DWI plea (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

DWI plea in Louisiana

14 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In the Matter of Dearmangreen
sc · 1982 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
2 sentences

2004See, In the Matter of Dearman, 277 S.C. 394 , 287 S.E.2d 921 (1982) (removed judge suffering from alcoholism pursuant to a disciplinary rule providing that a judge shall be removed for "habitual intemperance"); Kneifl v. Kneifl, 217 Neb. 472 , 351 N.W.2d 693 (1984) (judge suspended without pay for three months based on two isolated incidents which involved cursing and threatening police officers while being booked with DWI); In the Matter of Jett, 179 W.Va. 521 , 370 S.E.2d 485 (1988) (judge suspended for sixty days without pay for presiding over one DWI hearing while intoxicated); In the Matt

2004See, In the Matter of Dearman, 277 S.C. 394 , 287 S.E.2d 921 (1982) (removed judge suffering from alcoholism pursuant to a disciplinary rule providing that a judge shall be removed for "habitual intemperance"); Kneifl v. Kneifl, 217 Neb. 472 , 351 N.W.2d 693 (1984) (judge suspended without pay for three months based on two isolated incidents which involved cursing and threatening police officers while being booked with DWI); In the Matter of Jett, 179 W.Va. 521 , 370 S.E.2d 485 (1988) (judge suspended for sixty days without pay for presiding over one DWI hearing while intoxicated); In the Matt

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (17)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Taylor green
la · 1983
2 sentences

2011In State v. Taylor, 439 So.2d 410 (La.1983), the State first attempted service of a notice of arraignment on a DWI defendant at the address written on the traffic 13citation issued at the time of the offense.

1996In State v. Taylor, 439 So.2d 410 (La.1983), the state first attempted service of a notice of arraignment on a DWI defendant at the address written on the traffic citation issued at the time of the offense.

21996–2011
State v. Kerwin green
lactapp · 2002
2 sentences

2004State v. Granier, 03-447 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/30/03) , 857 So.2d 1176, 1178-1179 ; State v. Kerwin, 02-103 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/15/02, 821 So.2d 28 ).

2003State v. Kerwin, 02-103, p. 4 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/15/02), 821 So.2d 28, 31 .

22003–2004
State v. Barron green
lactapp · 2000
2 sentences

2004The court stated: The circumstances surrounding the instant predicate plea are similar to the facts of State v. Barron, 32-960 (La.App. 2 Cir. 4/5/00) , 758 So.2d 965 , 967-968 since in Barron, the trial judge did not specifically inquire into defendant’s literacy and competency in accepting an uncounselled DWI plea.

2001The circumstances surrounding the instant predicate plea are similar to the facts of State v. Barron, 32-960, (La.App. 2 Cir.4/5/00), 758 So.2d 965 , 967-968 since in Barron , the trial judge did not specifically inquire into defendant's literacy and competency in accepting an uncounselled DWI plea.

22001–2004
State v. Boudreaux green
lactapp · 2000
2 sentences

2002Boudreaux, 756 So.2d at 508 .

2001State v. Boudreaux, 99-1017 (La.App.5 Cir.2/16/00), 756 So.2d 505 .

22001–2002
State v. Snider neutral
lactapp · 1997
2 sentences

2000State v. Rison, 32,244 (La.App.2d Cir.8/18/99), 746 So.2d 46 and State v. Snider, 30,568 (La.App.2d Cir.10/21/97), 707 So.2d 1262 writ denied, 97-3025 (La.2/13/98), 709 So.2d 748 .

1999State v. Snider, 30,568 (La.App.2d Cir.10/21/97), 707 So.2d 1262 , writ denied, 97-3025 (La.2/13/98), 709 So.2d 748 ; State v. Mashaw, 554 So.2d 169 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989).

21999–2000
State v. Snider neutral
la · 1998
2 sentences

2000State v. Rison, 32,244 (La.App.2d Cir.8/18/99), 746 So.2d 46 and State v. Snider, 30,568 (La.App.2d Cir.10/21/97), 707 So.2d 1262 writ denied, 97-3025 (La.2/13/98), 709 So.2d 748 .

