8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Uhl v. Foxgreen2 sentences2021Although the parties di sagreed as to the amount of the relevant estimated cost, the claim was held to be one for a “liquidated determinable amount of money due.”); Uhl v. Fox , 31 Colo. App. 13, 14-15, 498 P.2d 1177, 1178 (1972) (considering a written agreement for the sale of co rporate stock that established the sales price as the book value of that stock, as reflected in the quarterly financial statement that was to be issued at some date in the future; while it was necessary t o establish such book value by extrinsic evidence, a claim for viola tion of the promise to buy was a liquidated 2021Although the parties di sagreed as to the amount of the relevant estimated cost, the claim was held to be one for a “liquidated determinable amount of money due.”); Uhl v. Fox , 31 Colo. App. 13, 14-15, 498 P.2d 1177, 1178 (1972) (considering a written agreement for the sale of co rporate stock that established the sales price as the book value of that stock, as reflected in the quarterly financial statement that was to be issued at some date in the future; while it was necessary t o establish such book value by extrinsic evidence, a claim for viola tion of the promise to buy was a liquidated | 1 | 1 |
Comfort Homes, Inc. v. Petersongreen2 sentences1995Similarly, in Comfort Homes, Inc. v. Peterson, 37 Colo.App. 516, 519 , 549 P.2d 1087, 1090 (1976), the contract called for payment of a specific percentage of the estimated cost of the construction of a structure. 1995Similarly, in Comfort Homes, Inc. v. Peterson, 37 Colo.App. 516, 519 , 549 P.2d 1087, 1090 (1976), the contract called for payment of a specific percentage of the estimated cost of the construction of a structure. | 1 | 1 |
Ex parte Stembergreen2 sentences1993See, e.g., Ex parte Stember, 262 Ala. 56 , 77 So.2d 351 (1955); Termini v. John Arthur Exhibitions, Inc., 9 Misc.2d 557, 833 , 169 N.Y.S.2d 584 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1957). 1993See, e.g., Ex parte Stember, 262 Ala. 56 , 77 So.2d 351 (1955); Termini v. John Arthur Exhibitions, Inc., 9 Misc.2d 557, 833 , 169 N.Y.S.2d 584 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1957). | 1 | 1 |
American Surety Company of New York v. Murphygreen2 sentences1992See American Surety Co. v. Murphy, 151 Fla. 151 , 9 So.2d 355 (1942); Gardner Hotel Supply v. Estate of Clark, 83 Nev. 388 , 432 P.2d 495 (1967). 1992See American Surety Co. v. Murphy, 151 Fla. 151 , 9 So.2d 355 (1942); Gardner Hotel Supply v. Estate of Clark, 83 Nev. 388 , 432 P.2d 495 (1967). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Security Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Estate of Kite
green
1 sentence1999Security Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Estate of Kite, 857 P.2d 430 (Colo.App.1992), overruled on other grounds, In re Estate of Hall, supra. Here, the note lists decedent as co-maker, and by the terms of the note, decedent was personally liable upon delivery. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
York Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Groussman Investment Co.
green
2 sentences1998Mitchek relies upon York Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Groussman Investment Co., 166 Colo. 382 , 443 P.2d 986 (1968) which permitted the offset of an unliquidated claim against a liquidated claim before computation of interest. 1998Mitchek relies upon York Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Groussman Investment Co., 166 Colo. 382 , 443 P.2d 986 (1968) which permitted the offset of an unliquidated claim against a liquidated claim before computation of interest. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Hayes v. North Table Mountain Corp.
green
2 sentences1995In Hayes v. North Table Mountain Corp., 43 Colo.App. 467 , 608 P.2d 830 (1979), for example, a claim for a broker’s commission based upon a percentage of the purchase price of realty was determined to be a liquidated claim, although evidence from outside the agreement was required to establish the amount of the purchase price. 1995In Hayes v. North Table Mountain Corp., 43 Colo.App. 467 , 608 P.2d 830 (1979), for example, a claim for a broker’s commission based upon a percentage of the purchase price of realty was determined to be a liquidated claim, although evidence from outside the agreement was required to establish the amount of the purchase price. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Termini v. John Arthur Exhibitions, Inc.
green
2 sentences1993See, e.g., Ex parte Stember, 262 Ala. 56 , 77 So.2d 351 (1955); Termini v. John Arthur Exhibitions, Inc., 9 Misc.2d 557, 833 , 169 N.Y.S.2d 584 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1957). 1993See, e.g., Ex parte Stember, 262 Ala. 56 , 77 So.2d 351 (1955); Termini v. John Arthur Exhibitions, Inc., 9 Misc.2d 557, 833 , 169 N.Y.S.2d 584 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1957). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Gardner Hotel Supply of Houston v. Estate of Clark
green
2 sentences1992See American Surety Co. v. Murphy, 151 Fla. 151 , 9 So.2d 355 (1942); Gardner Hotel Supply v. Estate of Clark, 83 Nev. 388 , 432 P.2d 495 (1967). 1992See American Surety Co. v. Murphy, 151 Fla. 151 , 9 So.2d 355 (1942); Gardner Hotel Supply v. Estate of Clark, 83 Nev. 388 , 432 P.2d 495 (1967). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Wagonmaster, Inc. v. Parrot
green
1 sentence1987York Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Groussman Investment Co., supra; Wagonmaster, Inc. v. Parrot, 713 P.2d 417 (Colo.App.1985). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.
green
1 sentence1968“Where a claim under an agreement is certain and liquidated, but is reduced because of the allowance of an unliquidated off-set or counterclaim, interest may be allowed only on the balance due.” Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc., 64 N.J. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.