conditional liberty privilege in Connecticut

8 Connecticut opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

Case	Followed	Cited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Barnes neutral connappct · 2009 2 sentences 2018The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes , 116 Conn. App. 76 , 79, 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). 2018The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes , 116 Conn. App. 76 , 79, 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009).	2	2011–2018
Connecticut v. Campbell green conn · 2009 2 sentences 2018The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes , 116 Conn. App. 76 , 79, 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). 2011The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes, 116 Conn. App. 76, 79 , 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). *467 The United States Supreme Court has outlined the requirements of due process in these types of hearings: 6 “(a) written notice of the claimed violations of [probation]; (b) disclosure to the [defendant] of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and docume	2	2011–2018
Smith v. Commissioner of Correction green conn · 2009 2 sentences 2018The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes , 116 Conn. App. 76 , 79, 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). 2011The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes, 116 Conn. App. 76, 79 , 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). *467 The United States Supreme Court has outlined the requirements of due process in these types of hearings: 6 “(a) written notice of the claimed violations of [probation]; (b) disclosure to the [defendant] of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and docume	2	2011–2018
State v. Gauthier green connappct · 2002 2 sentences 2009The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for 2009The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for	2	2005–2009
State v. Gauthier green conn · 2003 2 sentences 2009The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for 2009The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for	2	2005–2009
State v. Tucker green connappct · 2018 2 sentences 2020The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz, supra, 181 Conn. App. 232–33. ‘‘[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] viola- tion, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neu 2020The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz, supra, 181 Conn. App. 232–33. ‘‘[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] viola- tion, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neu	1	2020–2020
Hazel v. Comm'r of Corr. green conn · 2018 1 sentence 2020The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz, supra, 181 Conn. App. 232–33. ‘‘[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] viola- tion, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neu	1	2020–2020
State v. Blaine green conn · 2018 1 sentence 2020The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz, supra, 181 Conn. App. 232–33. ‘‘[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] viola- tion, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neu	1	2020–2020
Osborn v. City of Waterbury green conn · 2018 2 sentences 2019The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz , 181 Conn. App. 228 , 232-33, 186 A.3d 66 , cert. denied, 329 Conn. 901 , 184 A.3d 1214 (2018). "[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confron 2019The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz , 181 Conn. App. 228 , 232-33, 186 A.3d 66 , cert. denied, 329 Conn. 901 , 184 A.3d 1214 (2018). "[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confron	1	2019–2019
State v. Andaz green connappct · 2018 2 sentences 2019The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz , 181 Conn. App. 228 , 232-33, 186 A.3d 66 , cert. denied, 329 Conn. 901 , 184 A.3d 1214 (2018). "[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confron 2019The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz , 181 Conn. App. 228 , 232-33, 186 A.3d 66 , cert. denied, 329 Conn. 901 , 184 A.3d 1214 (2018). "[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confron	1	2019–2019
Morrissey v. Brewer green scotus · 1972 2 sentences 2011The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes, 116 Conn. App. 76, 79 , 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). 467 The United States Supreme Court has outlined the requirements of due process in these types of hearings: 6 “(a) written notice of the claimed violations of [probation]; (b) disclosure to the [defendant] of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and docume 2011The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes, 116 Conn. App. 76, 79 , 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). 467 The United States Supreme Court has outlined the requirements of due process in these types of hearings: 6 “(a) written notice of the claimed violations of [probation]; (b) disclosure to the [defendant] of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and docume	1	2011–2011
State v. Shuck neutral connappct · 2009 2 sentences 2010The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for 2010The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for	1	2010–2010
Salmeri v. Department of Public Safety green conn · 2002 1 sentence 2002The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” State v. Faraday, 69 Conn. App. 421, 424 , 794 A.2d 1098 , cert. granted on other grounds, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1055 (2002). “[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine	1	2002–2002
State v. Van Eck green conn · 2002 1 sentence 2002The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” State v. Faraday, 69 Conn. App. 421, 424 , 794 A.2d 1098 , cert. granted on other grounds, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1055 (2002). “[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine	1	2002–2002
State v. Baxter green connappct · 1989 1 sentence 2002The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” State v. Faraday, 69 Conn. App. 421, 424 , 794 A.2d 1098 , cert. granted on other grounds, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1055 (2002). “[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine	1	2002–2002
State v. Faraday green connappct · 2002 2 sentences 2002The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” State v. Faraday, 69 Conn. App. 421, 424 , 794 A.2d 1098 , cert. granted on other grounds, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1055 (2002). “[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine 2002The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” State v. Faraday, 69 Conn. App. 421, 424 , 794 A.2d 1098 , cert. granted on other grounds, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1055 (2002). “[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine	1	2002–2002

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-32 (8)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check