9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1918–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.green2 sentences2003Co., 120 Wn.2d 246 , 294 n.7, 840 P.2d 860 (1992) (“[w]hile RCW 4.22.030 suggests that RCW 4.22.070 is an exception to a general rule, RCW 4.22.070 is in fact an exception that has all but swallowed the general rule”). 2003Co., 120 Wn.2d 246 , 294 n.7, 840 P.2d 860 (1992) (“[w]hile RCW 4.22.030 suggests that RCW 4.22.070 is an exception to a general rule, RCW 4.22.070 is in fact an exception that has all but swallowed the general rule”). | 4 | 6 |
Kottler v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Further, the Legislature amended RCW 4.22.030 to make it applicable “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in RCW 4.22.070. ” “While RCW 4.22.030 suggests that RCW 4.22.070 is an exception to a general rule, RCW 4.22.070 is in fact an exception that has all but swallowed the general rule.” Washburn, 120 Wn.2d at 294 n.7; accord Kottler, 136 Wn.2d at 443 n.5. 2001Further, the Legislature amended RCW 4.22.030 to make it applicable "[e]xcept as otherwise provided in RCW 4.22.070." "While RCW 4.22.030 suggests that RCW 4.22.070 is an exception to a general rule, RCW 4.22.070 is in fact an exception that has all but swallowed the general rule." Washburn, 120 Wash.2d at 294 n. 7, 840 P.2d 860 ; accord, Kottler, 136 Wash.2d at 443 n. 5, 963 P.2d 834 . | 2 | 2 |
Kottler v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Further, the Legislature amended RCW 4.22.030 to make it applicable "[e]xcept as otherwise provided in RCW 4.22.070." "While RCW 4.22.030 suggests that RCW 4.22.070 is an exception to a general rule, RCW 4.22.070 is in fact an exception that has all but swallowed the general rule." Washburn, 120 Wash.2d at 294 n. 7, 840 P.2d 860 ; accord, Kottler, 136 Wash.2d at 443 n. 5, 963 P.2d 834 . 2001Thus, "RCW 4.22.070, the centerpiece of the 1986 amendatory package, requires all liability be apportioned unless a listed exception applies in which case joint and several liability is retained." Kottler, 136 Wash.2d at 443 , 963 P.2d 834 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kohne v. White
neutral
2 sentences1944Kohne v. White, 12 Wash. 199 , 40 Pac. 794 ; Purcell v. Warburton, 70 Wash. 129 , *734 126 Pac. 89 . 1944Kohne v. White, 12 Wash. 199 , 40 Pac. 794 ; Purcell v. Warburton, 70 Wash. 129 , *734 126 Pac. 89 . | 2 | 1918–1944 |
Purcell v. Warburton
neutral
2 sentences1944Kohne v. White, 12 Wash. 199 , 40 Pac. 794 ; Purcell v. Warburton, 70 Wash. 129 , *734 126 Pac. 89 . 1944Kohne v. White, 12 Wash. 199 , 40 Pac. 794 ; Purcell v. Warburton, 70 Wash. 129 , *734 126 Pac. 89 . | 2 | 1918–1944 |
State v. Ramos
green
1 sentence2018The Washington Supreme Court, in State v. Ramos, 187 Wn.2d 420 (2017), also ignored the principle that one who relies on an exception to a general rule bears the burden of proving that the case falls within the exception. 29 AM. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.