Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Texas opinions name it 4 courts 1877–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Campbellgreen2 sentences2017This “maxim operates only when a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter is intended or when addressing an exception to a general rule.” Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 923 (Tex. Crim. 2017This "maxim operates only when a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter is intended or when addressing an exception to a general rule.” Ex parte Campbell, 267 S.W.3d 916, 923 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dallas v. State
green
1 sentence2008PROC. art. 44.04(a)(authorizing misdemeanor bail but containing no language specifically authorizing conditions of bail), (c)(providing in felony cases that the court "may impose reasonable conditions on bail pending the finality of [the defendant's] conviction"). [44] Dallas, 983 S.W.2d at 279-80 . [45] There is a different aspect of Chapter 508 that does satisfy Dallas by prescribing an exception to a general rule: the mandatory provisions. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Behrens Drug Co. v. Hamilton & McCarty
green
1 sentence1924The occasion of .the amendment to the venue statute could only have been to insure that, as to any contract or obligation, whether it be written, or partly written and partly unwritten, the obligor should have the right, of not being sued outside the county of his domicile, unless his obligation was by the terms of the contract performable in another county and was performable in anotiher county, moreover, because of a written engagement to that effect. [1,2] It has been settled that “tikis is an exception to a general rule and must be construed as such,” that in order to avail himself of it, | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Cohen v. Munson
neutral
1 sentence1924The occasion of .the amendment to the venue statute could only have been to insure that, as to any contract or obligation, whether it be written, or partly written and partly unwritten, the obligor should have the right, of not being sued outside the county of his domicile, unless his obligation was by the terms of the contract performable in another county and was performable in anotiher county, moreover, because of a written engagement to that effect. [1,2] It has been settled that “tikis is an exception to a general rule and must be construed as such,” that in order to avail himself of it, | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Max Lindheim & Bro. v. Muschamp
green
1 sentence1924The occasion of .the amendment to the venue statute could only have been to insure that, as to any contract or obligation, whether it be written, or partly written and partly unwritten, the obligor should have the right, of not being sued outside the county of his domicile, unless his obligation was by the terms of the contract performable in another county and was performable in anotiher county, moreover, because of a written engagement to that effect. [1,2] It has been settled that “tikis is an exception to a general rule and must be construed as such,” that in order to avail himself of it, | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Lasater v. Waits
green
1 sentence1924The occasion of .the amendment to the venue statute could only have been to insure that, as to any contract or obligation, whether it be written, or partly written and partly unwritten, the obligor should have the right, of not being sued outside the county of his domicile, unless his obligation was by the terms of the contract performable in another county and was performable in anotiher county, moreover, because of a written engagement to that effect. [1,2] It has been settled that “tikis is an exception to a general rule and must be construed as such,” that in order to avail himself of it, | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Fisk v. Miller
green
1 sentence1877(Fisk v. Miller, 20 Tex., 579 .) To hold that the appeal would not suspend the decree dissolving the injunction during its pendency in this court, would require an exception to a general rule, as to the effect of appeals upon the judgments of inferior courts, for which we can see no good reason. ( 42 Tex., 508, 513 .) The question presented in this case, it will be observed, is not whether the appeal will revive a judgment which had been dissolved previous to the final judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted, but whether an injunction, which was in full force and effect when the final jud | 1 | 1877–1877 |
Ledbetter v. Burns
green
1 sentence1877(Fisk v. Miller, 20 Tex., 579 .) To hold that the appeal would not suspend the decree dissolving the injunction during its pendency in this court, would require an exception to a general rule, as to the effect of appeals upon the judgments of inferior courts, for which we can see no good reason. ( 42 Tex., 508, 513 .) The question presented in this case, it will be observed, is not whether the appeal will revive a judgment which had been dissolved previous to the final judgment from which the appeal is prosecuted, but whether an injunction, which was in full force and effect when the final jud | 1 | 1877–1877 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.