1999State v. Snider, 30,568 (La.App.2d Cir.10/21/97), 707 So.2d 1262 , writ denied, 97-3025 (La.2/13/98), 709 So.2d 748 ; State v. Mashaw, 554 So.2d 169 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989).

21999–2000
State v. Campbell green
la · 2004
1 sentence

2006In other words, the court did not find "patent error." The Louisiana Supreme Court, as a whole, has not recognized "patent error" since State v. Campbell , XXXX-XXXX (La.7/6/04), 877 So.2d 112 . [5] Therein, the court noted that the district court had allowed the DWI defendant to keep the car he was driving at the time of the offense, in violation of La.

12006–2006
In the Matter of King green
mass · 1991
2 sentences

2004See, In the Matter of Dearman, 277 S.C. 394 , 287 S.E.2d 921 (1982) (removed judge suffering from alcoholism pursuant to a disciplinary rule providing that a judge shall be removed for "habitual intemperance"); Kneifl v. Kneifl, 217 Neb. 472 , 351 N.W.2d 693 (1984) (judge suspended without pay for three months based on two isolated incidents which involved cursing and threatening police officers while being booked with DWI); In the Matter of Jett, 179 W.Va. 521 , 370 S.E.2d 485 (1988) (judge suspended for sixty days without pay for presiding over one DWI hearing while intoxicated); In the Matt

2004See, In the Matter of Dearman, 277 S.C. 394 , 287 S.E.2d 921 (1982) (removed judge suffering from alcoholism pursuant to a disciplinary rule providing that a judge shall be removed for "habitual intemperance"); Kneifl v. Kneifl, 217 Neb. 472 , 351 N.W.2d 693 (1984) (judge suspended without pay for three months based on two isolated incidents which involved cursing and threatening police officers while being booked with DWI); In the Matter of Jett, 179 W.Va. 521 , 370 S.E.2d 485 (1988) (judge suspended for sixty days without pay for presiding over one DWI hearing while intoxicated); In the Matt

12004–2004
In Re Kneifl green
neb · 1984
2 sentences

2004See, In the Matter of Dearman, 277 S.C. 394 , 287 S.E.2d 921 (1982) (removed judge suffering from alcoholism pursuant to a disciplinary rule providing that a judge shall be removed for "habitual intemperance"); Kneifl v. Kneifl, 217 Neb. 472 , 351 N.W.2d 693 (1984) (judge suspended without pay for three months based on two isolated incidents which involved cursing and threatening police officers while being booked with DWI); In the Matter of Jett, 179 W.Va. 521 , 370 S.E.2d 485 (1988) (judge suspended for sixty days without pay for presiding over one DWI hearing while intoxicated); In the Matt

2004See, In the Matter of Dearman, 277 S.C. 394 , 287 S.E.2d 921 (1982) (removed judge suffering from alcoholism pursuant to a disciplinary rule providing that a judge shall be removed for "habitual intemperance"); Kneifl v. Kneifl, 217 Neb. 472 , 351 N.W.2d 693 (1984) (judge suspended without pay for three months based on two isolated incidents which involved cursing and threatening police officers while being booked with DWI); In the Matter of Jett, 179 W.Va. 521 , 370 S.E.2d 485 (1988) (judge suspended for sixty days without pay for presiding over one DWI hearing while intoxicated); In the Matt

12004–2004
State v. Vu neutral
lactapp · 2003
1 sentence

2004Those cases hold that the noted language of the statute "evidences a clear intent by the Legislature that all prior DWI convictions be considered in determining the applicable penalty ... and that it is the number of prior convictions, not their sequence, which determines the appropriate designation of a subsequent offense." State v. Woods, 402 So.2d 680 (La.1981); State v. Vu, 02-1243 (La.App. 5th Cir.4/8/03), 846 So.2d 67, 72 .

