8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jakupovic v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See Jakupovic , 287 Ga. at 207 (1) (d), 695 S.E.2d 247 . 2018See Jakupovic , 287 Ga. at 207 (1) (d), 695 S.E.2d 247 . | 1 | 1 |
Wilder v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See, generally, Wilder v. State, 220 Ga. App. 694, 695 (2) ( 469 SE2d 549 ) (1996) (remanding the case to the trial court for consideration of defendant’s claim that trial counsel was ineffective where the “first opportunity to raise the issue . . . came after his trial attorney filed a notice of appeal on defendant’s behalf”); compare Dawson v. State, 302 Ga. App. 842, 843-844 ( 691 SE2d 886 ) (remand denied where “appellate counsel was appointed after the grant of [an] out-of- time appeal but prior to the filing of the notice of appeal”). 2018See, generally, Wilder v. State, 220 Ga. App. 694, 695 (2) ( 469 SE2d 549 ) (1996) (remanding the case to the trial court for consideration of defendant’s claim that trial counsel was ineffective where the “first opportunity to raise the issue . . . came after his trial attorney filed a notice of appeal on defendant’s behalf”); compare Dawson v. State, 302 Ga. App. 842, 843-844 ( 691 SE2d 886 ) (remand denied where “appellate counsel was appointed after the grant of [an] out-of- time appeal but prior to the filing of the notice of appeal”). | 1 | 1 |
Dawson v. Stategreen2 sentences2018See, generally, Wilder v. State, 220 Ga. App. 694, 695 (2) ( 469 SE2d 549 ) (1996) (remanding the case to the trial court for consideration of defendant’s claim that trial counsel was ineffective where the “first opportunity to raise the issue . . . came after his trial attorney filed a notice of appeal on defendant’s behalf”); compare Dawson v. State, 302 Ga. App. 842, 843-844 ( 691 SE2d 886 ) (remand denied where “appellate counsel was appointed after the grant of [an] out-of- time appeal but prior to the filing of the notice of appeal”). 2018See, generally, Wilder v. State, 220 Ga. App. 694, 695 (2) ( 469 SE2d 549 ) (1996) (remanding the case to the trial court for consideration of defendant’s claim that trial counsel was ineffective where the “first opportunity to raise the issue . . . came after his trial attorney filed a notice of appeal on defendant’s behalf”); compare Dawson v. State, 302 Ga. App. 842, 843-844 ( 691 SE2d 886 ) (remand denied where “appellate counsel was appointed after the grant of [an] out-of- time appeal but prior to the filing of the notice of appeal”). | 1 | 1 |
Allen v. Stategreen2 sentences2016When Gray amended her motion for new trial, however, she modified this claim, arguing only that “[t]he evidence was insufficient to support [her] conviction.” And at the hearing on Gray’s motion for new trial, she clarified that she was solely arguing the points raised in her amended motion, she repeatedly stated that her claim was that the evidence was insufficient to support her convictions, and she never argued that the verdict was strongly against the weight of the evidence or contrary to evidence and the principles of justice and equity. 2 Cf. Allen v. State, 296 Ga. 738, 741 (2) ( 770 SE 2016When Gray amended her motion for new trial, however, she modified this claim, arguing only that “[t]he evidence was insufficient to support [her] conviction.” And at the hearing on Gray’s motion for new trial, she clarified that she was solely arguing the points raised in her amended motion, she repeatedly stated that her claim was that the evidence was insufficient to support her convictions, and she never argued that the verdict was strongly against the weight of the evidence or contrary to evidence and the principles of justice and equity. 2 Cf. Allen v. State, 296 Ga. 738, 741 (2) ( 770 SE | 1 | 1 |
Medlock v. Stategreen2 sentences2009This was error, and we vacate the denial of Gray’s motion for new trial on this ground and “remand this case to the trial court for a determination of whether the district attorney can support his questions to the defendant’s character witnesses as required.” Medlock v. State, 263 Ga. 246, 248 (2) ( 430 SE2d 754 ) (1993). 2009This was error, and we vacate the denial of Gray’s motion for new trial on this ground and “remand this case to the trial court for a determination of whether the district attorney can support his questions to the defendant’s character witnesses as required.” Medlock v. State, 263 Ga. 246, 248 (2) ( 430 SE2d 754 ) (1993). | 1 | 1 |
Christenson v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See also Christenson v. State, 261 Ga. at 91 (8) (c). | 1 | 1 |
Lewis v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Lewis v. State, 266 Ga. App. 812, 813 ( 598 SE2d 90 ) (2004); McMillian, 266 Ga. App. at 750 . 2005Lewis v. State, 266 Ga. App. 812, 813 ( 598 SE2d 90 ) (2004); McMillian, 266 Ga. App. at 750 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
NAYYAR Et Al. v. BHATIA.
neutral
1 sentence2019However, the order dismissing Gray, “in which the trial court made factual findings based on disputed facts, does not finally determine issues of fact and law, [with respect to Gray’s status at the time of the accident] nor does it decide any rights between [the City and the County].” Nayyar v. Bhatia, 348 Ga. App. 789 , 793 (2) ( 824 SE2d 675 ) (2019) (citations omitted). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Fulton v. State
green
2 sentences2018On May 9, 2016, this Court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, stating that, “an untimely motion for new trial does not toll the time for filing the notice of appeal.” Case No. S16A1270 (citing Fulton v. State, 277 Ga. 126 ( 587 SE2d 20 ) (2003)). 2018On May 9, 2016, this Court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, stating that, “an untimely motion for new trial does not toll the time for filing the notice of appeal.” Case No. S16A1270 (citing Fulton v. State, 277 Ga. 126 ( 587 SE2d 20 ) (2003)). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
ELLIS v. the STATE.
green
2 sentences2018Turning to Gray's claim that he is now unable to locate a character witness, we have explained that in order to carry the burden of showing "prejudice due to the unavailability of a witness, [the defendant] must show that the missing witness could supply material evidence for the defense." Ellis v. State , 343 Ga. App. 391 , 400 (4) (d), 806 S.E.2d 839 (2017). 2018Turning to Gray's claim that he is now unable to locate a character witness, we have explained that in order to carry the burden of showing "prejudice due to the unavailability of a witness, [the defendant] must show that the missing witness could supply material evidence for the defense." Ellis v. State , 343 Ga. App. 391 , 400 (4) (d), 806 S.E.2d 839 (2017). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
McMillian v. State
green
1 sentence2005Lewis v. State, 266 Ga. App. 812, 813 ( 598 SE2d 90 ) (2004); McMillian, 266 Ga. App. at 750 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Jackson v. Virginia
red
1 sentence1994Since a rational trier of fact could have found Gray guilty of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt in accordance with the standard enunciated in Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979), the trial court’s denial of Gray’s motion for directed verdict of acquittal must be affirmed. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences1994Williams v. State, 210 Ga. App. 357 (1) ( 436 SE2d 228 ) (1993). 2. 1994Williams v. State, 210 Ga. App. 357 (1) ( 436 SE2d 228 ) (1993). 2. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.