Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Connecticut opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gauthier
green
2 sentences2020The revocation proceeding must com- port with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements of revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for 2020The revocation proceeding must com- port with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements of revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for | 3 | 2005–2020 |
State v. Gauthier
green
2 sentences2020The revocation proceeding must com- port with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements of revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for 2020The revocation proceeding must com- port with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements of revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for | 3 | 2005–2020 |
State v. Barnes
neutral
2 sentences2018The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes , 116 Conn. App. 76 , 79, 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). 2018The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes , 116 Conn. App. 76 , 79, 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). | 2 | 2011–2018 |
State v. Barnes
neutral
2 sentences2018The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes , 116 Conn. App. 76 , 79, 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). 2018The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes , 116 Conn. App. 76 , 79, 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). | 2 | 2011–2018 |
State v. Reilly
green
2 sentences2026Probation itself is a conditional liberty and a privilege that, once granted, is a constitutionally protected interest. . . . [Accordingly] [t]he revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” (Citations omitted; footnote added; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Reilly, 60 Conn. App. 716 , 725-26, 760 A.2d 1001 (2000). 2026Probation itself is a conditional liberty and a privilege that, once granted, is a constitutionally protected interest. . . . [Accordingly] [t]he revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” (Citations omitted; footnote added; footnote omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Reilly, 60 Conn. App. 716 , 725-26, 760 A.2d 1001 (2000). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Tucker
green
2 sentences2020The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz, supra, 181 Conn. App. 232-33. ‘‘[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutr 2020The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz, supra, 181 Conn. App. 232-33. ‘‘[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutr | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Blaine
green
1 sentence2020The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz, supra, 181 Conn. App. 232-33. ‘‘[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutr | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Hazel v. Comm'r of Corr.
green
1 sentence2020The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz, supra, 181 Conn. App. 232-33. ‘‘[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutr | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Andaz
green
2 sentences2019The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz , 181 Conn. App. 228 , 232-33, 186 A.3d 66 , cert. denied, 329 Conn. 901 , 184 A.3d 1214 (2018). "[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confron 2019The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz , 181 Conn. App. 228 , 232-33, 186 A.3d 66 , cert. denied, 329 Conn. 901 , 184 A.3d 1214 (2018). "[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confron | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Andaz
green
2 sentences2019The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz , 181 Conn. App. 228 , 232-33, 186 A.3d 66 , cert. denied, 329 Conn. 901 , 184 A.3d 1214 (2018). "[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confron 2019The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andaz , 181 Conn. App. 228 , 232-33, 186 A.3d 66 , cert. denied, 329 Conn. 901 , 184 A.3d 1214 (2018). "[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confron | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Morrissey v. Brewer
green
2 sentences2011The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes, 116 Conn. App. 76, 79 , 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). *467 The United States Supreme Court has outlined the requirements of due process in these types of hearings: 6 “(a) written notice of the claimed violations of [probation]; (b) disclosure to the [defendant] of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and docume 2011The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Barnes, 116 Conn. App. 76, 79 , 974 A.2d 815 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 925 , 980 A.2d 913 (2009). *467 The United States Supreme Court has outlined the requirements of due process in these types of hearings: 6 “(a) written notice of the claimed violations of [probation]; (b) disclosure to the [defendant] of evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and docume | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Shuck
neutral
2 sentences2010The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for 2010The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty. . . . [T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses in most instances, a neutral hearing body, and a written statement as to the evidence for and reasons for | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Faraday
neutral
2 sentences2002The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” State v. Faraday, 69 Conn. App. 421, 424 , 794 A.2d 1098 , cert. granted on other grounds, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1055 (2002). “[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine 2002The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” State v. Faraday, 69 Conn. App. 421, 424 , 794 A.2d 1098 , cert. granted on other grounds, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1055 (2002). “[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Baxter
green
1 sentence2002The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” State v. Faraday, 69 Conn. App. 421, 424 , 794 A.2d 1098 , cert. granted on other grounds, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1055 (2002). “[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Faraday
green
2 sentences2002The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” State v. Faraday, 69 Conn. App. 421, 424 , 794 A.2d 1098 , cert. granted on other grounds, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1055 (2002). “[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine 2002The revocation proceeding must comport with the basic requirements of due process because termination of that privilege results in a loss of liberty.” State v. Faraday, 69 Conn. App. 421, 424 , 794 A.2d 1098 , cert. granted on other grounds, 261 Conn. 915 , 806 A.2d 1055 (2002). “[T]he minimum due process requirements for revocation of [probation] include written notice of the claimed [probation] violation, disclosure to the [probationer] of the evidence against him, the opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence, the right to confront and cross-examine | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.