evidence to rebut claim in Indiana

2019"The standard of review for a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to rebut a claim of self-defense is the same standard for any sufficiency of the evidence claim." Id. at 801 .

2019“The standard of review for a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to rebut a claim of self- defense is the same standard for any sufficiency of the evidence claim.” Id. at 801 . [10] In arguing that the State failed to rebut his self-defense claim, Thomas asserts that he was justified in defending himself because the Detectives cannot be said Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-2234 | May 16, 2019 Page 6 of 7 to have been engaged in the lawful execution of their duties given that they used unreasonable force in their attempts to detain him.

2011See Sanders v. State, 704 N.E.2d 119, 123 (Ind.1999).

2008See Sanders v. State, 704 N.E.2d 119, 123 (Ind.1999).

2018Cole v. State, 28 N.E.3d 1126, 1137 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015). [11] When reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to rebut a claim of self defense, we use the same standard as for any claim of insufficient evidence.

2017Cole v. State, 28 N.E.3d 1126, 1137 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015). [12] In reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to rebut a claim of self-defense, we use the same standard as for any claim of insufficient evidence.

2025And “[w]hen a defendant challenges the State’s sufficiency of the evidence to rebut a claim of self- defense, the standard of review remains the same as for any sufficiency of the evidence claim.” Miller v. State, 720 N.E.2d 696, 699 (Ind. 1999). “[W]e do not reweigh evidence or assess witness credibility, and only look to the evidence most favorable to the judgment.” Larkin v. State, 173 N.E.3d 662 , 667 (Ind. 2021) (quotations omitted).

2019Id. [8] When a defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to rebut her claim of self-defense, the standard of review remains the same as for any sufficiency of evidence claim.

2016Wallace v. State, 725 N.E.2d 837, 840 (Ind. 2000).

2012The issue on appellate review is typically whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support a finding that at least one of the elements of the defendant‟s self-defense claim was negated. [Wallace v. State, 725 N.E.2d 837, 840 (Ind. 2000).] The standard of review for a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to rebut a claim of self-defense is the same as the standard for any sufficiency of the evidence claim.

2018Carroll v. State, 744 N.E.2d 432, 433 (Ind. 2001).

2012“We review a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to rebut a claim of self-defense using the same standard as for any claim of insufficient evidence.” Carroll v. State, 744 N.E.2d 432, 433 (Ind. 2001).

2015Willis, 888 N.E.2d at 183 .

2012Willis, 888 N.E.2d at 182-83 .

2015Id. [30] We review a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to rebut a claim of self- defense using the same standard as for any claim of insufficient evidence.

2015Id. at 841 .

2018Id. [82] We review a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence to rebut a claim of self- defense using the same standard as for any claim of insufficient evidence.

2001Milam v. State, 719 N.E.2d 1208, 1210 (Ind.1999), Sanders v. State, 704 N.E.2d 119, 128 (Ind.1999).

2020Quinn v. State, 126 N.E.3d 924, 927 (Ind. Ct. App. 2019).

2017Griesemer v. State, 26 N.E.3d 606, 608 (Ind. 2015).

2014McCullough v. State, 985 N.E.2d 1135, 1138 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013).

2013Spradlin v. State, 569 N.E.2d 948, 950 (Ind. 1991). 5 defense in the same manner as we review a typical appeal for the sufficiency of the evidence.