Murray challenge in Florida

8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Dubielgreen fladistctapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 1 sentence 2025Because the Murray defendants “were not under lawful arrest and did not seek medical treatment, and the troopers did not have probable cause to believe that they were impaired . . . the implied consent law was clearly not implicated.” Id. at 595 n.1; see also Montes-Valeton v. State, 216 So. 2 In the past decade, we have dispensed with limiting “voluntary consent” to situations where the consenting party had “full knowledge that the implied consent laws required submission only to a breath or urine test and that the blood test was being offered as an alternative.” State v. Dubiel, 958 So. 2d 4	1	1
Johnson v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2009 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 1 sentence 2018See Grosvenor v. State, 874 So. 2d 1176 , 1181–82 (Fla. 2004); Johnson v. State, 2 So. 3d 1108, 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).	1	1
Grosvenor v. Stategreen fla · 2004 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 1 sentence 2018See Grosvenor v. State, 874 So. 2d 1176 , 1181–82 (Fla. 2004); Johnson v. State, 2 So. 3d 1108, 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009).	1	1
Staley v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 1 sentence 2004"It is well-settled that sentences imposed under a sentencing enhancement statute may not run consecutively if the offenses occurred during a single criminal episode." Staley v. State, 829 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319, 322 (Fla.1996) ("We have held that enhancement sentences arising out of a single criminal episode may not be imposed consecutively."); Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995); Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993); Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993); Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992); Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1	1	1
Boler v. Stategreen fla · 1996 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 1 sentence 2004"It is well-settled that sentences imposed under a sentencing enhancement statute may not run consecutively if the offenses occurred during a single criminal episode." Staley v. State, 829 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319, 322 (Fla.1996) ("We have held that enhancement sentences arising out of a single criminal episode may not be imposed consecutively."); Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995); Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993); Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993); Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992); Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1	1	1
Murray v. Kearneygreen fladistctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002See Murray v. Kearney, 770 So.2d 273 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). 2002See id. at 275 n. 4.	1	1
Washington v. Stategreen fla · 1994 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997 1 sentence 1997See Washington v. State, 653 So.2d 362 (Fla.1994), and cases cited therein, stating that although a warrantless search is per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment, it will be considered lawful if conducted pursuant to consent which was given voluntarily and freely. [4] Test results concerning the other four hairs were inconclusive. [5] Nippes told the court that the report of the National Research Council (NRC), DNA Technology in Forensic Science (1992) [hereinafter NRC Report], "was an endorsement of the forensic DNA application to forensic science whether it was RFLP or PCR." In fact,	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Murray green fladistctapp · 2011 1 sentence 2025Because the Murray defendants “were not under lawful arrest and did not seek medical treatment, and the troopers did not have probable cause to believe that they were impaired . . . the implied consent law was clearly not implicated.” Id. at 595 n.1; see also Montes-Valeton v. State, 216 So. 2 In the past decade, we have dispensed with limiting “voluntary consent” to situations where the consenting party had “full knowledge that the implied consent laws required submission only to a breath or urine test and that the blood test was being offered as an alternative.” State v. Dubiel, 958 So. 2d 4	1	2025–2025
Murray v. State green fla · 2009 2 sentences 2018Id. at 1125 . 2018Murray , 3 So.3d at 1114 .	1	2018–2018
Brooks v. State green fla · 1993 1 sentence 2004"It is well-settled that sentences imposed under a sentencing enhancement statute may not run consecutively if the offenses occurred during a single criminal episode." Staley v. State, 829 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319, 322 (Fla.1996) ("We have held that enhancement sentences arising out of a single criminal episode may not be imposed consecutively."); Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995); Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993); Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993); Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992); Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1	1	2004–2004
Hale v. State green fla · 1993 1 sentence 2004"It is well-settled that sentences imposed under a sentencing enhancement statute may not run consecutively if the offenses occurred during a single criminal episode." Staley v. State, 829 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319, 322 (Fla.1996) ("We have held that enhancement sentences arising out of a single criminal episode may not be imposed consecutively."); Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995); Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993); Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993); Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992); Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1	1	2004–2004
Daniels v. State green fla · 1992 1 sentence 2004"It is well-settled that sentences imposed under a sentencing enhancement statute may not run consecutively if the offenses occurred during a single criminal episode." Staley v. State, 829 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319, 322 (Fla.1996) ("We have held that enhancement sentences arising out of a single criminal episode may not be imposed consecutively."); Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995); Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993); Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993); Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992); Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1	1	2004–2004
Jackson v. State green fla · 1995 1 sentence 2004"It is well-settled that sentences imposed under a sentencing enhancement statute may not run consecutively if the offenses occurred during a single criminal episode." Staley v. State, 829 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319, 322 (Fla.1996) ("We have held that enhancement sentences arising out of a single criminal episode may not be imposed consecutively."); Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995); Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993); Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993); Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992); Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1	1	2004–2004
Palmer v. State green fla · 1983 1 sentence 2004"It is well-settled that sentences imposed under a sentencing enhancement statute may not run consecutively if the offenses occurred during a single criminal episode." Staley v. State, 829 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); see also Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319, 322 (Fla.1996) ("We have held that enhancement sentences arising out of a single criminal episode may not be imposed consecutively."); Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995); Brooks v. State, 630 So.2d 527 (Fla.1993); Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993); Daniels v. State, 595 So.2d 952 (Fla.1992); Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1	1	2004–2004
State v. Franklin green fladistctapp · 2003 1 sentence 2003As to Taylor , we certify that this decision conflicts with the Third District’s decision in State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review granted, No. SC03-413 (Fla. Sept. 19, 2003).	1	2003–2003
Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart green scotus · 1976 1 sentence 1994Defendant Murray's motion and the matter submitted in support thereof at the hearing before the circuit court are legally insufficient to support entry of the circuit court's order restricting the broadcast of the described television program, Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539 (1976), and such order is hereby quashed.	1	1994–1994

Where else courts name it

PA 17 (1997–2023) MS 12 (1987–2007) OH 9 (1989–2025) FL 8 (1994–2025) TX 7 (1980–2024) CA 6 (1979–2025) UT 6 (2004–2023) MA 5 (1989–2019) NY 4 (1992–2021) GA 4 (2000–2018) IN 4 (2002–2019) LA 4 (1987–2017) IL 4 (2008–2023) WI 4 (2002–2024) DE 3 (1995–2026) MO 3 (1991–2005) TN 3 (1998–2016) MD 3 (2005–2012) MT 2 (1993–2007) AR 2 (2003–2012) VA 2 (1985–2026) HI 2 (2017–2017) CO 2 (2002–2019) AL 2 (1999–2005) KS 2 (2015–2015) VT 2 (2006–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check