must conduct hearing (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

must conduct hearing in Colorado

8 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Bergerudgreen
colo · 2010 · cited in 3 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2020–2025
2 sentences

2025See People v. Bergerud, 223 P.3d 686 , 694-95 (Colo. 2010) (holding that a court must conduct a hearing, at which both attorney and client testify, 1 It appears that the trial court never ruled on the motion to withdraw.

2024People v. Bergerud, 223 P.3d 686, 694-95 (Colo. 2010).) 30 ¶ 78 In his first motion for new counsel, Ramcharan complained that his public defender was not communicative and that there was a “lack of trust” between them.

33
People in the Interest of CLSgreen
coloctapp · 1996 · cited in 2 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016People in Interest of S.N. v. S.N. , 2014 CO 64, ¶10 ; People in Interest of S.N. , 2014 COA 116, ¶12 . ¶14 Accordingly, following the adjudication, the court must conduct a hearing and hear evidence to determine the proper disposition that will serve the best interests of the child and the public. §§ 19-3-507(1)(a), 19-3-508(1), C.R.S. 2015; People in Interest of C.L.S. , 934 P.2d 851, 855 (Colo. App. 1996).

2016People in Interest of S.N. v. S.N. , 2014 CO 64, ¶10 ; People in Interest of S.N. , 2014 COA 116, ¶12 . ¶14 Accordingly, following the adjudication, the court must conduct a hearing and hear evidence to determine the proper disposition that will serve the best interests of the child and the public. §§ 19-3-507(1)(a), 19-3-508(1), C.R.S. 2015; People in Interest of C.L.S. , 934 P.2d 851, 855 (Colo. App. 1996).

22
People v. Arguellogreen
colo · 1989 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020See Arguello, 772 P.2d at 94 . ¶ 18 Second, under the circumstances, the court wasn’t required to conduct further inquiry into Session’s second and third requests. 8 Generally, upon receiving a motion to substitute counsel, a court must conduct a hearing or inquire into the reasons for the defendant’s request.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
People ex rel. S.N. green
coloctapp · 2014
2 sentences

2016People in Interest of S.N. v. S.N. , 2014 CO 64, ¶10 ; People in Interest of S.N. , 2014 COA 116, ¶12 . ¶14 Accordingly, following the adjudication, the court must conduct a hearing and hear evidence to determine the proper disposition that will serve the best interests of the child and the public. §§ 19-3-507(1)(a), 19-3-508(1), C.R.S. 2015; People in Interest of C.L.S. , 934 P.2d 851, 855 (Colo. App. 1996).

2016People in Interest of S.N. v. S.N. , 2014 CO 64, ¶10 ; People in Interest of S.N. , 2014 COA 116, ¶12 . ¶14 Accordingly, following the adjudication, the court must conduct a hearing and hear evidence to determine the proper disposition that will serve the best interests of the child and the public. §§ 19-3-507(1)(a), 19-3-508(1), C.R.S. 2015; People in Interest of C.L.S. , 934 P.2d 851, 855 (Colo. App. 1996).

22016–2016
People ex rel. S.N. v. S.N. green
colo · 2014
2 sentences

2016People in Interest of S.N. v. S.N. , 2014 CO 64, ¶10 ; People in Interest of S.N. , 2014 COA 116, ¶12 . ¶14 Accordingly, following the adjudication, the court must conduct a hearing and hear evidence to determine the proper disposition that will serve the best interests of the child and the public. §§ 19-3-507(1)(a), 19-3-508(1), C.R.S. 2015; People in Interest of C.L.S. , 934 P.2d 851, 855 (Colo. App. 1996).

2016People in Interest of S.N. v. S.N. , 2014 CO 64, ¶10 ; People in Interest of S.N. , 2014 COA 116, ¶12 . ¶14 Accordingly, following the adjudication, the court must conduct a hearing and hear evidence to determine the proper disposition that will serve the best interests of the child and the public. §§ 19-3-507(1)(a), 19-3-508(1), C.R.S. 2015; People in Interest of C.L.S. , 934 P.2d 851, 855 (Colo. App. 1996).

22016–2016
In re Marriage of Aldrich green
colo · 1997
1 sentence

2002Mother relies upon In re Marriage of Aldrich, 945 P.2d 1370 (Colo.1997).

12002–2002
Dunton v. People green
colo · 1995
1 sentence

2002Dunton v. People, 898 P.2d 571 (Colo.1995).

12002–2002
People v. Pierson green
colo · 1983
1 sentence

1983People v. Pierson, 670 P.2d 770 (Colo.1983).

11983–1983

Where else courts name it

NY 69 (1979–2026) OH 66 (1982–2026) PA 55 (1986–2026) IL 28 (1971–2026) CA 26 (1992–2025) FL 19 (1992–2024) TX 17 (1978–2015) MD 16 (1987–2025) IN 9 (2001–2020) WA 9 (1997–2025) CO 8 (1983–2025) NJ 8 (1975–2021) CT 7 (1993–2026) AZ 6 (1985–2022) MI 4 (1881–2019) GA 3 (1992–2022) ME 2 (2003–2012) SC 2 (2006–2017) MO 2 (1994–2010) DC 2 (1980–1987) MT 2 (2012–2019) TN 2 (2014–2018) ID 2 (2014–2014) VA 2 (2005–2007) LA 2 (2016–2018) KY 2 (2011–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check