12004–2004
In Re Cope green
fla · 2003
1 sentence

2004See, In the Matter of Dearman, 277 S.C. 394 , 287 S.E.2d 921 (1982) (removed judge suffering from alcoholism pursuant to a disciplinary rule providing that a judge shall be removed for "habitual intemperance"); Kneifl v. Kneifl, 217 Neb. 472 , 351 N.W.2d 693 (1984) (judge suspended without pay for three months based on two isolated incidents which involved cursing and threatening police officers while being booked with DWI); In the Matter of Jett, 179 W.Va. 521 , 370 S.E.2d 485 (1988) (judge suspended for sixty days without pay for presiding over one DWI hearing while intoxicated); In the Matt

12004–2004
State v. Granier green
lactapp · 2003
1 sentence

2004State v. Granier, 03-447 (La.App. 5 Cir. 9/30/03) , 857 So.2d 1176, 1178-1179 ; State v. Kerwin, 02-103 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/15/02, 821 So.2d 28 ).

12004–2004
Matter of Jett neutral
wva · 1988
2 sentences

2004See, In the Matter of Dearman, 277 S.C. 394 , 287 S.E.2d 921 (1982) (removed judge suffering from alcoholism pursuant to a disciplinary rule providing that a judge shall be removed for "habitual intemperance"); Kneifl v. Kneifl, 217 Neb. 472 , 351 N.W.2d 693 (1984) (judge suspended without pay for three months based on two isolated incidents which involved cursing and threatening police officers while being booked with DWI); In the Matter of Jett, 179 W.Va. 521 , 370 S.E.2d 485 (1988) (judge suspended for sixty days without pay for presiding over one DWI hearing while intoxicated); In the Matt

2004See, In the Matter of Dearman, 277 S.C. 394 , 287 S.E.2d 921 (1982) (removed judge suffering from alcoholism pursuant to a disciplinary rule providing that a judge shall be removed for "habitual intemperance"); Kneifl v. Kneifl, 217 Neb. 472 , 351 N.W.2d 693 (1984) (judge suspended without pay for three months based on two isolated incidents which involved cursing and threatening police officers while being booked with DWI); In the Matter of Jett, 179 W.Va. 521 , 370 S.E.2d 485 (1988) (judge suspended for sixty days without pay for presiding over one DWI hearing while intoxicated); In the Matt

12004–2004
State v. Woods green
la · 1981
1 sentence

2004Those cases hold that the noted language of the statute "evidences a clear intent by the Legislature that all prior DWI convictions be considered in determining the applicable penalty ... and that it is the number of prior convictions, not their sequence, which determines the appropriate designation of a subsequent offense." State v. Woods, 402 So.2d 680 (La.1981); State v. Vu, 02-1243 (La.App. 5th Cir.4/8/03), 846 So.2d 67, 72 .

12004–2004
State v. Rison neutral
lactapp · 1999
1 sentence

2000State v. Rison, 32,244 (La.App.2d Cir.8/18/99), 746 So.2d 46 and State v. Snider, 30,568 (La.App.2d Cir.10/21/97), 707 So.2d 1262 writ denied, 97-3025 (La.2/13/98), 709 So.2d 748 .

12000–2000
State v. Pickett green
lactapp · 1999
1 sentence

2000Pickett, 99-532 at p. 8, 746 So.2d at 189-190 .

12000–2000
State v. Mashaw neutral
lactapp · 1989
1 sentence

1999State v. Snider, 30,568 (La.App.2d Cir.10/21/97), 707 So.2d 1262 , writ denied, 97-3025 (La.2/13/98), 709 So.2d 748 ; State v. Mashaw, 554 So.2d 169 (La.App. 2d Cir.1989).

11999–1999

Where else courts name it

TX 86 (1990–2025) NJ 39 (1988–2025) MN 23 (1981–2023) NM 16 (1997–2022) LA 14 (1996–2011) WA 9 (1980–2001) AK 7 (1983–2011) NY 6 (1984–2011) MO 6 (1997–2018) NC 6 (1990–2017) NH 5 (1987–2021) AR 3 (1997–2003) AZ 2 (1983–1989)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check