8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Beverlygreen2 sentences1998This doctrine originates from the common *196 law and, as stated by our supreme court in In re Beverly, 342 So.2d 481, 484 (Fla.1977), "[t]he Parens Patriae doctrine is used as a basis for state laws which protect the interest of minors, establish guardianships and provide for the involuntary commitment of the mentally ill." Here, it was used by the court to protect children determined to be dependent. 1998This doctrine originates from the common *196 law and, as stated by our supreme court in In re Beverly, 342 So.2d 481, 484 (Fla.1977), "[t]he Parens Patriae doctrine is used as a basis for state laws which protect the interest of minors, establish guardianships and provide for the involuntary commitment of the mentally ill." Here, it was used by the court to protect children determined to be dependent. | 2 | 2 |
Nelson v. Nelsongreen2 sentences1996Nelson v. Nelson, 433 So.2d 1015, 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Rothman v. Rothman, 599 So.2d 260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Kennedy v. Kennedy, 559 So.2d 713 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Alvarez v. Alvarez, 566 So.2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). 1983Id. at 1019 . | 1 | 2 |
Global Travel Marketing, Inc. v. Sheagreen1 sentence2015See, e.g., Global Travel Mktg. v. Shea, 908 So. 2d 392, 399 (Fla. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
Satz v. Perlmuttergreen1 sentence1989Perlmutter, 362 So.2d at 162. | 1 | 1 |
Lynch v. Baxleygreen1 sentence1989This doctrine, which literally translates to mean "parent of the country," originates from the presumption that "the state is the ultimate guardian of those of its citizens who are incapable of caring for their own interests," In re Beverly, 342 So.2d 481, 485 (Fla. 1977) (quoting Lynch v. Baxley, 386 F. Supp. 378, 390-91 (M.D.Ala. 1974)), and has been used traditionally "as a basis for state laws which protect the interests of minors, establish guardianships and provide for the involuntary commitment of the mentally ill." In re Beverly, 342 So.2d at 485 . | 1 | 1 |
Fry v. Ballgreen2 sentences1983See, e.g., Fry v. Ball, 190 Colo. 128 , 544 P.2d 402 (1975); In re Custody of Thomas, 36 Colo. App. 96 , 537 P.2d 1095 (1975); Zillmer v. Zillmer, 8 Wis.2d 657 , 101 N.W.2d 703 (1960). 1983See, e.g., Fry v. Ball, 190 Colo. 128 , 544 P.2d 402 (1975); In re Custody of Thomas, 36 Colo. App. 96 , 537 P.2d 1095 (1975); Zillmer v. Zillmer, 8 Wis.2d 657 , 101 N.W.2d 703 (1960). | 1 | 1 |
Sluis v. Betty W.green2 sentences1977See In re W., 29 Cal. App.3d 623 , 105 Cal. Rptr. 736 (1972). 1977See In re W., 29 Cal. App.3d 623 , 105 Cal. Rptr. 736 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alvarez v. Alvarez
green
1 sentence1996Nelson v. Nelson, 433 So.2d 1015, 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Rothman v. Rothman, 599 So.2d 260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Kennedy v. Kennedy, 559 So.2d 713 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Alvarez v. Alvarez, 566 So.2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Rothman v. Rothman
green
1 sentence1996Nelson v. Nelson, 433 So.2d 1015, 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Rothman v. Rothman, 599 So.2d 260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Kennedy v. Kennedy, 559 So.2d 713 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Alvarez v. Alvarez, 566 So.2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Kennedy v. Kennedy
green
1 sentence1996Nelson v. Nelson, 433 So.2d 1015, 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Rothman v. Rothman, 599 So.2d 260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Kennedy v. Kennedy, 559 So.2d 713 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Alvarez v. Alvarez, 566 So.2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
In Re Custody of Thomas
green
2 sentences1983See, e.g., Fry v. Ball, 190 Colo. 128 , 544 P.2d 402 (1975); In re Custody of Thomas, 36 Colo. App. 96 , 537 P.2d 1095 (1975); Zillmer v. Zillmer, 8 Wis.2d 657 , 101 N.W.2d 703 (1960). 1983See, e.g., Fry v. Ball, 190 Colo. 128 , 544 P.2d 402 (1975); In re Custody of Thomas, 36 Colo. App. 96 , 537 P.2d 1095 (1975); Zillmer v. Zillmer, 8 Wis.2d 657 , 101 N.W.2d 703 (1960). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Zillmer v. Zillmer
green
1 sentence1983See, e.g., Fry v. Ball, 190 Colo. 128 , 544 P.2d 402 (1975); In re Custody of Thomas, 36 Colo. App. 96 , 537 P.2d 1095 (1975); Zillmer v. Zillmer, 8 Wis.2d 657 , 101 N.W.2d 703 (1960). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.