C. 535 , 369 S.E.2d 558 (1988) (there is no per se rule of prejudice requiring dismissal of DWI case for denial of statutory right to counsel in DWI case; dismissal is only proper upon a showing of irreparable prejudice). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
McNulty v. Curry
green
2 sentences1980See Gooch v. Spradling, supra (Missouri); McNulty v. Curry, 42 Ohio St. 2d 341 , 328 N.E.2d 798 (1975); Prideaux v. Department of Pub. 1980See Gooch v. Spradling, supra (Missouri); McNulty v. Curry, 42 Ohio St. 2d 341 , 328 N.E.2d 798 (1975); Prideaux v. Department of Pub. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.